Background Information

Pepper History

Capsicums

Different Types of Capsicums

Oleoresin Extraction

Capsaicinoids

Inflammation of Mucous Membranes

Testing the Hotness of Pepper Sprays

Scoville Heat Test

High Pressure Liquid Chromatography


OC Concentration and Scoville Heat Units

Testing the Hotness of Pepper Sprays

CAP-STUN HPLC Capsaicin Test

IACP OC Report

 

Oleoresin Capsicum

In the early 1980’s Zarc International, Inc. introduced a proprietary “capsicum pepper technology” to be used as a safe and effective non-lethal weapon by military and law enforcement. “Capsicums” are chili peppers which occur in many varieties that range from mild to hot. Capsicum encompasses twenty species and some 300 different varieties of pepper plants. “Oleoresin” is the industrial extraction of the dried ripe fruits of capsicums and contains a complex mixture of highly potent organic compounds. This section is devoted to general information regarding Oleoresin Capsicum.


OC – A breakthrough After 70 years of Tear Gas and Chemical Agents

For years law enforcement agencies have used DM, CN and CS chemical agents which have proven to be unreliable and counterproductive. Tearing and irritation were not sufficient to stop driven and highly agitated individuals. Dissatisfaction with the available tools and tear gas agents led law enforcement to search for an alternative agent.

A search of early records reveals that pepper has been used at various times during the past 2500 years as a weapon. The Chinese used what were called "stink pots". They consisted of pepper burned in an oil, causing irritating and suffocating smoke. The Japanese used finely ground pepper which was put in thin rice paper pouches and thrown at the faces of their adversaries to temporarily blind them. The Indian schools of martial arts, (which gave birth to many Far Eastern schools of hand-to-hand combat through Indian Buddhist missionaries) such as Kalaripayat, Vajramushti, Marman and Kara-hatse (the forefather of Karate), are among those who have applied forms of pepper as a combative tool.

It was black pepper, primarily, that inspired most of man’s great explorations of the Middle Ages, including the discovery of America. Black pepper started America’s trade with the Orient and played an important role in the early days of the United States. On June 23, 1672, the first colonial American took an active part in spice trading: Boston-born Elihu Yale, later to give his name and wealth to the renowned University, arrived in Madras, India, as a clerk of the British East India Company. There he established contacts upon which he built a fortune in spices. In 1780, Jonathan Carnes broke Europe’s spice monopoly by dealing directly with the East Indies and bringing a shipload of pepper back to Salem, Massachusetts. From 1799 to 1846, pepper, worth many millions of dollars, was brought to Salem by daring Yankee skippers who founded America’s merchant marine.

Black pepper comes from the dried berry (called a peppercorn) of a woody, climbing vine. Its scientific name is Piper nigrum L. There is no relation to the pod peppers which give us sweet red and green peppers and the hot capsicum peppers (chili).

When Columbus dropped anchor in the New World in search of spices, he discovered chili peppers and made at least two mistakes we still live with. Thinking he was in "India", he called native Americans "Indians". He also named chilies "peppers", thinking they were related to black pepper, Piper Nigrum, which they are not. The family of chili peppers is called "Capsicum".

In the pre-Columbian tribes of Panama, the Shaman (spiritual medium) used Capsicum in combination with cacao and tobacco to enter into hallucinatory trances, in order to travel to the heavens or to the underworld. Today, the Cuna Indians of Panama burn capsicum so the irritating smoke will chase away evil spirits during a girl’s puberty ceremony. They also trail a string of capsicum behind their canoes to discourage sharks from attacking, thus providing the earliest insight into the possible use of capsicum as a shark repellent.

In southern Mexico and the Yucatan Peninsula, capsicums have been part of the human diet since about 7500 B.C. and thus their use predates the two great central American civilizations, the Mayas and the Aztecs. From their original use as a spice collected in the wild, capsicums gained importance after their domestication, and were a significant food when the Olmec culture was developing around 1000 B.C. By the time the Mayas reached the peak of their civilization in southern Mexico and the Yucatan Peninsula, around A.D. 500, they had a highly developed system of agriculture. Perhaps as many as thirty different varieties of Capsicum were cultivated.

The American wild chili peppers probably originated in present-day Bolivia by means of birds dispersing the seeds, and eventually spread throughout Central and South America. Chilies were a dominant part of early American diets. The archaeological record at Tehuacan, Mexico southeast of Mexico City, shows that wild peppers were eaten in Meso-America at least as far back as 7000 B.C., and were probably domesticated by 2500 B.C. To the Incas, chili peppers were one of the four brothers of the creation myth, Agar-Uchu or "Brother Chili Pepper".

Chilies were discovered when the Spanish explorers came to the Caribbean. In the islands off the New World they found little red-colored vegetable pods which the natives used in cooking and which imparted a sharp bite to food. Peter Martyr, who came to America with Columbus in 1493, wrote, "There are innumerable kinds of Agi (the Indian name for pod peppers), the variety whereof is known by their leaves and flowers." Some were red, some yellow, some violet, some brown, some white. They were of all shapes and sizes. The only aromatic plants Columbus found in the Western World however, were capsicums: "plenty of Aji, (capsicum pepper), which is more valuable than black pepper, and allspice or pimenta, a tree whose leaf had the finest smell of cloves that I ever met with", thus wrote Dr. Diego Chanca of Columbus expedition.

The podded Capsicum family proved to be extremely adaptable when the explorers sent seeds back to Europe. In an amazingly short time, the cultivation of Capsicum pods spread to almost every part of the world. Moreover, in many places the pods developed different characteristics with regard to shape, color, size and pungency.

The arrival of capsicum from the New World coincided with the invasion of the Ottoman Turks and resulted in their spread throughout Central Europe. The armies of Suleyman the Magnificent conquered Syria and Egypt in 1516-17, Yugoslavia in 1521, and Hungary in 1526. The year 1526 is the date usually given for the introduction of the capsicum known as paprika into Hungary by the Turks. During this invasion a new crop was introduced to the land of the Magyars. The Turks called it "Turkish Pepper", the Hungarians called it paparka, a variation on the Bulgarian piperka, which in turn was derived from the Latin piper, for pepper. The brilliant red powder we know as paprika comes from the dried pods (fruit) of the plant species Capsicum annuum L. As such, it is part of a botanical group that ranges from the sweet Bell peppers we eat as a vegetable to the very hottest of chilies. The Hungarian scientist, Dr. Szent Gyorgyi, who won a Nobel Prize in 1937 for his work on Vitamin C, found paprika pods to be one of the richest of all sources of absorbic acid (Vitamin C).

Back to Top


Pepper History

The following lists some of the important events in the history of pepper:

80 B.C. Alexandria, Egypt becomes the greatest spice trading port of Eastern Mediterranean, with one of its entrances known as "Pepper Gate".
410 A.D. Alaric the Visigoth demands 3000 pounds of peppers as ransom from Rome and two years later extracts 300 pounds annual pepper tribute from the city.
1494 Columbus' physician, Chanca, describes Mexican Capsicums.
1498 Vasco de Gama reaches Calicut, India, the spice center; pepper prices fall in Europe.
1563 Garcia da Orta writes "Colloquies on Drugs and Simples of India" the first scientific book on oriental spices published in the western world.
1672 Elihu Yale reaches India and starts spice business which eventually provides the fortune with which he founded Yale University.
1797 Captain Jonathan Carnes of Salem, Massachusetts, returns from Sumatra with first large pepper cargo and puts United States in world spice trade.
1805 U.S. reaches peak of its Sumatra pepper trade; re-exports alone totalled 7,000,000 pounds in one year.
1835 English settlers in Texas originate chili powder as a convenient way of making Mexican type dishes.
1873 Piracy and native hostility finally end America's direct pepper trade with Sumatra and the last of the 967 pepper voyages is completed.
1910 California begins chili pepper production.
1937 Professor Szent Gyorgyi wins Nobel Prize for research with paprika, in which he discovers Vitamin C.
1976 World trade in black pepper sets an all time high of 220 million pounds.

Back to Top


Capsicums

Capsicums are any solanaceous (nightshade species) plant of the genus capsicum, as C. frutescens, the common pepper of the garden occurring in many varieties that range from mild to hot, having pungent seeds enclosed in a podded or bell-shaped pericarp. The term "Capsicum" is a genus name encompassing twenty species and some 300 different varieties of plants producing fleshy vegetable pods. Botanically it is part of the family Solanaceae which also gives us tomatoes and tobacco. The three most important species of Capsicums are Capsicum annuum, Capsicum frutescens, and Capsicum fastigiatum. In consumer terms the Capsicum family gives us paprika and chili peppers.

Chili peppers come in many different shapes and sizes, though they all belong to the genus Capsicum. There are small, round and red chiltepins, which grow wild in Mexico and the Southwest and are harvested by millions each year for sale in the U.S. market. Mirasol is a brilliantly red pepper that, instead of hanging from the plant, grows straight up. Habaneros are green when unripe, and ripen to a bold orange or red. 

Anatomy and Chemical Characteristics of Capsicum

Capsicum consists of 38% pericarp, 2% inner sheath, 56% seeds, and 4% stalks. The property that separates the Capsicum family from other plant groups and the quintessence of the chili pepper is an alkaloid called Capsaicin (kap-sa-i-sin), an unusually powerful and pungent crystalline substance found in no other plant. Capsaicin is the source of pungency and heat in Capsicums.

peppere.jpg (29000 bytes)

 

Capsaicin is a colorless, crystalline, bitter compound present in capsicum [Previously referred to as capsicine]. It has a molecular weight of 305.46. Capsaicin has a Melting Point of 65ºC, Boiling Point of 81ºC, Vapor Pressure of 40 and a Vapor Density of 1.59 (Air=1). The range in capsaicin content in the pericarp of an average capsicum is about 0.17% to 0.58% and the inner sheath is 6.6% to 7.7%; color is concentrated mostly in the pericarp. Chili seeds contain 19% oil with 0.024% capsaicin content. The percentage of capsaicin in the capsicum plant depends on the species, geographical origin and the climatic conditions.

Capsaicin is produced by glands at the juncture of the placenta and the pod wall. The capsaicin spreads unevenly throughout the inside of the pod and is concentrated mostly in the placental tissue. The seeds are not sources of heat, as commonly believed. From one Kg. of cayenne pepper for example, approximately 2.13 g. of crude capsaicin can be isolated, which is about 20 times the amount found in paprika.

Back to Top


Different Type of Capsicum

The following is the list of Capsicum among 300 existing varieties:

Aji (Capsicum baccatum):Aji is the general term for Capsicum in South America. Archeological evidence from Peru indicates that Aji was cultivated as early as 2500 B.C. There are three varieties of Aji; 1. Capsicum baccatum var. baccatum 2. var. pendulum, and 3. var. microcarpum.

Ancho-Poblano: The earliest Poblano forms were probably cultivated in pre-Columbian times, and the present varieties are at least a century old, attesting to their popularity in the cooking of Mexico.
Bell: The blocky pods of this type are shaped like bells. The first mention of this capsicum occurred in 1681 when the English pirate Lionel Wafer wrote of them growing in Panama.
Cayenne: This type was named after either the city of Cayenne or the Cayenne River, both in French Guiana.
Cherry: The pods of this type resemble cherries. It is mentioned in botanical literature as early as 1586 and was illustrated in Besler's Celeberrimi Eystetensis, an herbal published in 1613.
de Arbol: The name means "tree-like". Chili-de-Arbol was mentioned by Francisco Hernandez in 1615.
Exotics: The pods are usually variations on Piquin or Cayenne. The Santaka and Hontaka varieties are very similar to types of Piquins with elongate pods.
Habanero: Capsicum chinese. The word in Spanish means from Havana. An intact fruit of a small domesticated Habanero was found in Pre-ceramic levels in Guitarrero Cave in the Peruvian highlands and was dated to 6500 B.C.
Jalapeno: Named because of its association with the Mexican city of Xalapa in Veracruz, where it was grown in ancient times. There are four Mexican types: 1. Tipico, 2. Peludo, 3. Espinalteco, and 4. Morita.
Mirasol: It appears to be a Mexico native and there are several varieties: 1. Cascabel, Guajillo, Loretto 74, and Real Mirasol.
New Mexican: Formerly called Anaheim. The predecessors of the New Mexican varieties.
Ornamental: They are primarily used for ornamental rather than culinary use, however they are edible.
Pasilla: It means little raisin in Spanish.
Piquin: The wild form of this capsicum, variously called chiltepin and chiltecpin. The Piquins were part of the prehistoric migration of Capsicum annuum from southern Brazil or Bolivia and north to Central America and Mexico. Ethnobotanists believe that birds were responsible for the spread of most wild capsicums.
Rocoto: Capsicum pubescens. From the Andean origin, the Rocoto was introduced into the mountainous regions of Chiapas and Michoacan, Mexico, in the early part of the twentieth century.
Serrano: It was grown in the mountains of northern Puebla and Hidalgo, Mexico. The longer Serranos, called Largo, are not as common as the shorter varieties. In addition to Largo variety, there are; 1. Balin, 2. Tipico, 3. Altamira, 4. Panuco, 5. Tampiqueno, and 6. Hidalgo.
Tabasco: The name is derived from the Mexican city of Tabasco, which had extensive trade with New Orleans during the 1850's.
Hungarian Yellow Wax: This capsicum was developed from the Banana pepper, which was introduced into the United States from Hungary in 1932.
Astrahan and Harkov: Ukrainian species

Back to Top


Oleoresin Extraction

The industrial spice Oleoresin extraction industry came into being with the development of Oleoresin process during the 1930’s. The process essentially involves concentration of the oleoresin from capsicum plant by evaporation of solvent and, finally desolventisation to achieve the limits of residual solvent. Oleoresin, being a natural product, is thermally sensitive and the processing must be designed to minimize thermal degradation and preserve the full pungency. Conventional concentration and desolventisation techniques employ batch evaporation. In this process the oleoresin gets cooked over an extended length of time, which directly diminishes the Oleoresin quality.

Oleoresin Capsicum (OC) is therefore the extract of the dried ripe fruits of Capsicums and contains a complex mixture of essential oils, waxes, colored materials, and several capsaicinoids. It also contains resin acids and their esters, terpenes, and oxidation or polymerization products of these terpenes. One kilogram of Oleoresin Capsicum is equivalent to approximately 18 to 20 kilograms of good grade well-ground capsicum. This ratio may vary depending on the type of capsicum being processed.

Back to Top


Capsaicinoids

The potent active ingredient, considered early as a single substance, "Capsaicin" was soon shown to be a mixture of two unsaturated and three saturated homologs. This mixture is now called Capsaicinoids. The pungent components of Capsicum annum include at least 5 compounds, known as Capsaicinoids:

Name Code Systematic Name
Capsaicin C trans-8-methyl-N-vanillyl-6-nonenamide
Dihydrocapsaicin DHC 8-methyl-N-vanillyl-nonamide
Nordihydrocapsaicin NDHC 7-methyl-N-vanillyl-octamide
Homodihydrocapsaicin HDHC 9-methyl-N-vanillyl-decamide
Homocapsaicin HC trans-9-methyl-N-vanillyl-7-decenamide

Capsaicinoids are produced by glands in the pepper’s placenta, which is the top of the partition just below the stem. The placenta is about 16 times more pungent than the flesh.

There are several other ingredients in Capsicum that directly regulate the effectiveness of an OC formulation. One such ingredient is the pigment or the "Carotinoid" also called "Capsanthin" with a molecular formula of C40H56O3, and systematic name of (3R,3’S,5’R)-3,3'-Dihydroxy-ß,k-caroten-6'-one. Capsanthin has a molecular weight of 584.85

Capsaicin is available in synthetic or natural form. Law enforcement agencies should be aware of synthetic analogs that are used in order to increase the heat factor in Capsicum extracts, as well as synthetic or imitation Oleoresin Capsicums. Some of the known related synthetic capsaicin analogs are:

N-Vanillyl octanamide N-Vanillyl decanamide
N-Vanillyl nonanamide N-Vanillyl undecanamide
N-Vanillyl paaiperic acidamide

Be aware of synthetic analogues (chemicals) such as n-vanillyl octanamide used to increase the heat factor in Capsicum extracts to reduce production costs. These compounds are acidic in nature and can cause serious health hazards and eye damage.

Capsaicin produces inflammation of the mucous membranes. This is why those coming into contact with CAP-STUN experience an immediate closing of the eyes, difficulty in breathing and burning sensation of the skin called REMS.

This neurogenic inflamation is the key difference between CAP-STUN’s effects and other chemical agents and tear-gases.

Back to Top


Inflammation of Mucous Membranes

Natural Oleoresin extract of Capsicum contains Capsaicin which causes the irritation of the trigeminal cells. These cells are pain receptors located in the mouth, nose, stomach and the mucous membrane. They release Substance P (SP), a chemical messenger that communicates any pain or skin inflammation to the brain.

SP is a neurotransmitter. Neurotransmitters are inter-cellular chemical messengers that are secreted by neurons (nerve cells) across specialized structures (synapses) to transmit chemical information to one or more target cells.

Capsaicin as an irritant compound present in CAP-STUN induces neurogenic inflammation upon local application. In recent years this agent has been used extensively in research on primary sensory neurons because of its selective action on a population of C-fibre afferent and possibly also on an A-delta fibre type. Capsaicin stimulation of sensory nerves not only produces central transmission of sensory signals but also releases SP from central and peripheral sensory nerve terminals.

Substance P (SP) belongs to the Tachykinin family, which represents a group of biologically active peptides with a similar sequence of amino acids in the C-terminal region. SP was the first peptide of the tachykinin family to be found in mammals.

Substance P Arg-Pro-Lys-Pro-Gln-Gln-Phe-Phe-Gly-Leu-Met-NH2

The natural release of SP is therefore likely to represent a direct action on postcapillary venules or smooth muscle cells. Both capsaicinoids and SP act as Spasmogens on certain viscera containing smooth muscle causing contractions. Substance P is one of the key causes of total incapacity effects causing contraction of the oesophagus, trachea, respiratory track and iris muscles of the eyes.

Back to Top


Testing the Hotness of Pepper Sprays

1. Capsaicin is the actual ingredient within the OC that causes burning sensation and inflammation of mucous membranes. The amount of Capsaicin in layman terms, is the cause of the hotness of chili peppers.

To scientifically measure the amount of Capsaicin within OC sprays, HPLC method is used to obtain exact and accurate data. (See the Official Analytical Methods of the American Spice Trade Association (HPLC method 21.1). This test method provides an acceptable international guidelines for testing the Capsaicin amount by the scientific community.

2. For example, United States Testing laboratory HPLC on CAPSTUN product resulted in 0.92% Capsaicin for Z-305 model. With the HPLC method the users are rest assured that exactly 0.92% of Capsaicin is contained in the canister regardless of the formula or other ingredients.

3. Scoville Heat "SHU" Test method (See the American Spice Trade Association Method 21.0.) dates back to 1930's and is replaced by the modern and machine accurate HPLC method.

SHU testing is none other than "tongue" tasting of the spice by a panel of 5 individuals. SHU therefore depends on the subjective taste experience of the panel. The SHU test is not accurate since it depends on the individual taste sensitivity which changes from person to person and does not measure the actual chemical percentage within the product. SHU test is an appropriate test for the food spice community, however it cannot serve the weapon technology, where an officer depends on the OC's high performance.

Back to Top


Method 21.0 Scoville Heat Test (SHU)

Purpose: To determine pungency in Capsicum spices and oleoresins, via SHU "taste" analysis.

A. Apparatus:

  1. Erlenmeyer flask, narrow neck, 125 ml. with ground glass stopper.
  2. Pipette, serological, 1 ml. capacity, 0.01 ml. graduations.
  3. Pipettes, volumetric transfer 2 ml. and 5 ml. capacity.
  4. Volumetric flasks, stoppered, 50 ml. capacity, 100 ml. capacity.
  5. Funnel, analytical 58°, short stem.
  6. Filter paper, Whatman No. 1, 12.5 cm.
  7. Paper cups.

B. Reagents:

  1. Ethyl alcohol, 95%
  2. Sucrose solution, 5% sucrose in tap water (w/v) i.e. 50 g. made up to a liter.

C. Preparation of Samples:

Ground capsicums and oleoresins should be used as is. Prepare unground capsicums as directed in Method 1.0. Oleoresins should be mixed thoroughly before taking sample.

D. Procedure:

  1. Make an alcoholic extract of the sample based on anticipated pungency. Ground Capsicum should be extracted for a minimum of 16 hours. Shake occasionally. An Oleoresin sample can be dissolved and used immediately.

    Decant or filter to get a clear extract.

  2. For the material to be tasted, dilute the quantity to 50 ml. with 5% sucrose solution using pipettes and volumetric flask. In any given test start with an amount of alcoholic extract considered to be too small so that negative response will be obtained and increase the amount three out of five tasters report positive results. Record individual response to each dilution. For selection of panelists see Note 1.

    Before the first tasting and between each tasting have the individuals sip or rinse their mouth with water at 90°-100°F.

  3. For tasting, 510.1 ml. aliquots of the solutions prepared as indicated in step 3 are to be swallowed one at a time from small cups. The judgment as to whether or not heat is present is to be made between 20 and 30 seconds after swallowing. The minimum interval between tasting the solutions should be 5 minutes. (See Note 2).

  4. Tasters are to continue through the sequences of solutions until each reports a definite burn sensation. (See Note 3). Report the heat units for the first solution for which three out of the five panelists report positive.

Notes:

A panel of five reliable tasters is required.

  1. Potential panelists should be given several trials at tasting a series of solutions which is known to contain the threshold heat response. A Capsicum sample analyzed previously is suitable. The panelists' results for several days can be compared for agreement and with results of experienced individuals. It is important for potential panelists to learn their own threshold sensation to Capsicum heat. For example, where the sensation occurs in their mouth. This experience may build sufficient confidence in individuals for them to judge their own performance. Some individuals may not qualify because of extremely poor repeatability. Others may not be capable of utilizing their taste sensation. Finally the threshold level of Capsicum is not necessarily the same for each person. Results of this procedure can be biased if panelists are chosen for high or low sensitivity. A panel of five is not expected to indicate a threshold reaction on the same dilution. In fact, the pattern of positive response may include a range of dilutions.

  2. Experienced panelists who have respiratory infections, a recent exposure to highly seasoned foods or medications may be incapable of a reliable response. For this reason it is helpful to maintain experienced alternates.

  3. An experienced panel may be capable of good performance without waiting 5 minutes between solutions. But allow 1.5 hours between panel sessions.

A great deal of time will be wasted if the panel is given solutions which are far too dilute. Therefore, knowledge of approximate Scoville value is a great aid in presenting the least number of solutions. In addition, the individual preparing the extract and solutions can perform preliminary tasting. Although, this will eliminate them from immediate participation as one of the five member panel.

Also see Testing the Hotness of Pepper Sprays for more information.

Back to Top


Method 21.1 High Pressure Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

Purpose: To determine pungency levels in capsicums and their oleoresins.

 A. Apparatus: 

  1. High pressure liquid chromatograph, pump flow rate (0.6 to 1.8 ml/min).
  2. Detector
  1. UV at 280 nm, flow cell path (1 x 10 mm), greater than 700 ppm capsaicin.
  2. Fluorescence at 288 excitation, 320 emission, flow cell path of 10 x 1 micron, less than 700 ppm capsaicin.
  1. Column: C18, 10 micron spherical, 4.6 mm x250 mm.
  2. Rheodyne syringe loading sample injector with 20 microliter loop.
  3. 100 ml volumetric flask.

B. Reagents:

  1. Acetonitrile, HPLC grade.Dioxane, HPLC grade.HPLC grade water.HPLC grade methanol.2% perchloric acid.95% ethanol, saturated with sodium acetate.HPLC grade sodium acetate.
  2. Capsaicin. (Pharmaceutical quality).

C. Procedure:

  1.  Weigh sample into 100 ml. volumetric flask:
    1. 10.00 g for pungencies from 0 to 1000 ASTA Heat Units1.00 g for pungencies from 1,000 to 10,000 ASTA Heat Units
    2. 0.10 g for pungencies greater than 10,000 ASTA Heat Units
    Bring to 100 ml. with 95% ethanol saturated with sodium acetate.Cap and place on hot plate at 60 C or water bath for three hours, swirling occasionally.Swirl and allow solids to settle.Fill sample loop and elute with a mix* of: 48.4% methanol, 30.2% HPLC grade water, 13.3% dioxane, 7.9% acetonitrile, 0.2% of 2% perchloric acid.The first peak is the pigment peak, the second peak is capsaicin, the third peak is capsaicinoid.
  2. Prepare capsaicin standards at 0.01, 0.10, 1.0 mg./ml. (label 10, 100 and 1,000 ppm capsaicin) in 95% ethanol, saturated with sodium acetate.

*For low pungency capsicums (less than 700 ppm capsaicin):

  1. Prepare solvent mixture A (5.4% acetonitrile, 3.6% dioxane, 0.7% perchloric acid, 90.3% water) and B (9.0% acetonitrile, 18.0% dioxane, 73.0% methanol).
  2. Program gradient separation: At 0 min. (0% solvent B); at 2.5 min. (increase B from 0 to 60% in 5 min.); 7.5 to 12.5 min. (isocratic at 60%); 12.5 min. (60% to 100% B).

Calculation:  

  1. Total capsaicin area=Area peak 2+.82 Area peak 3.

    Capsaicin (ppm) = Total capsaicin area of sample x ppm standard x 100 / Total capsaicin area of standard xg.

    Sample ASTA Pungency=ppm capsaicin

  2. Pungency (Scoville) =ppm capsaicin x 15 (assume Capsaicin standard at 15,000,000 Scoville)

ppm capsaicin x 15 = Scoville units (assumes capsaicin = 15,000,000 Scoville)

Back to Top


Pepper Spray Concentration

Confusion abounds concerning the efficacy of various pepper (oleoresin capsicum "OC") sprays because of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission's labeling system. Often a consumer of civilian OC defense spray will see "5%" or "10%" pepper spray claims on a canister. Unfortunately, these percentages do not correlate with efficacy because they only measure the percentage of OC relative to the other ingredients in the canister. These other ingredients include the carrier for the OC, a propellant, and often marking dyes or other chemicals. An over-the-counter "10%" spray contains 10% Oleoresin Capsicum relative to the rest of the ingredients. What the OC concentration does not measure is the concentration of the active ingredients (Capsaicin) in the OC formulation. OC concentration therefore, only represents the amount of OC (oily resin) in a canister and not its strength. The heat or strength of OC is measured by the quantity of an active ingredient called Capsaicin*. Therefore, the higher the Capsaicin amount, the hotter the OC.  * Capsaicin is the ingredient within the OC that causes inflammation of mucous membranes. The reason some peppers are hotter than others is due to the amount of capsaicin. Capsaicin percentage changes depending on the pepper species, geographical origin and climatic growth conditions as well as upon oleoresin extraction and formulation processes. For example an OC spray with 5.5% concentration can be 5 times hotter than one with 10% OC concentration.

BrandnameOC Concentration Capsaicin within OC
First Defense10% 0.18%A
CAP-STUN5.5% 0.92%B

First Defense is a trademark of Defense Technology Corporation of America

A As disclosed to California Department of Justice and printed on the canister. Tested via HPLC method.

B As disclosed to California Dept. of Justice and independent laboratory test results. Tested via HPLC method.

SHU Scoville Heat Units

Laboratory Testing for Heat of Capsicum Peppers

A misconception exists that the heat of a pepper spray is best demonstrated through Scoville Heat Units (SHU). SHU testing is none other than "tongue" tasting of the OC by a panel of 5 individuals. SHU therefore depends on the subjective taste experience of the panel. The SHU test is not accurate since it depends on the individual taste sensitivity which changes from person to person and does not measure the actual chemical percentage within the product. SHU test is an appropriate test for the food spice community, however it cannot serve as the standard for OC weaponry, where an officer depends on the OC's consistent and reliable performance.Therefore, to scientifically measure the amount of Capsaicin within OC sprays, High Pressure Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)* is used to obtain exact and accurate machine data. HPLC provides an acceptable international guideline for testing the Capsaicin amount by the scientific community.

* See the Official Analytical Methods of The American Spice Trade Association (HPLC method 21.1).

Back to Top


CAP-STUN HPLC Capsaicin Test

United States Testing Company, Inc.
291 Fairfield Ave. Fairfield, New Jersey 07004. U.S.A.
Client: Zarc International, Inc.
Product Tested: CAP-STUN Weapon Systems
U.S. TESTING COMPANY, INC. IS IN NO WAY AFFILIATED WITH ZARC INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Date: October 1, 1992
File Number: 054130
Signed by: Joseph Kwiatkowski

Procedure: Analyzed in accordance with Official Analytical Methods of the ASTA, third edition 1985, Pungency of Capsicums and their Oleoresins, method 21.1.

REQUIRMENT: To identify the average Capsaicinoids quantity of samples, via High Pressure Liquid Chromatography (HPLC).

RESULT: Test resulted in 0.92% Capsaicin and meets and exceeds the standard.

Back to Top


CAP-STUN HPLC Capsaicin Test

United States Testing Company, Inc.
291 Fairfield Ave. Fairfield, New Jersey 07004. U.S.A.
Client: Zarc International, Inc.
Product Tested: CAP-STUN Weapon Systems
U.S. TESTING COMPANY, INC. IS IN NO WAY AFFILIATED WITH ZARC INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Date: October 1, 1992
File Number: 054130
Signed by: Joseph Kwiatkowski

Procedure: Analyzed in accordance with Official Analytical Methods of the ASTA, third edition 1985, Pungency of Capsicums and their Oleoresins, method 21.1.

REQUIRMENT: To identify the average Capsaicinoids quantity of samples, via High Pressure Liquid Chromatography (HPLC).

RESULT: Test resulted in 0.92% Capsaicin and meets and exceeds the standard.

Back to Top


IACP Report

iacp.JPG (10918 bytes)

 

Oleoresin Capsicum

June, 1993
By Jami Onnen

Introduction
Recent increases in violent police encounters coupled with court-imposed limitations on the use of deadly force have resulted in an almost universal demand for a safe and effective less-than-lethal (LTL) force alternative. Increased civil liability and injury-related costs have further necessitated the development of a viable force option. Oleoresin Capsicum (OC) has generated sizable interest and has subsequently become a popular LTL option for many law enforcement agencies. OC is a naturally occurring agent found in cayenne peppers. Purportedly safe, effective, and relatively inexpensive, OC may reduce the potential for excessive force complaints, civil litigation and injury-related expenditures.

Despite extensive field application, few formal evaluative studies of OC have been conducted. Moreover, there exists no forum in which relevant information may be disseminated or policy concerns may be addressed. This paper unifies existing information into a general review that law enforcement administrators may use to guide policy decisions. Further, this paper examines specific concerns often voiced by the law enforcement community regarding OC adoption and utilization. Such issues include product safety and efficacy, agent selection, training protocols, and liability considerations.

Irritant Versus Inflammatory
Traditional chemical agents such as Chloroaceto- phenone (CN) and Ortho/Chlorobenzal-Malononitrile (CS) have been used by law enforcement officers for many years. These chemical irritants are tearing agents that rapidly induce profuse watering and involuntary closing of the eyes upon application. While still considered effective for tactical use, CS/CN have recently fallen into some disfavor for patrol officer use. Agent side effects include possible burning and/or depigmentation of the exposed skin. Problems associated with decontamination also exist. Due to the microparticulate nature of chemical irritants, they tend to persist in exposed areas. Cross-contamination of officers and the environment (e.g. patrol cars, booking areas, holding cells, etc.) is also common. Chemical agents are not optimally effective on certain persons including those with a high threshold for pain, those who are under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol, and those who are mentally ill or extremely agitated. Acting on the central nervous system, chemical irritants induce pain by activating receptor cells via neural transmitters within the brain. Consequently, any interruption of this process (e.g. by drugs or endorphins) may result in diminished registered pain levels.

Unlike traditional chemical irritants, OC is a naturally occurring inflammatory agent. Also, the mechanism of action differs substantially: OC works by inflammation whereas CN and CS work by irritation. An organic oily resin derived from the pepper plant, OC is currently used for pharmacologic (e.g. as a topical analgesic) and food spicing purposes. No special decontamination procedures are required for OC because it is biodegradable and, unlike chemical irritants, it will not persist in clothing or affected areas. Ensuring proper ventilation and access to water and removing any contact lenses are the suggested decontamination procedures.

As an inflammatory agent, OC causes an almost immediate swelling of the eyes and breathing passages. Additionally, there is an intense burning sensation of the eyes, throat, and sprayed areas of the skin. When the agent is inhaled, the respiratory tract is inflamed and breathing is restricted, being limited to short and shallow breaths. Physical effects may include involuntary closing of the eyes, coughing choking lack of upper body strength and coordination, and nausea. Psychological effects such as disorientation and fear may also occur. When properly used, OC is purportedly quite effective on both humans and animals. Furthermore, the cumulative physical and psychological effects of OC render the agent serviceable for use on intoxicated or agitated individuals (Nowicki, 25). DuVemay notes that the resultant effects of OC application (i.e. labored and restricted breathing) do not support high levels of physical activity such as fighting with police officers (DuVemay, 15).

Because of its effectiveness on animals, many postal and utility workers carry the agent for animal control Domestic dogs of various breeds have been successfully controlled, without injury to the animal by the application of the OC agent (Public Safety Academy, 18). However, Nowicki notes that attack-trained dogs may not be stopped by OC. In addition, sprayed dogs may become more aggressive upon recovery. Standard decontamination procedures, including access to water and proper ventilation, should be employed when OC is used on dogs (Nowicki, 25).

Legal and Medical Issues
Currently, OC is not regulated by the Food and Drug Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency, or the Consumer Product Safety Council. However, OC has been examined by non-regulatory government and private research organizations. A two-year study conducted by the FBI Firearms Training Unit in cooperation with the U.S. Army Chemical Research and Development Center (CRDEC), revealed no long-term health risks associated with the use of OC. The FBI reported that no side effects or adverse reactions were experienced by 899 subjects who were exposed to OC agents (Weaver and Jett, 6). The CRDEC further reported that neither mutagenic nor carcinogenic effects were found on laboratory animals exposed to OC via gastrointestinal doses, subcutaneous injections, droplets to the eyed and skin patch tests (Weaver and Jett, 2).

Regarding OC use on persons with pre-existing respiratory conditions, Fuller, Dixon, and Barnes found no significant difference in either the magnitude or duration of Bronchoconstriction between normal, smoking or asthmatic subjects (Fuller, Dixon, and Barnes, 1080-1084). A private research facility, Occupational Health Services, Inc., contracted by the Kansas City, Missouri, Police Department, reports that the use of OC on persons with respiratory problems could, in rare instances, cause death. However, they contend that such an occurrence is statistically improbable, noting that none of the 899 FBI subjects (a percentage of whom probably had, like the general population, pre-existing respiratory ailments) reported any adverse reactions (Bowers, 3).

Presently, there is no known Litigation resulting from the use of OC. The FBI Firearms Training Unit reported that they are unaware of any lawsuits filed as a result of OC application (Weaver and left, 2). Moreover, various courts have upheld the use of traditional chemical irritants when properly utilized (Baltimore County, Maryland, Police Department, 12). It may thus be logically inferred that any subsequent OC-related Litigation will be similarly resolved.

Existing Assessments 
Anecdotal reports of agent effectiveness are favorable. Officers from the Sarasota County, Florida, Sheriff's Department (Hoffmeister, April 1992) and the Fairfax County, Virgins, Police Department report immediate benefits upon completion of training (Sines, April 28,1993). Significant reductions in officer and arrested injuries have been reported. After 360 documented uses, occurring over a two-and-a-half year period, the New Britain, Connecticut, Police Department reports that OC was effective 95% of the time with no injuries to officers or subjects (Nowicki, 25). Similarly, the Springfield, Missouri, Police Department experienced a 30% decrease in subject injury complaints within one year of OC adoption (Ijmes, April 28,1993). No official complaints have been lodged against the Kansas City Missouri, Police Department after 409 documented OC uses (Mitchell October 1, 1992). The Sarasota County, Florida, Sheriffs Department Likewise notes that during the first six months of OC field use, no complaints were filed (Hoffmeister, April 1992). Regarding product effectiveness on inebriated/agitated persons, the Alaska State Troopers report that OC agents received an "effective" rating nine out of ten times when used on intoxicated individuals (Stockard, April 28,1993).

Product Selection
Once an administrator has decided to adopt OC as a force alternative, several product selection choices must be made. Currently, a variety of vendors market OC products, which differ on several dimensions. Chief J.P. Morgan of the Goldsboro, North Carolina, Police Department notes that the main difference between the various OC products is the delivery or carrier system, which may utilize either flammable or nonflammable carrier agents (Morgan 22). Flammable delivery systems use isopropyl alcohol, which although not readily combustible, is ignitable. Nonflammable carrier systems, using Freon, Dymel or methylene chloride are also available. However, some of these are either ozone depleting toxic, or carcinogenic (Pilant, 50). To address these concerns both water-based carrier systems and environmentally friendly propellants such as nitrogen and carbon dioxide, are being more commonly used. Other product considerations include price, range, trigger mechanism (mist, fog or stream), concentration, and strength of the active pepper ingredient (Pilant, 50).

To decide which product is appropriate and serviceable, managers must first determine in what types of incidents and in what manner the spray will be used. For example, Chief Morgan determined that since the primary departmental use of OC would be for routine patrol, rather than crowd dispersement, isopropyl alcohol would be an acceptable carrier. Conversely, a nonflammable carrier was selected for rare, tactical/SWAT-type incidents where saturation might be necessary (Morgan, 22). Determination of product appropriateness should occur after a careful pre-use evaluation including other municipal officials (e.g. fire and rescue personnel), attorneys and departmental insurance carriers.

Operational Considerations
There is a consensus among law enforcement officers regarding the position of OC on the use-of-force continuum. Because there are no verified long-term physical effects or health risks associated with OC use, it is usually ranked just above hands-on pain compliance and immediately below the use of impact weapons.

Standard operating procedures generally mandate that OC is appropriate for use with actively hostile individuals who have resisted verbal commands, when physical control techniques are warranted, or when officer injury is possible and/or anticipated. However, current departmental policies concerning the application and escalation of force should not be altered with the adoption of OC. Officers must be provided with the discretion to quickly and safely apply the appropriate level of force to meet situations involving arrest or officer self-defense. Policy guidelines regarding OC use must be developed and clearly defined. At a minimum, guidelines should consider issues related to the following appropriateness of agent use, necessity of warnings prior to application, decontamination procedures, incident documentation, and possible sanctions for indiscriminate use.

Thorough training in the use of OC is critical because it enhances product effectiveness, protects the officer and the agency during litigation, and ensures both officer and suspect safety. DuVernay holds that proper training should be comprehensive, going beyond the technical aspects of the munition (such as the symptomatic effects, first-aid and decontamination protocols). Legal and tactical issues must also be examined. Tactical issues include application techniques, verbal commands, and proper physical positioning. Product manufacturers and private companies offer user and instructor training (DuVernay, 15).

Caveats should also be considered as part of the formal training. Trainers (e.g., Nowicki, 27) report that because of OC's high level of effectiveness and low potential for long lasting physical injury, a tactical over-reliance on the product may occur. Some chiefs have been tempted to forego other less-than-lethal alternatives in lieu of the "cop in a can" (Pilant, 51). A false sense of psychological security may also be engendered by the product. Morgan reports that a patrol officer, in response to an offer for backup, confidently commented that "I don't need one, I got my OC" (Morgan, 26). Trainers and vendors emphasize that no device, including OC, is universally effective. Consequently, OC should supplement rather than replace other tactics and control techniques.

Conclusion
Reports indicate that use of OC may result in reduced use-of-force complaints, civil litigation, and injury to officers and subjects. Furthermore, field tests suggest that the agent is reasonably effective on dogs and intoxicated/agitated persons. Because of the agent's natural product origin, various operational legal, and medical issues are mitigated: agent application and decontamination protocols are basic; courts are expected to uphold OC use; and the potential for permanent or long-lasting physical injury is improbable. While not a panacea, OC is currently considered an effective and reliable less-than-lethal force alternative.

Works Cited

Baltimore County, Maryland, Police Department. Oleoresin Capsicum Spray Pepper Maw 1992

Bowers Sgt. H. Craig, Kansas City, Missouri Police Department. Internal memorandum to Capt. Charles Rice. "Analysis and Testing of CAP-STUN." February 15, 1991.

DuVernay, B. "When Compliance Is Needed: What Chemical Agent To Spray and How To Spray It." Police February, 1993.

Fuller, RW., C.M. Dixon and P.J. Barnes. "Bronchoconstrictor Response to Inhaled Capsicum in Humans." Journal of Applied Physiology, 58 (4): 1080-1084.

Hoffemeister, Lt. G.K "CAP-STUN." Defensive Tactics Newsletter. April 1992.1 (4).

Ijmes, Lt. Steve, Springfield, Missouri Police Department. Telephone interview. April 28, 1993.

 

Morgan J.P. "Oleoresin Capsicum Police Considerations." Police Chief. August, 1992 LIX (8).

Nowicki E "Oleoresin Capsicum: A Non-Lethal Force Alternative." Law Enforcement Technology. January, 1993.

Pilant, Lois. "Spotlight on Non-Lethal Weapons." Police Chief. May, 1993: LX (5).

Public Safety Academy, Fairfax County, Virginia Police Department. Oleoresin Capsicum Chemical Agent Study. September, 1991.

Sines, Lt. Col. E. Thomas, Fairfax County, Virginia, Police Department. Telephone interview. April 28, 1993.

Stockard Lt. C., Alaska State Troopers. Telephone Interview. April 28, 1993.

Weaver, Wayne and Monty B. Jett. Oleoresin Capsicum Training and Use Firearms Training Unit, FBI Academy. Quantico, Virginia. 1989.

Back to Top