The views expressed in this paper are those of the
authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department
of the Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the US Government. This paper is approved
for public release by OASD/PA and SAF/PAS (with the following disclaimer). Distribution is
unlimited.
"Many of the weapon concepts described in this paper
are merely proposals. Except where specifically identified in official Department of
Defense documents, none of the concepts in this paper should be interpreted to be funded
R&D programs or operational weapon systems possessed by the Department of
Defense."
* * * * * * *
Comments pertaining to this paper are invited and should be
forwarded to:
Director, USAF Institute for National Security
Studies
HQ USAFA/DFES
2354 Fairchild Drive, Suite 5L27
USAF Academy, CO 80840
phone: 719-333-2717
fax: 719-333-2716
email: hayspl.dfe@usafa.af.mil
Visit the Institute for National Security
Studies home page at http://www.usafa.af.mil/inss
* * * * * * *
ABOUT THE EDITOR:
Dr Robert J. Bunker is an adjunct professor,
National Security Studies program, California State University, San Bernardino, and
professor, Unconventional Warfare, American Military University, Manassas Park, Virginia.
His research focus is on the influence of technology on warfare and political organization
and on the national security implications of emerging modes of warfare. He served as a
concept assessor to the US Air Force Project 2025 study.
The editor would like to thank the following individuals in
addition to those listed on the next page for their contributions to this work: Dr Glenn
W. Goodman, Jr., Dr Mark T. Clark, Amy Wittman, and Scott Boris, as well as the
institutional support of Armed Forces Journal International and Defense
News.
ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTORS:
Dr John B. Alexander is a retired Army Colonel with
assignments ranging from command of Special Forces A-Teams in Thailand and Vietnam to
Directorship of the Advanced Systems Concepts Office, U.S. Army Laboratory Command. From
1992-1995 he was the Program Manager for Nonlethal Defense, Special Technologies Group,
Nonproliferation and International Security Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory. He
currently holds many positions including that of US Delegate to a NATO Advisory Group.
Col Rex Applegate is a retired Army officer whose
career in unconventional warfare included assignments with the Office of Strategic
Services (OSS), Military Police and Counterintelligence. He is a recognized international
authority on nonlethal weapons having been involved in projects relating to their
development during the period 1960-75. His book on riot control is considered the
principle work in this subject area by many police forces.
Mr Jon B. Becker is the CEO & President of
Aardvark Tactical, Inc., a California based provider of less-lethal munitions and
training. His business was the primary contractor for less-lethal munitions and training
for Operation United Shield in Somalia.
Lt Col Matt Begert, USMC, is the Military Assistant
to the Director, Precision Guided Weapons Countermeasures Test and Evaluation Directorate,
an OSD field activity. His operational experience includes instructor duty for the A-6
Intruder, extensive deployment to the Pacific and operations as a small team leader
attached to US Army and allied special operations units for interoperable fire support.
Expeditionary experience includes aircraft carrier deployment in the Indian Ocean and air
operations in the Persian Gulf War.
Mr Jaime H. Cuadros is the founder of Arts and
Engineering, a firm dedicated to the study and development of less-lethal kinetic energy
projectiles and weapons; together with the art of watercolor painting. Arts and
Engineering has designed improved shotbags (for the 12 gauge shotgun) and a 19 mm
close-range rubber bullet system for police use.
Mr Abraham Flatau, formerly Chief of Weapons Systems
Concepts Team, US Army Armament Research and Development Command. Conceived and directed
research and development projects in unconventional weaponry, including Ring Airfoil
Grenade (RAG) and tubular projectiles. From 1984 to 1988 served as technical advisor to
Director, Advanced Systems and Technology Division, Aerojet Ordnance Company.
CWO-5 Charles "Sid" Heal, USMCR, saw
service in the Vietnam and Persian Gulf Wars and was the Mobile Training Team leader for
nonlethal options in Operation United Shield in Somalia. He has over 22 years of law
enforcement experience and is a national authority on diversionary devices and a court
recognized expert in law enforcement special operations and emergency management.
FOREWORD
We believe you will find this reference book to be a useful
addition to the current literature on nonlethal weapons. Its target audience is
individuals who deal with special operations, weapons procurement and sales, and military
operations other than war. It also complements other handbook literature of this type,
such as Weapons of Mass Destruction Terms Handbook (Alexandria, VA: Defense Special
Weapons Agency, May 1997), and Nuclear Terms Handbook 1996 (Washington, D.C.: U.S.
Department of Energy, 1996). The need for such a handbook on nonlethal weapons and
associated technology has grown along with the perception that U.S. forces will
increasingly use such systems in the post-Cold War global security environment. We hope
that this comprehensive handbook will help to contribute a sense of the technological
limitations of nonlethal weapons, as well as provide clarity and consistency in
discussions on the future of U.S. national security policy.
About the Institute
INSS is primarily sponsored by the National Security Policy
Division, Nuclear and Counterproliferation Directorate, Headquarters US Air Force
(USAF/XONP) and the Dean of the Faculty, US Air Force Academy. Our other current sponsors
include: the Air Staff's Directorate for Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance
(USAF/XOI); OSD Net Assessment; the Defense Special Weapons Agency; the Army Environmental
Policy Institute; Army Space Command; and the On-Site Inspection Agency. The mission of
the Institute is to promote national security research for the Department of Defense
within the military academic community, and to support the Air Force national security
education program. Its primary purpose is to promote research in fields of interest to
INSS' sponsors: international security policy (especially arms control and
counterproliferation), Air Force planning issues, regional security policy, conflict in
the information age (including the revolution in military affairs and information
warfare), environmental security, and space policy.
INSS coordinates and focuses outside thinking in various
disciplines and across services to develop new ideas for USAF policy making. The Institute
develops topics, selects researchers from within the military academic community, and
administers sponsored research. It also edits books and hosts conferences and workshops
that facilitate the dissemination of information to a wide range of private and government
organizations. INSS is in its fifth year of providing valuable, cost-effective research to
meet the needs of the Air Staff and our other sponsors. We appreciate your continued
interest in INSS and its research products.
PETER L. HAYS, Lt Colonel, USAF
Director, Institute for National Security Studies
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this paper is to promote an
understanding of and research into a new category of weapons, designated "nonlethal" by the military services. These weapons are also classified as
"less-than-lethal" or "less-lethal" by law enforcement agencies.
National security experts consider these weapons increasingly important in the post-Cold
War era. This type of weapon has been used throughout history, but was given new emphasis
during the Vietnam War era. Law enforcement agencies and Army national guard units relying
upon traditional forms of politico-military force were ineffective in countering US
domestic civil unrest. As similar types of conflict, now many magnitudes greater, seem to
dominate international politics since the end of the Cold War, this type of weapon takes
on increasing importance.
The Department of Defense defines these weapons as follows:
Weapons that are explicitly designed and primarily employed
so as to incapacitate personnel or materiel, while minimizing fatalities, permanent injury
to personnel, and undesired damage to property and the environment. Unlike conventional
lethal weapons that destroy their targets principally through blast, penetration and
fragmentation, non-lethal weapons employ means other than gross physical destruction to
prevent the target from functioning. Non-lethal weapons are intended to have one, or both,
of the following characteristics: a. they have relatively reversible effects on personnel
or materiel, b. they affect objects differently within their area of influence [229:1-2].
We have followed this Western definition of nonlethal
weapons in this paper, but have also included what would be considered non-Western forms
of weaponry. The reason for the inclusion of these weapons, which specifically are
designed to result in permanent injury to personnel, is because of the great likelihood
that they will be used against US forces in future conflicts.
Our intent is to create an initial term and reference
listing that will help support joint-force and dual-use initiatives focused on identifying
the potential drawbacks of integrating nonlethal weapons into our military services and
law enforcement agencies. Because of the limited objective of this paper, it consists
solely of two sections: a list of terms that describes nonlethal weapons along with the
concepts both surrounding and inhibiting their use and a comprehensive listing of
references to facilitate further research. The category of nonlethal weapons that offers
the capability for information warfare has not been included in this paper because of its
association with that distinct form of conflict.
The terms and descriptions provided within this paper
should not be considered authoritative, static, or comprehensive. Rather, they represent a
point of departure from which further research can be conducted and eventual definitions
created as these weapons begin the slow and tedious process of being adapted for
operational use. This paper offers a candid assessment of our current understanding of
nonlethal weapons that undoubtedly contains inaccuracies, either directly or by omission.
Bearing these caveats in mind, we have attempted to
create a fairly comprehensive overview of the terms and concepts relating to nonlethals
and the works available for reference on this topic. The contributors to this paper
represent some of our country's "best and brightest" in the field of nonlethal
weapons research, development, training and operational employment. Their combined
expertise spans the early years of the development of nonlethal weapons from the Vietnam
War era, including their employment in the Somali operation and in recent domestic law
enforcement disturbances, to newer systems still in the process of being developed and
field tested.
Nonlethal weapons cannot be thought of in a "business as usual" sense or, for that matter, solely as a new type of force
multiplier. It is the opinion of the editor (and most of the contributors to this paper)
that when nonlethal weapons are ready for wide-scale application, this will signal a
development as significant in magnitude as the emergence of gunpowder based firearms
during the European Renaissance. Just as the firearm gave the ability for distance-killing
that destroyed a Western ban existing since the time of the Iliad, the introduction
of nonlethals may allow for tailored employment of politico-military force and challenge
the accepted definition of warfare.
The US military will need to undertake significant
organizational and doctrinal restructuring in order to exploit the potential of these new
weapons. The most important near-term application of nonlethal technology appears to be in
areas such as: operations in "failed states," as a counter to the non-Western
form of warfare that is emerging globally, as a defense against the specter of further
terrorist assaults upon our homeland, and as a means of responding to civil unrest in many
of our inner cities. Over the longer term, it is their fit with other nascent warfighting
trends embodied in the revolution in political and military affairs (RPMA) that is of
paramount significance. For example, nonlethal weapons could present new and potentially
highly effective mechanisms for dealing with an advanced form of battlespace (i.e.
cyberspace) and the criminally-based non-state soldier (i.e. terrorist, mercenary or
"new-warrior class") as a challenger to the Western nation-state's domination of
political violence.
In order to respond to these and other challenges, we must
insure that our armed services retain the capability to dominate the battlefields of the
21st century. Our ability to use nonlethal weapons effectively will be a critical
component of our future capabilities. It is toward improving our knowledge in that
endeavor that this paper has been written.
Robert J. Bunker
December 1996
Nonlethal
Weapons:
Terms and References
TERM LISTING
As listed in the table of contents, the entries in this
paper are organized into seventeen categories for nonlethal weapons technology and five
areas for concepts associated with the use of nonlethal technology. The citation protocol
for entries list the reference material number and the page number as follows: [Reference
Number: Page Number]. If an entire document is cited, no page numbers are given. For the
purpose of accuracy, many terms have been directly quoted from a single referenced source,
while others combined reference sources.
I. Nonlethal Weapons
A. Acoustics
Acoustic Beam. High power, very low
frequency beam emitted from weaponry under development. Envisioned to be a piston-driven
or detonation-driven pulser which forces compressed air into tubes to generate a low
frequency wave [543,546].
Acoustic, Blast Wave, Projector. Energy
generation from a pulsed laser that will project a hot, high pressure plasma in the air in
front of a target. It creates a blast wave with variable but controlled effects on
hardware and troops [543].
Acoustic Bullets. High power, very low
frequency waves emitted from one to two meter antenna dishes. Results in blunt object
trauma from waves generated in front of the target. Effects range from discomfort to
death. A Russian device that can propel a 10-hertz sonic bullet the size of a baseball
hundreds of yards is thought to exist. Proposed fixed site defense [16,113,212,543]. Also
known as sonic bullets.
Acoustic, Curdler Unit. A device which is
plugged into an HPS-1 sound system to produce a shrill shrieking, blatting noise. It is
used to irritate and disperse rioters and had a decibel range just below that of the
danger level to the human ear. It is used in night operations to produce a "voodoo" effect and effectively breaks up chanting, singing and clapping
[2:279-280,82:184,84,529].
Acoustic, Deference Tones. Devices which can
project a voice or other sound to a particular location. The resulting sound can only be
heard at that location [176:86].
Acoustic, Doppler Effect Alarm. Any movement
in the area between a transmitter and a receiver causes a slight variation in the sound
pattern received. By measuring this variation an alarm system can be made to be activated
[23:204].
Acoustic, High Intensity Sound. Loud music
was used by American forces to drive Manual Norriega from the Vatican Embassy in
Panama in 1990. Also known as polysound [354:45].
Acoustic, HPS-1 Sound System. A 350 watt
sound system with an audible voice range of 2 1/2 miles. Used by the military in
Indo-China and then supplied to law enforcement. First used by police forces at San
Francisco State College and at Berkeley in the 1960s [2:277-279,82,84]. See also Acoustic,
Curdler Unit.
Acoustic, Infrasound.
Very low-frequency sound which can travel long distances and easily penetrate most
buildings and vehicles. Transmission of long wavelength sound creates biophysical effects;
nausea, loss of bowels, disorientation, vomiting, potential internal organ damage or death
may occur. Superior to ultrasound because it is "in band" meaning that its does
not lose its properties when it changes mediums such as from air to tissue. By
1972 an infrasound generator had been built in France which generated waves at 7 hertz.
When activated it made the people in range sick for hours [23,302,546].
Acoustic, Squawk Box. Crowd dispersal weapon
field tested by the British Army in Ireland in 1973. This directional device emits two
ultrasonic frequencies which when mixed in the human ear become intolerable. It produces
giddiness, nausea or fainting. The beam is so small that is can be directed at specific
individuals in a riot situation [451,452,504].
Acoustic, Teleshot. Cartridge projecting a
powerful sonic device delivered by a 12-gauge shotgun. Experimental use in 1972 [529].
Acoustic, Ultrasound. A very high frequency
sound whose wavelength is "out of band" making it less effective than infrasound
because it losses its properties when it changes mediums. Example, from air to human
tissue. Like infrasound a lot of power is required to generate these waves which create
biophysical effects. See also Acoustic, Infrasound.
B.
Acoustics & Opticals
Acoustic & Optical, Air Burst Simulator.
A diversionary device normally used to simulate the air burst of artillery rounds during
infantry training. The device is fired via a 37-40mm launching device and has an 8 second
fuze prior to ignition.
Acoustic & Optical, Cod-Weight. A heavy,
(2 pounds or greater) weight to which a diversionary device is attached to allow it to be
thrown through window screens, window glass, bushes and similar materials. The name is
derived from the original weights used for deep-sea fishing for Cod.
Acoustic & Optical, Diversionary Device.
A hand thrown pyrotechnic device which emits a loud bang and dazzling light when ignited.
The device is designed to create a sensory overload which temporarily causes confusion and
an inability to effectively respond to a tactical team's actions. Sometimes called a
flash-bang grenade.
Acoustic & Optical, Diversionary Device,
Launched. A diversionary device which can be launched from a 12 gauge shot gun
[373].
Acoustic & Optical, Flash Stick. A stick
or pole to which a diversionary device is affixed, allowing it to be precisely placed and
held during ignition. Often used for exact insertion through chain link fences, windows,
heavy brush and so forth.
Acoustic & Optical, Painter's Pole. An
extendible pole to which a diversionary device is affixed allowing it to be precisely
placed and held during ignition. Often used for supporting second story entries from
beneath. The name is derived from the pole used by painters to hold paint rollers when
painting overhead.
Acoustic & Optical, Photic Driver. A
crowd control device developed by a British company prior to 1973 which uses ultrasound
and flashing infrared lights which penetrate closed human eyelids. Potential for epileptic
fits because of the stroboscopic flashing effect. May have been employed by South African
Police during interrogations [23,450].
Acoustic & Optical, Psycho-Correction. A
technology invented by a Russian scientist that involves influencing subjects visually or
aurally with imbedded subliminal messages [318].
Acoustic & Optical, Stun Grenade. A
non-lethal grenade, XM84, in development to be used by Army military police [338].
C. Antilethals
Antilethal. Technologies which provide
counter-sniper, counter-mortar, antimissile and high-precision weapons capabilities.
Advanced forms of camouflage and sensors which defeat lethal weapons are additional forms
of this technology [418:24].
Antilethal, Camouflage-Active. Created by
dynamically matching the object to be camouflaged to its background colors and light
levels rendering it virtually invisible to the eye. This is conceptually the same
camouflage process as that used by a chameleon. This is accomplished through a
sophisticated color and light sensor array which detects an object's background color and
brightness. This data is then computer matched and reproduced on a pixel array covering
the viewing service of the object to be camouflaged. Also known as chameleon camouflage
[245,302].
Antilethal, Camouflage-Metamorphic. Uniforms
or paint which change color due to either light or heat sensitivity. Extremely useful for
night and day operations and those taking place in urban environments [245,302].
Antilethal, Counter-Sniper.
Electronic sniper-locating systems based on acoustic, shock wave or infrared measuring
technologies. Provides the location of a hostile sniper to a sniper team or to an
automated counter-sniper system which can fire either a kinetic round or a low-energy
laser at the hostile sniper [2:300-301,505].
Antilethal, Electronic-False Target Generation.
An electronic device that creates and presents an image of a target to a precision
laser-guided weapon that causes that weapon to aim at the false target. Used as a
countermeasure to those precision guided weapons [468:14].
Antilethal, Electronic-Shell
Detonator. A system fielded by U.S. troops in Bosnia which creates an
electronic field that causes mortar and artillery shells to explode prematurely by
signaling to them that they have reached their target [183].
Antilethal, Electromagnetic Shielding. A form
of defense against microwave attack. A metal box, known as a "Faraday Cage," can
sometimes function as one by excluding electromagnetic fields [356:39].
Antilethal, Food Bomb. Humanitarian use of
nonlethal weapons. Place concentrated food pellets rather than anti-personnel bomblets in
a cluster bomb unit. For use in cities under siege on the verge of starvation [609].
Antilethal, Laser Protection. Protection is
achieved in three ways: absorption using dyes, reflected using optical coatings and the
blocking of specific wavelengths [287].
Antilethal, Laser Protection-BLPS. Ballistic
and Laser Protective Spectacles. Since 1988, these devices have been issued
to high priority Army and Marine Corps units. The BLPS are dye-filled polycarbonate
plastic filters which will protect eyesight against the low-energy lasers most likely
encountered on today's battlefield, specifically the two or three wave lengths used by
common range finders and target designators based on Nd:YAG and ruby lasers. They will not
give protection against frequency-agile low energy laser weapons [1:185].
Antilethal, Laser
Protection-Smoke. Smoke's attenuative properties allow it to serve as a
passive defense against blinding laser weaponry. Large-area smoke generation may provide a
means to offer continuous protection for forward elements of U.S. combat forces [115:38].
Antilethal, Low Energy
Laser. An Air Force project, known as Have Glance, in which a pod-mounted, low
energy laser would be mounted on an aircraft to confuse the heat-seeking function of
infrared missiles [1:161].
Antilethal, RPG Barrier. See Barrier, Fence-RPG.
Antilethal, Sensor-Acoustic. Remote
acoustic sensors placed in an area overwatch position in urban zones to detect and locate
gunfire within that area [429].
Antilethal, Sensor-Facial Recognition
Technology. Experimental information systems which recognize human facial
features and compare them to databases of wanted suspects. Great potential for
apprehending terrorists in airport terminals and criminals in large crowds. More advanced
subdermal systems will be required as a follow-on to these systems as a counter to
criminals/non-state soldiers who surgically alter their facial features [642].
Antilethal, Sensor-Ground Penetrating Radar.
Sensor that can detect nongeologic objects and human engineered structures beneath the
ground by analyzing the return of electromagnetic waves traveling through geologic
structures. Detection of buried mines and discovery/mapping of underground bunkers
represent practical, nonlethal applications [215:10].
Antilethal, Sensor-Nonimaging Portable
Radar. A radar unit which weighs less than 10 pounds, uses rechargeable
batteries, is small enough to fit into a briefcase and will detect motion through
nonmetallic walls and floors. Using sounds instead of images, it detects motion and can
transmit to a receiver up to a distance of 200 feet [302].
Antilethal, Sensor-Retroreflectivity.
A theory based on the reflection of light. Common example is seeing an animal's eyes at
night in your headlights. Allows for an electro-optical sensing mode that can be used to
find opposing electroptics looking into the night for location and targeting purposes.
Antilethal, Smart Gun. A gun which can only
be used by the proper user or users. Identification is automatic and would be carried out
by radio frequency signals or other technologies [620].
Antilethal, Smart Metals. See Markers, Smart Metals.
Antilethal, White Light Goggles. Experimental
goggles which "gate out" bright white light so that the user will not be
affected by them along with the targets [330:6].
D. Antiplant Agents
Antiplant Agent. Compounds used to
destroy plants or crops function in one of two general ways. Growth regulators and
desiccants kill or defoliate by stimulating the leaf fall process (growth regulator) or by
drying the leaf blade (desiccant). The other category, soil sterilizers, contaminate the
soil, preventing or retarding growth. Uses of antiplant agents include destruction of
crops and foliant removal to deny/degrade camouflage [13:77-78].
Antiplant Agent Blue. Fast acting antiplant
desiccant containing sodium dimethyl. The desiccant, unlike anti-plant growth regulators,
works by drying the leaf blade of the plant rather than simulating the plant's leaf fall
process [13:77-78].
Antiplant Agent, Defoliants. Any of a variety
of chemical compounds that either stimulate the leaf fall process, dry the leaf blade or
sterilize the soil [13:77-78].
Antiplant Agent, Operation Ranch Hand. A
defoliation program conducted during the Vietnam War from 1962 to 1970. The primary
purpose of the operation was to deny cover to enemy forces, thereby making ambushes more
difficult. Crop destruction missions were also conducted in northern and eastern central
areas of South Vietnam [22:66-67].
Antiplant Agent Orange. Antiplant growth
regulator containing n-butyl esters of dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and
trichlorophenoyacetic acid. Publicized for its use in Operation Ranch Hand in the Vietnam
War from 1962-1970 [13:77-78].
Antiplant Agent Purple. Growth regulator
similar to Agent Orange but contains, in addition, the isobutyl ester of
trichlorophenoxyacetic acid [13:77-78].
Antiplant Agent White. Antiplant growth
regulator composed of a mixture of tri-iso-propanolanime salt of dichlorophenoxyacetic
acid and picloram in water [13:77-78].
E. Barriers
Barrier, Air Bag, Backseat. An
automobile airbag designed to hold in place a suspect placed in a police car. Designed
because of the frequency of violent behavior once suspects have been handcuffed and placed
in a police car for transport.
Barrier, Air Bag Mine. A nonlethal vehicular
mine based on a type of air bag [339].
Barrier, Caltrops. A personnel and vehicular
barrier device with four projecting spikes so arranged that when three of the spikes are
on the ground, the fourth points upward. The term caltrop is derived from an English water
chestnut which was used to impede the mobility of heavy cavalry during the Middle Ages.
Caltrops were used in Somalia by the Marines during United Shield to supplement key
barrier systems at night during the final hours of the withdrawal [378].
Barrier, Coating-Slick. Teflon-type
lubricants which create a slippery surface because of their chemical properties. These chemical agents reduce friction with the intent to
inhibit the free movement of the target. In the 1960s the term "Instant
Banana Peel" was coined to describe the capability provided by Riotril. When applied
to a hard surface and wetted down, this dry, relatively-inexpensive, non-toxic,
non-corrosive white powder becomes ice slick. It becomes virtually impossible for an
individual to move or stand up on a hard surface so treated. Tire-type vehicles are also
unable to get traction. Riotril, if allowed to dry, can easily be peeled away or, because
of its water-soluble nature, can also be hosed away with high-pressure streams
[2:302-303,16,91, 356,565]. Also known as low-friction polymers, slick'ems,' and
superlubricants.
Barrier, Coating-Sticky. Polymer adhesives
used to bond down equipment and human targets. Also known as stick'ems' and superadhesives
[16].
Barrier, Electronic. See Antilethal, Electronic-Shell Detonator.
Barrier, Emulsifier. Agents, contained in a
mixture of mutually insoluble liquids, which were dispersed over the Ho Chi Minh trail to
degrade the logistical lifeline of Viet Cong forces during the Vietnam War. Used in tandem
with clouding seeding. Also known as soil destabilizers [434].
Barrier, Fence-Electrical. See Electrical, Fence.
Barrier, Fence-RPG. Conventional
fencing, usually 6 ft high, with barbed wire on top. While the anti-mobility utility of
such fencing is apparent it also had an anti-lethal capability. In Vietnam this fencing
was erected as a rocket propelled grenade (RPG) screen in front of armored fighting
positions and around command vehicles. RPGs which hit this screen either had their fusing
systems disabled (RPG7's) or prematurely detonated (RPG2's). Also known as cyclone fencing
[635,637:109].
Barrier, Foam-Aqueous. Originally derived
from a fire fighting compound used to put out airplane fires. Barrier foam is a derivative
which is thicker in consistency. This technology employs a safe, biodegradable form of
suds which can be piled up to as high as four feet. Barrier foam can be applied over
fences, concertina wire, ditches to be seeded with caltrops (a four pointed device
designed to puncture tires) to prevent vehicular passage. By applying the foam over
obstacles, it impedes the ability to defeat them. Barrier foam, as its name implies, is
used to deny entry or passage. The conceptual origins of this foam date back to 1965
[2:300,82,302,378].
Barrier, Foam-Aqueous, Generator. Concept
involves blowing air through nylon net kept wet with mixture which creates aqueous foam
[529].
Barrier, Foam-Aqueous Riot Control Agent. The
ordinary suds of barrier foam can be enhanced with the addition of substances such as
oleoresin capsicum, the primary ingredient in "pepper spray," or CS [165].
Barrier, Foam-Sticky. A name given to a
polymer-based superadhesive agent. The technology first began appearing in commercial
applications such as "super glue" and quick setting foam insulation. It is
extremely persistent and is virtually impossible to remove without a liquid solvent which
has a pleasant citrus odor. The solvent can be applied as a spray or poured on. The foam
then appears to dissipate, releasing its hold and allowing suspects to be arrested and safely transported. Sticky foam came to public attention on February 28,
1995 when U.S. Marines used it in Mogadishu, Somalia, to prevent armed intruders from
impeding efforts to extricate United Nation
forces from that county [302,378].
Barrier, Foam-Sticky, Dispenser.
An interior barrier system, operated by either intruder penetration or command, which
administers a sticky-foam barrier in a passageway from floor to ceiling [506].
Barrier, Rope, Launcher. Nylon rope dispersed
by a compressed air launcher using mounted on a truck. Thirty cubic feet per minute [529].
Barrier, Smoke-Antilaser. See Antilethal, Laser Protection-Smoke.
Barrier, Smoke-Cold. A thick,
disorienting "cold smoke" which can be
generated in areas from 2,000 to 50,000 cubic feet. It restricts an intruders eye-hand
coordination and interactions among members of an intruding group [506].
Barrier, Spike. An angle-cut metal rod driven
into an unsurfaced road's wheel pit. A 1/2 inch diameter rod, protruding only about 3
inches, is blunt enough so as to not penetrate a shoe sole under a person's weight, yet a
heavy vehicle will drive it through a tire [15:92].
Barrier, Spiked Strip. Flat strip resembling
a fire hose with retractable hollow spikes designed to flatten the tires of a target
automobile. When the strip is activated, hollow spikes extend vertically and puncture the
tires as the vehicle rolls over the strip. Also known as road spikes [566:2].
Barrier, Stakes. A sharp stake, often of wood
or bamboo, that is concealed in high grass, deep mud or pits. It is often coated with
excrement, and intended to wound and infect the feet of enemy soldiers. Can be utilized
both as a booby trap and as a barrier. Commonly known as punji stick or punji stakes.
Barrier, Wire/Tape-Barbed, Launcher.
Dispensing systems for flat barbed tape and barbed wire which could be quickly deployed
into concertina form [82,529].
F. Batons
Baton,
Biotechnical-Injector. A baton with an automatic self-injecting syringe for
administering the antidote to nerve gas built into it's tip and filled with calmatives or
other biotechnical agents [165].
Baton, Breakaway. A baton made of a substance
that will break if used incorrectly [529].
Baton, Electrical.
Standard dimension baton which delivers an electric charge of low voltage, powered by
standard flash-light cells [2:240,23,529]. Also known as stun baton or shok baton.
Baton, Expandable. Measures 6" to
7" in closed position. The three telescopic sections rapidly flick open to an
extended 16" to 18". Also known as extensible billyclub [529].
Baton, Riot Control Agent. 12-26" plastic baton which is able to project riot control agents [2:211-212].
Baton, Side-Handle. A baton with a
side-handle attachment which allows it to be twirled for greater impact and used more
effectively to block an opponent's blows.
Baton, Straight. Wooden, plastic, metallic
rod from 12" to 36" used as a swung impact weapon. Can either hang from a
leather throng or be held in a holster. Smaller version, 6" to 8." Also known as
nightstick or billyclub.
Baton, Straight, Flashlight. Heavy shock
resistant flash light which can be swung like a baton.
Baton, Straight, Flashlight-Riot Control Agent. Shock
resistance polyethylene flash light. Besides providing a light source, this flashlight can
be used as a baton and to project a riot control agent [2:216].
Baton, Two-Handed Riot. The 36 in. long riot
baton is employed like a rifle and bayonet-- overhead blows could be fatal. Short,
one-handed batons are not appropriate for close-quarter riot actions [74,95].
G. Biotechnicals
Biotechnical, Behavior-Altering Drugs. See Biotechnical, Calmatives. Suggested delivery in a gaseous
form for terrorist and hostage situations in 1987 [556].
Biotechnical, Biodegrading Microbes.
Microbes which turn storage tanks full of aviation fuel into useless jelly. Such microbes
may produce acids or enzymes which can be tailored to degrade almost anything, even
concrete and metal, so their potential use as nonlethal weapons could be extensive
[171:2,356:38].
Biotechnical, Calmatives.
Biotechnical agents which are sedatives or sleep-inducing drugs; includes alfentinil,
fentanyls, ketamine and BZ. Several of them make ideal choices for this application when
mixed with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), which promotes absorption through skin to quickly
sedate persons contacted. DMSO introduces the calmative agent into the bloodstream by
increasing the epidermal absorption rate by about 1,000 percent. The explosion of a flash
bang (sometimes called a diversionary device) represents one method of dispersing DMSO and
a calmative agent. Calmatives were reportedly used by the Soviets against the Mujahideen
in Afghanistan [16,176:83,302,431,556]. Also known as sleep agents.
Biotechnical, Disease Organisms. Nonfatal
diseases targeted toward troops and civilians. Such viral agents were developed by Iraq to
be used against Western forces during the Gulf War so as to create long term disabling
injuries. Agents being considered for use were those that cause hemorrhagic
conjunctivitis, chronic diarrhea, yellow fever and Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever [627].
Biotechnical, DM. Diphenylaminechloroarsine.
A sickening agent no longer in use by the military because of health risks. Probably ruled
out of use in Vietnam by October, 1965. Effects include sneezing, shortness of breath,
retching and vomiting, hemorrhaging, and possible death. Mixed with CN for immediate
effect [13:19,529].
Biotechnical, Genetic Alteration. The act of
changing genetic code to create a desired less-than-lethal but longterm disablement
effect, perhaps for generations, thereby creating a societal burden.
Biotechnical, Hypodermic Syringe-Dart.
Modified shotgun or handgun in which the projectile is a drug-filled syringe activated by
a small charge on impact. Wide variety of drugs available including emetic (vomiting)
agents [2:293,165,529].
Biotechnical, Injector-Baton. See Baton, Biotechnology- Injector.
Biotechnical, Malodorous Agents.
Foul-smelling gases and sprays such as hydrogen sulphide (H2S) or a compound
known as NaS8 which is used in making plastics. Could be delivered by a
grenade. Past work on "cultural specific" agents has also been undertaken
[356,529]. See also Biotechnical, Project Agile.
Biotechnical, Neuro-Implant. Computer
implants into the brain which allow for behavioral modification and control. Current
research is experimental in nature and focuses on lab animals such as mice [636].
Biotechnical, Pheromones. The
chemical substances released by animals to influence physiology or behavior of other
members of the same species. One use of pheromones, at the most elemental level, could be
to mark target individuals and then release bees to attack them. This would result in
forcing them to exit an area or abandon resistance [195].
Biotechnical, Project
Agile. Series of military science studies in Asia conducted by Battele
Memorial Institute in May 1966 for Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA). One such
study centered on developing 'stink' bombs which were race specific [320].
Biotechnical, Wetware.
Advanced technology devices which are surgically implanted into the body rather than worn.
These devices can be used to enhance memory and the human senses, modify behavior or to
locate allied troops. Pacemakers represent an early form of wetware. New concept developed
in this document.
H.
Electricals
Electrical, Armored Personnel Carrier.
Standard armored personnel carrier fitted with a gate-like apparatus in the front and
charged to a high voltage. Used by West German police to clear streets or round up small
groups of people [165].
Electrical, Baton. See Baton, Electrical.
Electrical, Fence. A fence which delivers a nonlethal electrical shock. It can be employed as an
effective barrier against intruders [74:66].
Electrical, Flashlight. A type of flashlight
designed with electrodes on the base. Effective range is minimal [556].
Electrical, Glove. A glove with an electric
impulse generator in the palm and the bottom sides of the glove fingers. A close-in device
similar to the electric stun gun and the electric flashlight [556].
Electrical, High-Voltage Telsa Coil. Passed
from public scene because of their indiscriminate use against blacks in several Southern
states in the mid-1960s. Example, electric baton or electric cattle prod [165].
Electrical, Homemade Body Armor. Newspapers
and magazines stuffed down inmates' clothing and/or the use of mattresses as shields to
counter the effects of stun guns [385].
Electrical, Police Jacket. Police jacket
which jolts anyone who touches it [165].
Electrical, Projector. An advanced version of
the standoff stun gun, where no wires are required. The charges are delivered through the
air through pre-ionized air channels or by charging a low energy projectile which releases
the charge at impact. Another approach is to launch a low energy projectile that releases
the electrical charge at impact by compressing a piezo-electric element [195:8].
Electrical, Stun Belt. A command activated
belt worn by prisoners which delivers a mild electric shock when they become combative
[385].
Electrical, Stun Gun-Close In.
A small, two-pronged, hand held electrical discharge weapon. Effective range is less than
an arm length. It works by affecting the muscle signal paths, disturbing the nerve system
[556].
Electrical, Stun Gun-Standoff. A form of stun
gun with a range of 20 feet. It fires small, barbed electrical contactors, via a fine
trailing wire, which snare a victim's clothing. A 3-4 second lapse takes place before the
target is subdued. The development of this device was inspired by the Watts Riots in 1965
[408,529].
Electrical, Water Stream. A mobile unit projects a water stream charged with high voltage, low amperage. Another
method cites 2 water jets, 1 negatively charged and 1 positively charged, which meet to
close the circuit [529].
I.
Electromagnetics
Electromagnetic, Engine Kill. The use of
high-powered microwaves to kill the electrical system of an engine.
Electromagnetic, High Power Microwave [HPM], Weapons.
Energy generated by a conventional electromagnetic apparatus, such as a radar transmitter,
or released from a conventional explosion converted into a radio-frequency weapon which
causes the disruption of electronic systems. Usually an ultra-wide ban source focus due to
target vulnerability considerations. HPMs can also cause human unconsciousness without
permanent maiming by upsetting the neural pathways in the brain and/or death [256,278].
Electromagnetic, Interference (EMI). Flight
control systems of military aircraft are sensitive to electromagnetic interference (EMI).
It is suspected that several crashes of Army UH-60 Black Hawk helicopters may have
resulted when they flew too near large microwave transmitters [278].
Electromagnetic, MASER. Microwave
Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation. A microwave generation device.
Electromagnetic Pulse, Non-Nuclear [NNEMP], Weapons.
Non-nuclear EMP generating weapons mounted on cruise missiles or unmanned aerial vehicles
(UAVs) which would disable enemy tanks and early warning radars would be invaluable. Such
weapons when they explode would produce a momentary burst of microwaves powerful enough to
disable all but special, radiation-hardened electronic devices [205,261,262].
Electromagnetic, Radio Frequency [RF], Weapons.
A class of weapons which transmit short, high-powered pulses of electromagnetic radiation
over significant ranges [278].
Electromagnetic, Rocket-Powered Unit. Unmanned
miniature-wheeled vehicle launched by a police cruiser which delivers an electromagnetic
energy pulse to the underside of a fleeing car's engine controls and associated sensors to
disable it [644:4].
Electromagnetic, Static Unit. See Electromagnetic,
Rocket-Powered Unit above. Static version resembling a pancake shaped bump in the
road. Remote control or unmanned automatic control [644:4].
Electromagnetic, Thermal Gun. A device that
directs energy to produce heat, in concept similar to a microwave oven [565].
J. Entanglers
Entangler, Animal "Come-Along." A
pole with a looped wire attached to one end. When the wire is placed around the neck of a
subject and then tightened it produces a choking effect much in the same manner as that of
a choking collar used for dogs.
Entangler, Bola. Device consisting of two or
three heavy balls attached by one or two ropes/cords and used for entanglement purposes.
It is twirled overhead in one hand and hurled or cast at the intended target. Designed to
entangle legs to retard/stop movement. Probably an ancient weapon, but made famous by the
gauchos of South America, who used them to catch cattle and ostrich.
Entangler, Cloggers. Polymer agents,
sticky-soft plastics, used in burst munitions to clog up jet and tank engine intakes
[144].
Entangler, Cloggers-Colored. Clogging agents
when mixed with dyes result in "tinted clouds" whose presence let friendly
forces know not to enter them [353].
Entangler, Cloggers-Colored, Mine-Air.
Cloggers mixed with colored gas which designate an air mine to allied pilots or drones.
These air mines can be intermixed with "decoy mines" consisting solely of
colored gas and laid in air mine fields to restrict aerial mobility [54].
Entangler, Monofilament Fishing Line. When
spread out on snow, monofilament fishing line may be sucked into a snowmobile's track
mechanism and cause it to jam. Effectiveness unconfirmed [15:108].
Entangler, Net-Electrified. A net shot from a
gun at a targeted individual. Will release an electric shock if the target tries to
struggle [361:69].
Entangler, Net, Gun. Fires a net which
entangles a human or vehicular target. One such net is 18 feet wide and employs
glue-coated strands. Another is 28-foot-wide, fired from a cannon and can envelope a car
or armored vehicle [121:24,165].
Entangler, Net, Mine-Human. Mine detonation
fires a net into the air which lands upon a soldier target.
Entangler, Net, Mine-Vehicular. A device laid
across a road which shoots a fabric barrier up about to 2 meters to ensnare an oncoming
vehicle [216].
Entangler, Net-Poles. A capture
device based on a pair of 6 foot nylon poles that have a strong chain interlaced between
them. It is employed by two people who capture the target in the chain mesh between the
poles [2:295,569:21].
Entangler, Riot Gloves. Heavy protective
gloves used by prison guards and riot police which protect the hands and forearms from
cuts and blunt trauma. These gloves allow for the grappling of prisoners and rioters.
K. Holograms
Hologram, Death. Hologram used to scare a
target individual to death. Example, a drug lord with a weak heart sees the ghost of his
dead rival appearing at his bedside and dies of fright [149:4].
Hologram, Prophet. The projection of the
image of an ancient god over an enemy capitol whose public communications have been seized
and used against it in a massive psychological operation [609].
Hologram, Soldiers-Forces. The projection of
soldier-force images which make an opponent think more allied forces exist than actually
do, make an opponent believe that allied forces are located in a region where none
actually exist, and/or provide false targets for his weapons to fire upon. New concept
developed in this document.
L. Markers
Marker, Foam Dye. Hand held device which is
used to spray green foaming dye into the face of an opponent. Obscures vision and marks
the target for one week for future identification.
Marker, Invisible. One concept envisions a
fluorescent powder sprayed into crowds from pressurized container. Particles adhere to
clothing and are only visible under ultraviolet light. Another concept envisions sponge
grenades impregnated with infrared dye so that rioters can be later identified [529].
Marker, Laser Paint. A laser dye and
scatterer suspended in a host medium. When irradiated with a laser beam, this "laser
paint" exhibits laser-like properties, becoming a brilliant light source, without
being a collimated beam [355].
Marker, Paint Gun. Gelatin capsule containing
a marking agent which splatters on impact leaving a 3" circle and streamers from
12" to 18" [2:294,529].
Marker, Smart Metals.
Metals formed with chemical additives or blended in a particular form so that they would
function only when used for legitimate purposes or give off telltales signs to inspectors
when used improperly [176:84].
Marker, Smoke Dyes. Marking dye added to
smoke during crowd control situations [529].
M. Obscurants
Obscurant, Agents. Rapid-hardening agents
used to obscure the vision ports/optics of an armored fighting vehicle [144].
Obscurant, Crazing. Higher
powered low energy laser weapons have the capability of heating and distorting or cracking
the glass lenses of optical systems. This effect is called crazing and is caused when the
heat buildup and subsequent cooling in the glass surface creates uneven stresses in the
glass surface to crack it. The result is a frosted effect, making it impossible to see
through the glass lenses or vision blocks (glass windows) in tanks. Such targets may be
effected at long ranges, and the optics can be crazed in less time than is needed to blink
an eye [1:148].
Obscurant, Laser-Argon Beam.
An Argon laser aimed at windows, automobile windshields or airplane canopies for vision
denial purposes. Microabrasions in the glass scatter this particular wavelength of light
turning the entire sheet a glaring, opaque green. As a result, a sniper could not see
through a window or a suicide driver would not be able to look out through the windshield
of the truck laden with explosives that he was driving [253].
Obscurant, Myopia. The inability of the human
eye to focus light from infinity accurately, which, in practical terms, means beyond
approximately 20 feet. If induced through nerve/chemical agents, performance degradation
could be dramatic, especially in aviation operations, because studies indicate that as
much as 85% of pilot sensory perception/ performance is through sight. Nerve gas can
induce myopia [14:42].
Obscurant, Smoke-Colored. Colored smoke
concentrations produce greater initial psychological and panic effect than white smoke.
Caucasians are said to have a greater repugnance to brilliant green smoke, which is
associated with disagreeable personal experiences such as seasickness, bile and vomit.
Negroids and Latins are declared to be most adversely affected by brilliant red. Rioters
confronted with a strong concentration of colored smoke feel, instinctively, that they are
being marked, or stained, and thus they lose anonymity [2:198-199].
Obscurant, Smoke-White. White obscuring smoke
delivered by grenades or smoke pots. Relatively inexpensive, non-toxic, noncontaminating
and tactically ideal for police use. Obscuring smokes are temporarily irritating to the
nose and throat, and cause those affected to lose visibility, sense of purpose and
direction [2:198,529].
N. Opticals
Optical, Add-On Combat Assault Weapon. The
use of a low energy laser weapon as a compliment to the main armament of a tank or
infantry fighting vehicle or as a compliment to a antitank missile system [1:172].
Optical, Bucha Effect. High
intensity strobe lights which flash at near human brain wave frequency causing vertigo,
disorientation, and vomiting [245]. See also Optical,
Stroboscopic Device.
Optical, Cameo Bluejay. A 75 pound version of
the AN/VLO-7 Stingray designed for use by the Apache attack helicopter [1:161].
Optical, C-CLAW. The Close-Combat Laser
Assault Weapon, code named "Roadrunner," was an early 1980s Army tactical laser
proto-type which was designed to attack the optics of opposing armored fighting vehicles.
The program was canceled in 1984 as a result of adverse publicity over human blinding
issues and cost/weight requirements [435].
Optical, Cobra. Prototype of the AN/PLQ-5
Laser Countermeasures System. A 30-pound hand-held laser weapon used to damage enemy
sensors and human eyes. Because this device may operate on three-different wave lengths it
may be impossible to be currently defended against [1:161-164].
Optical, Cornet Prince. Air Force version of
the AN/VLO-7 Stingray. It is a pod mounted system which is intended to protect an aircraft
from enemy air defense weapons which are dependent on optics and electro-optics for their
effect. Cornet Prince has a detection system which notifies an air crew if it is under
attack or if attack is imminent so that it can take the proper counter-measures [1:160].
Optical, Crazing. See Obscurant,
Crazing.
Optical, Dazer. Battery-operated 20,000
candlepower "flashlight." It uses an alexandrite laser and is meant to provide
infantry with a nonlethal capability against armored targets by attacking sensors, night
vision devices and personnel. The shoulder-fired Dazer weighs about 20 pounds and is
submachine gun size [1:161-163,16].
Optical, Dazzle. A class of optical weapons
that emit extremely bright light causing temporary blindness.
Optical, Dazzle Rifle. A rifle which emits an
eye-safe argon-ion laser beam designed to disorient the target [352].
Optical, Demons. Term for directed-energy
munitions [16].
Optical, Electro-Optical Countermeasures System.
AN/VLO-7, Stingray. A laser designed to blind the optics and electro-optics of
enemy tanks and armored fighting vehicles. Two test versions were deployed in the Gulf War
by the Army but not used. This device weighs about 160 kilograms. It can be mounted on
both the M1 Abrams tank and the Bradley infantry fighting vehicle [16,546]. See also Antilethal, Sensor-Retroreflectivity.
Optical, Flares. Both directional and
omnidirectional flares can be used against personnel and materiel to obscure vision.
Optical Flash. A 40-mm artillery shell filled
with plastic dye laser rods. Used to blind electro-optic sensors and enemy personnel
[114].
Optical, High Intensity Lights. High
intensity hydrogen-chloride light on a reflector equipped hand-held candle holder [529].
Optical, Illuminating-Grenade. In night
ambushes in Vietnam the MK1 Illuminating Grenade, which produced 55,000 candlepower for 25
seconds, effectively blinded Viet Cong caught in the center of its illumination zone for
short periods of time.
Optical, Isotropic Radiators. Special
munitions that illuminate or bloom with laser-bright intensity causing the same retinal or
optical damage as LEL (low energy laser) weapons. Isotropic radiation is generated by an
explosive burst that superheats a gaseous plasma surrounding it, causing a laser-bright
flash [246].
Optical, Laser. Light Amplification by
Stimulated Emission of Radiation.
Optical, Laser-Argon Beam. See Obscurant, Laser-Argon Beam.
Optical, Laser-Anti-Oil Storage Tank.
Man-portable laser system with a back-pack power supply designed for use against storage
tanks in the Gulf War. Use debated [16,577].
Optical, Laser Countermeasures System [LCMS].
AN/PLQ-5. M-16 rifle-mounted and backpack-powered 42 pound system. Can detect and disrupt
optical and electro-optical targeting systems at "stand-off ranges." While not
specifically intended to harm human eyes, the system was canceled so U.S. troops would not
be subjected to war crimes concerns [277,520].
Optical, Laser Dazzle System [LDS]. U.K.
Royal Navy's low energy laser system deployed during the 1982 Falklands war by two of its
frigates [475,476].
Optical, Laser-Infrared CO2.
Laser which can heat the skin of a target to cause pain but will not burn the skin.
Application against the hand of a suspect holding a knife or gun to a hostage [253].
Optical, Light Flashing Devices. Devices
which are much like a photographer's flash bulb but at a greatly increased power. They are
used to disorient target individuals by causing temporary flash blindness [23:206].
Optical, Low Energy Laser-Antilethal. See Antilethal, Low Energy Laser.
Optical, Low Energy Laser-Eye Safe. A
continuous wave laser, mounted on a M-16/M-203 rifle, that produces a high-intensity glare
strong enough to temporarily delay and disorient an adversary so that he can't complete a
mental task, like cutting a fence or walking on rough terrain. Effective range of several
hundred meters. Laser powered by 6 rechargeable AA size batteries [310:19].
Optical, Mobile Test Unit. Mid-1970s Army
tactical laser concept utilizing a medium powdered laser mounted on a Marine Corps armored
personnel carrier called the Mobile Test Unit. Used to shoot down some helicopter drones
[435].
Optical Munitions. A class of
non-lethal weapons which rely upon either a multi-directional or uni-directional intense
burst of light [isotropic radiator (laser)] generated by the high-explosive shock heating
of an inert gas [543].
Optical, Stroboscopic Device.
Devices employed against demonstrators which cause stroboscopic flashing. Same principle
as a discotheque "strobe." In the 5-15 hertz range these devices can cause
various physical symptoms and in a small portion of the population may trigger epileptic
seizures [23:206].
O. Projectiles
Projectile, Bag-Bean. Fabric sacks filled
with lead shot (usually No. 9) weighing from 40 to 150 grams, designed to be fired from 12
gauge shotguns and 37mm (40mm) launchers. The bags conform to the shape of the target on
impact, producing less damage than a solid hard projectile. The bags are rolled in the
cartridge and unroll after exiting the launch barrel. These projectiles are designed for
direct impact on the target, therefore accuracy is important to ensure effective impacts.
The level of energy delivered ranges from 40 to 100-foot pounds, depending on the distance
the projectile has to travel. Also known as Flying Bean Bag or Shot Bag.
Projectile, Bag-Bean-Rubberized, Gun. A
prison gun which utilizes rubberized bean bag projectiles. Used for movement of cell
blocks and surprise advances [385].
Projectile, Bag-Stun. Early form of nonlethal
projectile composed of a 5 1/4 ounce canvas pouch filled with metal buckshot which spread
into a 3-inch diameter pancake in flight. Known to cause serious injury [511:672].
Projectile, Bag-Stun, Launcher. An
obsolete gun which delivered a cartridge containing a 4" diameter stun-bag loaded
with 1/5 to 1/2 lb. of shot. It could be used as handgun or with an extension as a
shotgun. It has been replaced by the 12 gauge shotgun and the 37 (and 40) mm launchers
[529]. Also known as the stun gun.
Projectile, Ball-Rubber, Grenade. An
explosive anti-riot device which hurtles a large number of small "stinging" rubber balls at rioters when ignited. May or may not contain riot control agents [373]. Also known as stingball or stinger grenade.
Projectile, Ball-Rubber, Round. The common
usage of this term now refers to a number of 5/8 in. rubber balls fired from a 12 ga.
shotgun. The 3/8 in. ball is also common. Both have a hardness of about 50 shore. These
rounds have maximum effect when fired in confined spaces, where multiple bounces augment
the number of impacts on the target with sufficient force to sting rather than hurt. The
eyes are the most at risk of damage, due to the small size and velocity of the balls. The
older use of this term refers to a rubber ball fitted with a "Blake" attachment
to a shotgun. The ball can be solid or filled with liquid or gas. Various designs existed
for point or area targets [529].
Projectile, Barricade Penetrating. Any
projectile which delivers a riot control agent into a barricade situation via a window or
plate-glass. One such projectile is a fin stabilized injection-molded plastic device which
disperses a highly-volatile liquid CS agent [2:150,82].
Projectile, Baton-Plastic. A
PVC cylinder 1/2 inches in diameter and 4 inches long. Instead of being bounced off of the
ground these rounds are directly fired at the intended target. Causes a bruising impact
blow with a claimed effective range of 30 to 65 yards. At point blank range this round can
be fatal. First used by the British Army in Northern Ireland in February of 1973 as a
replacement for rubber bullets [2:159,511:672]. Also known as riot baton round, plastic
bullets or PVC bullets.
Projectile, Baton-Rubber.
Pliable rubber cylindrical projectiles delivered from the riot gun or British Army signal
gun. Aimed at crowd's legs or at the ground for ricochet effect into a crowd [165,529].
Also known as rubber baton or rubber bullet 6-inch.
Projectile, Baton-Wooden.
Wooden cylinder delivered by a riot gun or by a British Army signal gun [529]. Also known
as broomstick round.
Projectile, Baton-Wooden Multiple.
A 37-38mm round which disperses 5 wooden pellets which can be fired from a distance or
ricocheted into the mob. Direct fire at close or point blank range can cause serious or
fatal injuries [2:158].
Projectile, Baton-Wooden Whistling.
A short fluted cylinder made of wood and fired at low-velocity for crowd dispersal. This
round makes a whistling sound when fired. Whistling sound and visibility of round valued
over kinetic impact. Fired by a Hong Kong Pellet Gun [165].
Projectile, Chaff-Ceramic. Dropped or fired
in front of an aircraft which when ingested by a jet engine will destroy its turbine
blades and other mechanisms [356:35].
Projectile, Gas Vortex. If a gas vortex, a
highly stable phenomenon, was projected at some velocity, the difference in pressure on
the leading and trailing edges would produce an impact. Potential use in crowd and riot
control situations [556:19].
Projectile, Launcher-ARWEN. Anti-Riot Weapon
Enfield. A hand-held, cylinder fed, shoulder-launched 37mm anti-riot weapon which is used
to launch a variety of impact devices such as bean bags, pellets, rubber and wooden baton
rounds, etc.
Projectile, Launcher-Blake Impact Gun.
Aluminum alloy-type, golf ball sized projectile fitted to a bolt-action shotgun [529].
Projectile, Launcher-Velocity Adjusting.
Small arms weapon with an adjustable muzzle velocity intended for delivery of
less-than-lethal munitions such as rubber or PVC bullets. The purpose of the adjustment is
to tailor the velocity to the range [35].
Projectile, Launcher-Very Pistol. A 37mm
pistol used to fire tear gas and other nonlethal projectiles.
Projectile, Liquid Filled. Several types of
hollow rubber projectiles have been manufactured. The most recent, in a 12 ga. shotgun
size, is filled with a liquid dye to mark the target for subsequent identification, in
addition to the impact effect. The working range is from 5 to 75 feet. Older types
included a 3 inch diameter, .5 lb. rubber ball filled with water, to be used as an impact
projectile. The range was 75 ft. The launcher was large and heavy [529].
Projectile, Mine-Claymore. Modular Crowd
Control Munition. A nonlethal claymore-type mine which disperses blunt impact ordnance for
crowd control purposes [373].
Projectile, Muzzle Launch Ordnance [MLO]. MLO
MA/RA 88 less-than-lethal shot for the M16A2 Rifle. Must disorient targets at effective
ranges of 30-70 meters, not create shrapnel, and be of minimal hazard [338,373].
Projectile, Ricochet-Soft Plastic.
Polyethylene pellets 1/16" in diameter delivered from a standard 12-gauge shotgun
aimed to ricochet. Available in larger sizes [529].
Projectile, Ring Airfoil Grenade, Launcher.
Launcher Adapter, M234 Designed for attachment to M16A1 rifle. Uses blank cartridge (M755)
to propel either Soft Ring Airfoil Grenade (M742) or Sting Ring Airfoil Grenade (M743).
Projectile, Ring Airfoil
Grenade-Soft. Soft RAG, M742. A rubberized donut shape with airfoil
cross-section that is launched spinning from M234 adapter attached to M16A1 rifle. A
series of cavities in the projectile body contain packets of CS powder. Target impact
opens the CS packets and disseminates the chemical (powder). This system has been replaced
by the Non-Lethal 40mm Sponge Grenade.
Projectile, Ring Airfoil Grenade-Sting. Sting
RAG, M742. A rubberized donut shape with airfoil cross section that is launched spinning
from the M234 adapter attached to M16A1 rifle. Intended as an initial deterrent via
kinetic energy impact. Can also be used as a training round. This system has been replaced
by the Non-Lethal 40mm Sponge Grenade.
Projectile, Rock Salt. Large salt crystals
fired from shot guns. Crowd dispersal method.
Projectile, Rubber. These projectiles can be
solid (homogeneous) or clad (composite). Solid rubber projectiles can be further
classified by density, ranging from high density (hard), to soft (foam). The shape of the
homogeneous projectiles varies from a right cylinder (35mm diameter by 3 inches long) to a
cylinder with a hemispherical nose, to short cylinders (35mm diameter by 1 1/2 inches
long-multi-projectiles, soft foam) to hard, finned shape projectiles (12 gauge), and balls
about 5/8 inch. The large cylinders fired to strike the ground in front of the target
individuals, bouncing up to hit them. Depending on the distance from the ground impact to
the target, the impact point can range from the knees to the head, producing different
results. Past experience with this method of firing has shown that.
Projectile, Shards-Ceramic. Fired against
aircraft to disable their engines or to degrade their stealth capabilities [16].
Projectile, Splatt-Thixotropic. Special
Purpose Low Lethality Anti-Terrorist. Any projectile that deforms at impact, without
penetrating the body. One materiel preparation designed to accomplish this action is
described in the patent. The whole projectile is made of this substance, not just the tip.
The older usage of this term referred to any caliber shotgun shell with grease or soft
putty on the tip which would deform at impact [529].
Projectile, Sponge Grenade. 40mm
nonlethal projectile developed for the M203 grenade launcher made out of spongy material.
Can either be used as a kinetic weapon or with the inclusion of a CS or marking dye wafer.
Potentially fatal within 25 meters or if an eye shot occurs. Successor to the discontinued
Soft/Sting Airfoil Grenade System.
Projectile, Water Stream. Mobile unit which
projects a continuing stream of water for riot control purposes [529].
Projectile, Water Stream-Electrical. See Electrical, Water Stream.
P. Reactants
Reactant, Acetylene, Grenade. One pound bomb
containing calcium carbide and water. Upon detonation, forms a bubble of acetylene gas
seven feet in diameter. When sucked into the air intake of a diesel at concentrations as
little as one percent, the gas would cause the fuel in each cylinder to ignite
prematurely, with enough force to break piston rods [144,387].
Reactant, Chemical Compounds. Chemical
compounds which are magnitudes more powerful than hydrofluoric acid. A mixture of
hydrochloric acid (HCI) and nitric acid (H2NO3) will dissolve most
noble metals, such as gold and platinum, and organic compounds. Could be delivered by
binary weapons to attack structures, armored fighting vehicles, roads, roof tops and
optical systems [16,246,356]. Also known as supercaustics, superacids,
supercorrisive bases, C+, and tire eaters.
Reactant, Cloud Seeding.
Silver iodide dropped into clouds over the Ho Chi Minh trail during the Vietnam War in
order to promote additional rainfall which would degrade Viet Cong logistics [434]. See
also Reactant, Operation Popeye.
Reactant, Combustion Alteration. This technology consists of chemical additives that either contaminate or change the
viscosity characteristics of fuel to degrade standard engine performance. The additives
may be ingested as a vapor through air intakes, mixed with fuel during the intake cycle or
applied directly to a fuel source causing almost instant engine failure [302:13,16].
Reactant, Liquid Metal Embrittlement [LME].
Agents operate by altering the molecular structure of base metals or alloys and could
significantly interfere with the operation of the aircraft, vehicles, metal treads and
bridge supports to which they were applied. LMEs are clear and have little or no
perceptible residue, whether sprayed on or applied with felt-tip markers. Some ambiguity
exists because LMEs may refer to both liquids and liquid metals [16,302,356].
Reactant, LME Graffiti. Graffiti used to mask
an LME strike against a bridge or other target. Great potential for terrorist use.
Example, phone call to law enforcement stating that an LME strike has been conducted
against one of a number of bridges in a city using red LME graffiti.
Reactant, Operation
Popeye. The cloud-seeding campaign conducted by the U.S. military during the
Vietnam War. 2,602 Popeye flights were flown through 1972 in hopes of interdicting the
flow of Communists troops and supplies along the Ho Chi Minh Trail [434].
Reactant, Pyrophoric Particles. Particles
which when ingested in a combustion chamber give off heat and thus overheat the chamber
which causes thermal failure. Caesium would be one likely candidate [144,356]. Also known
as polystyrene peanuts.
Q. Riot Control
Agents
Riot Control Agent, Area Dispensers. RCA
dispensers mounted in the walls and ceilings of prison facilities. They provide law
enforcement personnel the ability to move groups out of or from one area to another
through CS and OC dispersement [385].
Riot Control Agent, CA. 4-Bromobenzylcyanide.
CA was one of the first tear agents used. It is not as effective as CN or CS and is
obsolete. CA produces a burning sensation of the mucous membranes and severe irritation
and tearing of the eyes with acute pain in the forehead [584:52]. Also known as BBC,
larmine, and camite.
Riot Control Agent, Chemical Mace. Small
spray can containing a 0.9 per cent solution of agent CN in a variety of petroleum based
carriers including a mixed freon/hydrocarbon solvent. First introduced in 1966. CS-Mace
then developed in 1968 by suggestion of the U.S. Army [2:213-214,165].
Riot Control Agent, CN. Chloroacetophenone. A lacrimator that causes irritation to the upper respiratory passages
and may cause irritations to the skin. On average, it incapacitates for approximately 3
minutes. Discovered by the German chemist Graeber in 1869. Replaced for most purposes by
CS [13:19,529].
Riot Control Agent, CR.
Dibenz-(b,f)-1,4-oxazepine. Newer riot control irritant developed in England in 1962 by
the British chemists Higginbottom and Suchitzsky. About 5 times more effective than CS. In
addition, CR is much less toxic than CS. CR is not used in its pure form (a yellow powder)
but dissolved in a solution of 80 parts of propylene glycol and 20 parts of water to form
a 0.1-percent CR solution. It is used in solution as a riot control agent. Eye pain,
discomfort and excessive tearing occur with sometimes painful sensitivity to strong light
or temporary blindness. Symptoms can persist for 15 to 30 minutes. Dubbed "fire
gas" by the media because of the burning sensation it caused to the skin of rioters
when used in Northern Ireland from 1973-1974. Authorized U.S. Army use in 1974
[2:180,67,584:59].
Riot Control Agent, CS.
Ortho-chlorobenzalmalononitrile was made the standard riot control agent by the Army in
1959. The term "CS" is derived from the two scientists, B.B. Carson and R.W.
Sloughton, who first prepared it in 1928. First used by U.S. civilian law
enforcement in 1968 during the riots in Washington D.C. While an effective riot control
agent, which incapacitates on average from 5 to 10 minutes, decontamination and
cross-contamination is a considerable problem in urban environments [13:19,82,337].
Riot Control Agent, CS1. Specially formulated
to prolong persistency and increase the effectiveness of CS. Unlike CS, CS1 is a
free-flowing (micropulverized) agent powder consisting of 95-percent crystalline CS
blended with 5-percent silica aerogel. This formulation reduces agglomeration and achieves
the desired respiratory effects when dispersed as a solid aerosol [584:59].
Riot Control Agent, CS2. CS blended with
silicone-treated silica aerogel, which causes it to repel water. This treatment improves
the physical characteristics of CS by reducing agglomeration and hydrolysis. This form of
CS prolongs the effectiveness for both immediate and surface contamination effects. When
disturbed, CS2 reaerosolizes to cause respiratory and eye effects. A cloud of waterproofed
CS can be kicked up by people walking in the street or grass two months after it has
settled [13:50,584:59].
Riot Control Agent, CSX. A form of CS
developed for dissemination as a liquid rather than as a powder. One gram of powdered CS
is dissolved in 99 grams of trioctylphosphite (TOF). As with CS, CSX stings and irritates
the eyes, skin, nose, throat, and lungs of exposed personnel [584:59].
Riot Control Agent, Disperser-Fogger.
Conventional insecticide blower adopted for CS and CN dispensing in Vietnam. Produces a
fog-type emission for up to a 15 minute period. Conceptual basis was to fill Viet Cong
tunnel complexes with large amounts of the CS agent. Another fogger was a handheld
gasoline-operated device which dispenses either CS, CN or inert fog at 0.7 gallon/hour
[2:178,165]. Also known as mighty mite (M-106) and pepper fogger.
Riot Control Agent, Disperser-Liquid. An Army
riot-control agent disperser visually resembling a man-carried flamethrower. Fully loaded
weight is approx. 55 pounds. Disperses CS mixed with a trioctylphosphate solvent.
[2:178,165]. Also known as liquid stream projector.
Riot Control Agent, Disperser-Powder.
Modified Dry-Powder Fire Extinguisher. Powdered CS and CN dispersal [165].
Riot Control Agent, Grenade Electrically Activated.
A riot control grenade with a male, electrically activated screw-in socket connection in
place of a standard fuse. This enables the grenades to be incorporated into electrical
systems, in fixed installations, where they can be activated by a trip device or switch,
at will. This is of special importance in security of buildings, and vital installations,
providing a dependable, economical protective system that can be locally installed. This
system, with variations, is now in use in commercial security systems, as well as in U.S.
government and embassy installations [2:133].
Riot Control Agent, Grenade-M73A. Army riot
control grenade in use prior to the M47-Type CS Grenade. As of 1992, the M7A3 was still in
use because of technical problems with the M47 [67].
Riot Control Agent, Grenade-M47 CS. Basic
riot control grenade employed by the Army. Its contents are expelled as a vapor from a
taped-over port in the grenade body, causing the grenade to "skitter" around on
the ground, making it difficult for rioters to throw back. As of 1992, it has not seen
tactical action [67].
Riot Control Agent, Homemade Face Filters.
Wet rags and other devices made by prison inmates to counter the effects of riot control
agents [385].
Riot Control Agent, Lacrimator. A riot
control irritant that will cause blinding tears upon contact with the eyes [444]. Also see Riot Control Agent, CN.
Riot Control Agent, Launcher-Handy Andy.
U.S. Army hand-hold type throwaway munition consisting of an aluminum tube with a
hand-activated striker in the base. On ignition, the E24 propels a cylindrical rubber
projectile containing 50 grams of CS burning formulation to distances of 70-100 yards
[2:179].
Riot Control Agent, Launcher-Riot Gun. A
weapon designed specifically to fire tear gas munitions of 37-mm diam. [444:2]. Also known
as 1 1/2-in gun, 38-mm gun, gas gun, and tear gas launcher.
Riot Control Agent, Mine. An anti-personnel
mine filled with a riot control agent. For perimeter use around detention camps or secured
facilities.
Riot Control Agent, OC. Oleoresin Capsicum. A
food product obtained from chili peppers which are dried and ground into a fine powder.
When mixed with an emulsifier such as mineral, vegetable, soy oil or water, it may be
sprayed from a variety of dispensers and used as an irritant for safely controlling
violent persons or vicious animals and/or restoration and maintenance of order.
Riot Control Agent, Ring Airfoil Grenade-Soft.
See Projectile, Ring Airfoil Grenade-Soft.
Riot Control Agent, Sponge Grenade. See Projectile, Sponge Grenade.
Riot Control Agent, Tear Gas-Invisible.
Invisible tear-gas clouds are produced by blast munitions loaded with dust or liquid
agents. Invisible tear gas cannot be seen by rioters once it first emerges from a grenade
or mechanical dispenser and therefore produces a greater psychological panic-producing
effect than tear smoke [2:161-162].
Riot Control Agent, Tear Gas-Visible. Visible
tear-gas clouds (tear smoke) emanate from burning grenades and projectiles. Tear smoke is
highly visible and plainly indicates the area covered to police and rioter alike
[2:161-162].
II. Nonlethal Weapons Concepts
A. Ethical
Ethical, Biological Weapons Convention
[BWC], 1972. This convention prohibits the development, production,
stockpiling or retention of microbial or biological agents for use as weapons. Would
likely preclude the use of biodegrading microbes [16,508].
Ethical, Blinding Laser Ban, 1995.
The Department of Defense prohibits the use of lasers specifically designed to cause
permanent blindness of unenhanced vision and supports negotiations prohibiting the use of
such weapons. However, laser systems are absolutely vital to our modern military. Among
other things, they are currently used for detection, targeting, range-finding,
communications and target destruction...accidental or incidental eye injuries may occur on
the battlefield as the result of the use of legitimate laser systems. This prohibition was
initiated by the United States in concurrence with other, mostly Western, nations [457].
Ethical, Certain Conventional Weapons
Convention, 1980. Prohibits or restricts weapons which are deemed to be
excessively injurious or to have indiscriminate effects. Microwave, radio-frequency
radiation, and visible light pulsing at brain-wave frequency may violate this convention
[20:49-54,508:45]. Also known as Inhumane Weapons Convention.
Ethical, Chemical Weapons Convention [CWC], 1993.
This convention, while not in force, precludes the use of toxic chemicals as a method of
warfare. A toxic chemical is one which 'though its chemical action on life processes can
cause death, temporary incapacitation or permanent harm to humans or animals.' How
supercaustics would be interpreted within this convention is unknown [16,508].
Ethical, Environmental Modification Techniques Ban, 1977. Found in Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other
Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques (ENMOD). Bans any technique for
changing- through deliberate manipulation of natural processes- the dynamics, composition
or structure of the Earth, including its biota, lithosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere,
or of outer space which will have widespread, long-lasting or severe effects as the means
of destruction, damage or injury to any other State Party [20:68-69].
Ethical, Geneva Protocol, 1925. Whereas the
use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of analogous liquids, materials
or devices, has been justly condemned by the general opinion of the civilized world; and
Whereas the prohibition of such use has been declared in Treaties to which the majority of
Powers of the world are Parties; and To the end that this prohibition shall be universally
accepted as part of International Law, binding alike the conscience and the practice of
nations. Extended to bacteriological methods of warfare. The United States has interpreted
the Protocol of 1925 as not prohibiting the use of riot control agents [20:57-58].
Ethical, New Martyrdom. A potential
form of martyrdom arising from the long-term incapacitation capacity that some nonlethal
weapons provide. Examples are permanently blinding or disrupting the nervous systems of
opposing soldiers. Those living, rather than dead, would represent a new form of martyr. References to the horrors of the gassings of the First World
War would undoubtedly be made [149:10-11].
Ethical, Tennessee vs. Garner. A 1985 court
case (475 U.S. 1) which held that the use of deadly force to apprehend an apparently
unarmed, nonviolent fleeing felon is unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment.
Stimulated law enforcement interest in less-than-lethal weapons.
B. Functional
Functional, Bouchon. The
complete metal fuze assembly of a diversionary device or similar grenade, usually
consisting of a safety pin, safety "spoon," and a percussion type ignition
device.
Functional, Deflagrate. To burn; consume; to
burn rapidly with intense heat and dazzling light.
Functional, Deflagrating Canister. A canister
which is designed to burst or burn. When used with a diversionary device, this type of
canister is designed to burst or burn at a low enough pressure to prevent the bouchon from
being thrown.
Functional, Deflagrating Explosive. Any
explosive which deflagrates rather than detonates. Also called a "low" explosive, it is characterized by relatively slow burning processes with progressive
reaction rates and buildup of pressure which creates a heaving action.
Functional, Deployment Sequence. The first of
three functions when a diversionary device is deployed. It refers to the manner and place
in which a diversionary device is deployed. See also Functional, Ignition Sequence and Functional, Firing Sequence.
Functional, Detonate. To explode violently
and noisily; also called a "high" explosive it is characterized by very rapid
chemical reactions, thus causing tremendously high pressure and brisance (shattering
action).
Functional, Detonating Explosive. Any
explosive which detonates rather than deflagrates. Also called a "high" explosive, it is characterized by very rapid chemical reactions, thus causing tremendously
high pressure and brisance (shattering action).
Functional, Firing Sequence. The second of
three functions when a diversionary device is deployed. It refers to the mechanical action
of the bouchon, (fuze assembly). See also Functional, Deployment Sequence and Functional, Ignition Sequence.
Functional, Fuse. A narrow tube filled with
combustible material, or a wick saturated with such material, for setting off an explosive
charge. A pyrotechnic device which serves as the initiator to an explosive charge (e.g.
M-3A1, friction type fuse).
Functional, Fuze. Any of various
devices for detonating bombs, projectiles, or explosive charges. A mechanical device used
as the initiator to an explosive charge (e.g. M-201A1, percussion type fuze).
Functional, Hybrids. Weapons that can be
switched from "lethal" to "nonlethal" by a simple mechanism, having
multiple barrels, or using ammunition which can be switched at launch (single barrel,
lightened logistic chain) [529].
Functional, Ignition. Setting a thing on
fire, to cause something to burn.
Functional, Ignition Sequence. The
third of three functions when a diversionary device is deployed. It refers to the events
which take place during the burning of the charge. See also Functional, Deployment
Sequence and Functional, Firing Sequence.
C. Operational
Operational, Brevity Code. A one or two word
phrase which, when transmitted on a radio, carries a much larger meaning. Used to keep
transmission time to a minimum without unduly tying up valuable "air time." Usually repeated twice to ensure understanding.
Operational, Denial System. Components of a
security system that prevent an intruder or adversary from completing an intrusive hostile
act on a fixed sight [359].
Operational, Dirty Battlefield. A battlefield
operational environment in which civilians and other noncombatants are mixed in with
combatants [56].
Operational, Environmental Warfare. A form of
attack based on purposeful environmental degradation by a state or non-state group against
an opponent. An early example would be the salting of the fields of Carthage by the
Romans. The most recent example would be the blowing up of 732 oil wells in Kuwait and the
releasing of oil into the Persian Gulf by Iraq in 1991.
Operational, Immediate Action Drill. Any
action, technique or procedure which is initiated by an event rather than a signal [5].
Operational, Lethal-Nonlethal Coordination. A
process by which hardkill and softkill weapons are made to enhance the effects of one
another rather than degrade each others' performance. Applied to the defensive systems of
a warship [570].
Operational, Long Term Disablement. The
outcome of the application of nonlethal force that affects the opponent beyond duration of
the confrontation or conflict. Blinding, maiming or psychologically deranging the opponent
represent forms of long term disablement. This form of disablement burdens a society and
is anathema to the Western definition of nonlethality.
Operational, Mobile Security System.
Area/fixed site denial or delay systems that are portable, leveraging on nonlethal
technology and minimal installation costs [402].
Operational, Mobile Tactics. A procedure used
against rioters in which an anti-riot team is embarked on vehicles, rapidly driven near
rioters, whereupon they quickly disembark and rush toward the crowd, followed by another
team which repeats the procedure and exploits the momentum gained by the original team.
Operational, Nonlethal-Lethal Effect. A
nonlethal attack which purposefully sets up an opposing soldier or vehicle for a fatal
attack. Example, a soldier struck to the ground by a stick'em' and then shot by a
conventional round or killed by an artillery barrage.
Operational, Nonlethal Weapons, Non-Western.
Weapons which are designed to cause long-term disablement to military personnel and
civilians. These weapons may be employed by either non-state forces or non-Western
nation-states. Forms of nonlethal non-Western weapons include blinding lasers, disease
organisms, and genetic alteration [149:3].
Operational, Nonlethal Weapons, Western.
Weapons that are explicitly designed and primarily employed so as to incapacitate
personnel or materiel, while minimizing fatalities, permanent injury to personnel, and
undesired damage to property and the environment. Unlike conventional lethal weapons that
destroy their targets principally through blast, penetration and fragmentation, non-lethal
weapons employ means other than gross physical destruction to prevent the target from
functioning. Non-lethal weapons are intended to have one, or both, of the following
characteristics: a. they have relatively reversible effects on personnel or materiel, b.
they affect objects differently within their area of influence [229:1-2].
Operational, Passive Deterrents. A genre of
nonlethal weapons that does not affect the physiology of the target individual. Includes
dyes, personal alarms, and scent sprays.
Operational, Rules of Engagement [ROEs]. Generally,
rules that provide implementation guidance on actions to exercise 1. the inherent right
and obligation of self-defense and 2. the application of force for mission accomplishment
by national/multinational military forces in international not domestic situations. The
many boundaries to ROE's include international laws and treaties, national policy and
custom. Standing Rules of Engagement refer to those generally intended for all situations,
but tailored ROE's for specific situations may augment those standing rules. This is a
general, not legal, description.
Operational, Second Order Effect. A
nonlethal attack ultimately resulting in an unintentional death. For example, a pilot,
blinded by a laser unable to safely land his or her aircraft or a patient dies because the
power to an incubator or iron long in a hospital is cut off due to the destruction of a
power plant.
Operational, Short Term Disablement. A
form of disablement which has relatively reversible effects on personnel or materiel [230:1].
Operational, Tailored Weaponry. Alternative,
and likely more accurate, term for nonlethal weaponry. Such weaponry is qualitatively
advanced over traditional firearms and munitions because it allows for precision control
over the application of politico-military force. Rather than killing (100% force) or
not-killing (0% force) an opponent these weapons offer new capabilities in the 1-99% range
between no action and lethal force.
D. Physiological
Physiological, Acetylcholine Effect. The
temporary effect an organism experiences after long periods of high stress, characterized
by a total emotional surrender. Derived from an overabundance of the compound
acetylcholine which is active in the transmission of nerve impulses.
Physiological, Diversion. A diversion which
acts directly on a person by affecting one or more of the five senses.
Physiological, Impulse Noise. Noise which
lasts less than one second.
Physiological, Lag Time. The physiological
time lag which occurs between the time a stimulus is perceived until the body responds. In
a healthy, well-rested human, this takes about three-quarters of a second.
Physiological, Rhodopsin. A
purplish protein pigment, contained in the rods of the retina, that is transformed by the
action of light and is necessary for vision in dim light.
Physiological, Sensory Overload.
A temporary inability of an organism to correctly interpret and appropriately respond to
life's stimuli because of the volume of input.
Physiological, Ulster Techniques. Psychophysiological
techniques employed by the British in Northern Ireland based on sensory deprivation which
can lead to long-lasting post-traumatic neurosis. Methods used included hooding, masking
noise, wall standing, inadequate diet, sleep deprivation and some physical brutality
[532].
E. Theoretical
Theoretical, Environmental Security. The
recognition that the natural environment in which humans exist must be protected for their
continued benefit. Because of the magnitude of many environmental problems, they require
regional not national level solutions.
Theoretical, Fourth Epoch War. Strategic
level theory of war utilizing an energy paradigm of Western civilization. The magnitude of
change forecast is equivalent in scale to the Dark Ages, 378-732, and the European
Renaissance, 1346-1648. During these transformations a new energy source is demonstrated
on the battlefield, the dominant polity form "fails," the non-state soldier
achieves dominance on the battlefield, crime and war blur, a new economy emerges, social
classes shift, and advanced forms of battlespace and weaponry develop [633:23-25].
Theoretical, Fourth Generation Warfare.
Operational level theory of warfare which views military change based upon advances in
either technology or ideas. The emerging "idea based" fourth generation is
thought to be based on terrorism and low intensity conflict [633:19-21].
Theoretical, MTR. A military technical
revolution was declared by the Soviets to be taking place back in the 1980s. This
revolution is based on emerging technologies, electronic and information systems and
non-nuclear deep strike munitions, and will qualitatively alter the conduct of future war.
The MTR is the conceptual forerunner to the revolution in military affairs (RMA) [640:2].
See also Theoretical, RMA.
Theoretical, New Gunpowder Revolution. The
perception that the wide scale application of nonlethal technology on the battlefield will
be as significant as the fielding of gunpowder based firearms during the European
Renaissance [149:9].
Theoretical, Nonlethality. The theory that
overwhelming nonlethal force could be used to defeat lethal force [418:24].
Theoretical, Post-Engine, Mechanical, Energy.
For more advanced forms of nonlethal weaponry such as lasers and acoustics to properly
function post-engine (mechanical) forms of energy will be required [149:7]. See also Theoretical, Fourth Epoch War.
Theoretical, RMA. Revolution in Military
Affairs. Operational level theory which views military technical, doctrinal, and force
structure changes now taking place equivalent in magnitude to the 1920's and 1930's when
armored warfare, strategic bombing, and amphibious and carrier operations developed. The
RMA is generally accepted by the U.S. Armed Forces and Office of Net Assessment [640].
Theoretical, RPMA. Fourth Epoch War theory
perception that a revolution in political and military affairs (RPMA) is taking place. Far
larger than a revolution in military affairs (RMA), this historical transition will result
in the eventual demise of the nation-state, the blurring of crime and war, and the rise of
new competing polity forms [633]. See also Theoretical, Fourth Epoch War.
Theoretical, Sixth Generation Warfare. Soviet
(Russian) view of future warfare based upon faulty historical modeling which does not
differentiate between strategic and operational level change. The current military
revolution is said to be equivalent in magnitude to the 1920s & 1930s or the 1950s
& 1960s. Attributes of the new form of warfare developing will include the ascendancy
of aerospace operations, the growing importance of electronic warfare and the
computerization of armed combat [634]. See also Theoretical, MTR.
Theoretical, Third Wave War. Theory of future
war modeled on "waves" of economic based civilizations. First wave civilizations
are agricultural, second wave civilizations are industrial and emerging third wave
civilizations are informational. Future warfare will be informational based with the Gulf
War representing the first of these conflicts. Magnitude of current change now taking
place viewed as equivalent to that of the Industrial Revolution [633:21-23].
Theoretical, Twenty-First Century Politico-Military
Force Matrix. Nonlethal technology, when coupled with traditional forms of lethal
weaponry, allow for the application of short-term incapacitation, long-term
incapacitation, and deadly force against the physical and mental/perceptual attributes of
human targets and the hardware and software attributes of machine targets. This advanced
form of politico-military force application can be expressed in a matrix [149:4].
Theoretical, War, Clausewitzian.
A struggle between nation-states or their coalitions over the preservation and extension
of national sovereignty.
Theoretical, War, Post-Clausewitzian. A
struggle between competing forms of social and political organization over which the
eventual successor to the nation-state will be built [633:27].
Theoretical, Weapons of Mass Protection.
Nonlethal, antilethal, and information warfare weapons [418:16].
REFERENCE LISTING
I. Books
| [1] |
Anderberg, MajGen. Bengt & Wolbarsht, Dr. Myron
L. (1992). Laser Weapons: The Dawn of a New Military Age. New York, New York:
Plenum Press. |
| [2] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1981). Riot Control: Materiel and
Techniques. 2nd Edition. Boulder, Colorado: Paladin Press. (1st Edition. Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania: Stackpole Books, 1969). |
| [3] |
Clede, Bill. (1987). Police Nonlethal Force Manual:
Your Choices This Side of Deadly Force. Harrisburg, Pennsylvania: Stackpole Books. |
| [4] |
Doswald-Beck, Louise., ed. (1993). Blinding Weapons:
Reports of the Meetings of Experts Convened by the International Committee of the Red
Cross on Battlefield Laser Weapons 1989-1991. Geneva, Switzerland: International
Committee of the Red Cross. |
| [5] |
Heal, Charles "Sid." (1991). The Diversionary
Device Reference Manual. Doylestown, Pennsylvania: National Tactical Officer's
Association. |
| [6] |
Manual of Tear Gas Information.(1967).
Alternative title Training Officer's Tear Gas
Blue Book. Saltsburg, Pennsylvania: Federal Laboratories. |
| [7] |
McLaughlin, Vance. (1992). Police and the Use of Force:
The Savannah Study. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger. |
| [8] |
Momboisse, Ramond M. (1970). Riots, Revolutions and
Insurrections. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas Publisher. |
| [9] |
Momboisse, Ramond M. (1969). Confrontations, Riots,
Urban Warfare. MSM Enterprises. |
| [10] |
Jones, Eugene S. (1970). Law Enforcement Chemical
Agents and Related Equipment. Santa Cruz, California: Davis Publishing, Co. |
| [11] |
Swearengen, Thomas F. (1966). Tear Gas Munitions: An
Analysis of Commercial Riot Gas Guns, Tear Gas Projectors, Grenades, Small Arms
Ammunition, and Related Tear Gas Devices. Springfield, Illinois: C.C. Thomas. |
| [12] |
United States Marine Corps. (1940). Small Wars. 1st
Printing. Manhattan, Kansas: Sunflower Press. (2nd Printing, 1996). |
| [13] |
Verwey, Wil D. (1977). Riot Control Agents and
Herbicides in War: Their Humanitarian, Toxicological, Ecological, Military, Polemological,
and Legal Aspects. Leyden: A.W. Sijthoff. |
II. Chapters
| [14] |
Cook, Dr. David L. (1992). Refractive Error. Vision,
What Every Pilot Needs to Know. Atlanta, Georgia: Invision Press, 42. |
| [15] |
Foreman, Dave & Haywood, Bill., eds. (1987). Roads and
Tires, Vehicles and Heavy Equipment. EcoDefense: A Field Guide to Monkeywrenching.
Tucson, Arizona: Ned Ludd Books, 89-156. |
| [16] |
Kokoski, Richard. (1994). Non-lethal weapons: a case study
of new technology developments. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). SIPRI
Yearbook 1994. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 367-386. |
| [17] |
O'Connor, Paul G. (1994, Aug.). Waging Wars with Nonlethal
Weapons. Magyar, Dr. Karl P., ed. Challenge and Response: Anticipating US Military
Security Concerns. Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama: Air University Press., 333-344. |
| [18] |
Powell, William. (1971). Natural, Nonlethal, and Lethal
Weapons. The Anarchist Cookbook. Secaucus, New Jersey: Barricade Books, Inc.,
77-110. |
| [19] |
Reaves, Brian A. & Smith, Pheny Z. (1993). Table 15a.
Types of nonlethal weapons authorized for use by officers in local law enforcement
agencies, 1993. Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics, 1993: Data
for Individual State and Local Agencies with 100 or More Officers. Washington,
District of Columbia: U.S. Department of Justice, 169-180. |
| [20] |
Reisman, W. Michael & Antoniou, Chris T., eds. (1994).
Using Force (selected protocols and conventions). The Laws of War: A Comprehensive
Collection of Primary Documents on International Laws Governing Armed Conflict. New
York, New York: Random House |
| [21] |
Sapolsky, Harvey M. (1994). War without Killing.
Sarkesian, S. & Flanagin, J., eds. U.S. Domestic and National Security Agendas.
Contributions in Military Studies, Vol. 152. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.,
27-40. |
| [22] |
Summers, Harry G. (1985). Operation Ranch Hand. Vietnam
War Almanac. New York, New York; Facts on File Publications, 66-67 |
| [23] |
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).
(1978). Non-penetrating kinetic energy projectiles & Electric, acoustic and
electromagnetic-wave weapons. Anti-personnel Weapons. London, England: Taylor & Francis Ltd., 108-110, 202-210. |
| [24] |
Toffler, Alvin & Heidi. (1993). War Without Blood? War
and Anti-War: Survival at the Dawn of the 21st Century. Boston, Massachusetts: Little,
Brown and Company, 125-136. |
III. Documents
| [25] |
AAI Corp. (1979). Incapacitating Agent
Weapons Technology. Baltimore, Maryland. |
| [26] |
Adams, J.P. (1966, Apr.). Teargas injuries; a
clinical study of hand injuries and an experimental study on its effects on peripheral
nerves and skeletal muscles in rabbits. The Journal of Bone Surgery, 48. |
| [27] |
Adams Schmidt, Dana. (1971, 11 Jan.).
Pentagon says defoliation may help South Vietnamese economy. The New York Times. |
| [28] |
Aerospace Daily. (1995, 28 Jul.). Lack
of DOD requirements prevents non-lethal technology growth, 141. |
| [29] |
Aerospace Daily. (1995, 28 Jul.). SASC
provides $37.2 million for new non-lethal weapons office, 141. |
| [30] |
Aerospace Daily. (1993, 12 Aug.).
Regarding Non-Lethal Weapons, 245. |
| [31] |
Aerospace Daily. (1992, 6 Mar.).
Pentagon Eyes Minimum-Lethality Weapons, 377. |
| [32] |
Aftergood, Steven. (1994, Sep.-Oct.). The
Soft-Kill Fallacy: The Idea of Non-Lethal Weapons is Politically Attractive and
Purposefully Misleading. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 50, (5)
40-45 |
| [33] |
Agence France-Presse. (1995, 24 Feb.).
Goo, suds and bean bags: new additions to US arsenal in Somalia, Internet. |
| [34] |
Air Force Times. (1995, 17 Jul.).
Waves of Goo, 55, (50) 32. |
| [35] |
Air Force Times (1994, 11 Apr.).
Crimebusters! |
| [36] |
Alexander, John B. (1996, Jun.). Shoot, But
Not to Kill. International Defense Review, 29, (6) 77-78. |
| [37] |
Alexander, Dr. John B. (1996, Mar.).
Non-Lethal Weapons Demand Expands as Missions Change. National Defense, 80,
(516) 34-35. |
| [38] |
Alexander, John B. (1995, 9 Mar.). Non-lethal
Weapons and the Future of War. LA-UR 95-699. Invited presentation to the Harvard-MIT
Seminar on the Future of War. John M. Olin Institute for Strategic Studies, Harvard
University Center for International Affairs |
| [39] |
Alexander, John B. (1994, 2 Nov.). Nonlethal
Weapons: Concepts, Applications, & Issues. LA-UR 94-3580. Presented to the Bourn's
College of Engineering, University of California, Riverside. |
| [40] |
Alexander, John B. (1994, 27 Sep.). Nonlethal
Antimateriel Application of Superacids and Other Very Aggressive Chemical Agents.
LA-CP 94-203. Presented to NATO Advisory Group on Aerospace Research and Development,
Rome, Italy. |
| [41] |
Alexander, John B. (1994, 23 Aug.). A
Proposal for Non-Lethal Force Development. LA-CP 94-190. Presented to Defense Science
Board, University of California, Irvine. |
| [42] |
Alexander, John B. (1994, Jul.). Deeskalation
und der Bedarf von Schonenden Waffen (Deescalation and the Need for Nonlethal Weapons)
with Dipl Ing Ulrich Rieger. LA-UR 94-2205. Published in German by Deutsche Aerospace. |
| [43] |
Alexander, John B. (1994, May.). Nonlethal
Weapons: A Need for New Options. LA-UR 94-1497. Presented at the International
Symposium for Common Defense 1994 "Keeping the Peace," Arlington, Virginia. |
| [44] |
Alexander, John B. (1994, 28 Mar.). Nonlethal
Weapons as Force Options for the Army. LA-UR 94-861. Presented to the National
Research Council, Board on Army Science and Technology, National Academy of Science. |
| [45] |
Alexander, John B. (1994, 24 Jan.). Nonlethal
Defense Briefing. LA-UR 94-72. Presented to NATO AGARD, Paris, France. |
| [46] |
Alexander, John B. (1993, 27 Oct.). Nonlethal
Weapons and Limited Force Options. LA-UR 93-3747. Presented to the Council on Foreign
Relations, New York, New York. |
| [47] |
Alexander, John B. (1993, 2 Jun.). Nonlethal
Weapons Technology. Proceedings of the MIT Conference on the Political Implications of
Non-Lethal Warfare Technologies. Lexington, Massachusetts. |
| [48] |
Alexander, John B. (1993, 7 Mar.). New
Weapons for a New World Order: The Pentagon looks to nonlethal technology. The Boston
Globe, 70. |
| [49] |
Alexander, John B. (1992, 13 Nov.). Rethinking
National Security Requirements & the Need for Nonlethal Weapons Options. LA-UR
92-3773. Submitted to President-Elect Clinton's Transition Team. |
| [50] |
Alexander, John B. (1992, 29 Sep.). Potential
Non-Lethal Policy Issues. LA-UR 92-3206. Submitted to the Wall Street Journal. |
| [51] |
Alexander, John B. et al. (1992, May). Antimateriel
Technology. LA-12319-PR Laboratory-Directed Research and Development. |
| [52] |
Alexander, John B. & Gates, Robert.
(1991, Sep.). Contingency Mission Technology. LA-UR 91-3161. |
| [53] |
Alexander, John B. (1990, Sep.). Future Applications of
Directed Energy Weapons in Non-Lethal Defense. LA-CP 90-393. |
| [54] |
Alexander, US Army Ret. Col. John B. (1989, Oct.).
Antimateriel Technology. Military Review, 69, (10) 29-41. |
| [55] |
Alexander, Lexi & Klare, Julia L. (1995-1996, Win.).
Nonlethal Weapons: New Tools for Peace. Issues in Science and Technology, 12, (2) 67-74. |
| [56] |
American Defense Preparedness Association. (1996, 6-7
Mar.). Non-Lethal Defense II Conference: Proceedings & Updated Attendee Roster.
Alexander, John B., chair. The Ritz-Carlton Hotel, Tysons Corner, McLean, Virginia. |
| [57] |
Americans for Effective Law Enforcement. (1988). Use-of
Force Tactics and Non-Lethal Weaponry. Alert Issue, (3) 2-6. |
| [58] |
Amnesty International, National Office. (1988). Israel and
the Occupied Territories: the misuse of tear gas by Israeli army personnel in the Israeli
Occupied Territories. New York, New York. |
| [59] |
Amouyal, Barbara. (1990, 19 Nov.). Use of Nonlethal
Weapons May Alter Military Strategy. Defense News, 5, 7. |
| [60] |
Amouyal, Barbara & Munro, Neil. (1990, 5 Nov.). Labs
Rush Nonlethal Arms for Mideast Deployment. Defense News, 10, 1. |
| [61] |
Anderberg, Bengt, Bring, Ove E. & Wolbarsht, Myron L.
(1992, Aug.). Blinding Laser Weapons and International Humanitarian Law. Journal of Peace
Research, 29, (3) 287-297. |
| [62] |
Anderberg, Bengt & Wolbarsht, Myron L. (1992, May).
Hand-Held Laser Weapons are Waiting in the Wings. Armed Forces Journal International, 129,
(10) 60. |
| [63] |
Anderson, Col. Gary W. (1996, Jul.). There's A Better Way:
Tomorrow's Missions Cry Out For A Mix of Lethal and Non-Lethal Weapons. Armed Forces
Journal International, 133, (12) 15. |
| [64] |
Anderson, S.E. (1971, Jan.). CS and its use. The Military
Review. |
| [65] |
Anderson, Jon R. (1995, 8 May.). Fighting with new
purpose: Marines' new 'experimental' unit looks at future wars. Navy Times, 30. Marine
Corps Edition. |
| [66] |
Andrews, Andy E. & Alexander, John B. (1993, Oct.).
Softer Response Required as Global Threats Change. National Defense, 78, (491) 23-24. |
| [67] |
Applegate, Rex. (1992, Dec.). Riot Control: Army and
National Guard Unprepared to Rule the Mob. Soldier of Fortune, 43-47, 71. |
| [68] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1978, Feb.). New U.S. Army Riot
Control Developments. Law & Order, 56-57, 62. |
| [69] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1974, Jul.). Guns & the Law:
Multipurpose Police Handgun Developments, Non-Lethal Police Weaponry May be the Most
Significant Development in the History of Law Enforcement. Guns, 28. |
| [70] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1973, Jun.). Guns & the Law: New
Ideas for Law Enforcement Part 2. Guns, 24. |
| [71] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1972, Sep.). Guns & the Law:
Non-Lethal Weapons and the Law. Guns, 30. |
| [72] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1971, Dec.). Guns & the Law:
Non-Lethal Weapons, Part IV. Guns, 34. |
| [73] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1971, Aug.). Guns & the Law:
Non-Lethal Weapons, Part III. Guns, 26. |
| [74] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1971, Jul.-Aug.). Nonlethal Police
Weapons. Ordnance, 56, (307) 62-66. |
| [75] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1971, Jul.). Guns & the Law:
Non-Lethal Weapons, Part II. Guns, 28. |
| [76] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1971, Jun.). Guns & the Law:
Non-Lethal Weaponry. Guns, 32. |
| [77] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1970, Sep.). Guns & the Law:
Pepper Fogger. Guns, 30. |
| [78] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1970, Aug.). The Ferret Barricade
Round, A 12 Gauge Riot Shotgun Projectile that Requires No Attachment. Law & Order,
112. |
| [79] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1970, Apr.). Guns & the Law:
Tear Gas Grenades. Guns, 26. |
| [80] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1970, Feb.). Guns & the Law:
Ferret Barricade Round. Guns, 28. |
| [81] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1969, Nov.). New Weaponry for Riot
Control. The National Guardsman, 10. |
| [82] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1969, Sep.-Oct.). Riot Control 1969.
Ordnance, 54, 180-184. |
| [83] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1968, Oct.). Mace Revisited. Law & Order, 50. |
| [84] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1968, May.). Super Sonic Sound- A
New Police Weapon. Law & Order, 28. |
| [85] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1967, Aug.). Guns & the Law: The
Long Riot Baton. Guns, 28. |
| [86] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1967, Jun.). Guns & the Law: New
Weapon Against Crime. Guns, 28. |
| [87] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1967, May.-Jun.). Weapons for Riot
Control. Ordnance, 51, 604. |
| [88] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1966, Jun.). The Chemical Mace,
Evaluation of a New Police Weapon for Mob Control or Individual Defense. Law & Order. |
| [89] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1966, May.-Jun.). The Chemical Mace.
The National Sheriff, 8. |
| [90] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1965, Sep.-Oct.). "Soft
Soaping" The Rioters. The National Sheriff, 4. |
| [91] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1965, Sep.). Bubbles & Banana
Peels, A New "Soft" Weapon for Destroying Dignity. Law & Order, 22. |
| [92] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1965, Mar.). The New Multi-Purpose
Riot Control Grenade. Law & Order, 53. |
| [93] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1964, Jul.-Aug.). New Riot Control
Weapons. Ordnance, 67. |
| [94] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1964, Jul.). A Commentary on Riot
Control Chemical Tear Gas.CN and CS. Law & Order, 41. |
| [95] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1964, Mar.) The Long Riot Baton. Law & Order, 36. |
| [96] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1963, Oct.). Smoke vs. the Mob
Cancer. The Police Chief. |
| [97] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1963, Oct.). A New Police
Shock-Baton. Law & Order, 16. |
| [98] |
Applegate, Col. Rex. (1963, Mar.). The Organization and
Tactics of Professional Riot Control Forces. Army, 53. |
| [99] |
Arbetter, Lisa. (1994, Jun.). A Pepper Pinch. Security
Management, 38, 14-15. |
| [100] |
Arbrogast, Walter W. (1976, Jan.). Soft/Sting Ring Airfoil
Grenade Civil Disturbance Control System. Edgewood Arsenal, Maryland: Weapons Systems
Concept Office. |
| [101] |
Arkin, William. (1995, Dec.). Vienna Meeting Sets Ban on
Blinding Laser Weapons. Laser Focus World, 31, (12), 62. |
| [102] |
Arkin, William. (1995, 17 Jul.). Ban Tactical Laser
Weapons: DoD Maintains Blinding is Not Violation of War. Defense News, 20. |
| [103] |
Arkin, William. (1995, 10 May.). The Pentagon's Blind
Ambition (Blinding Laser Weapons). Opinion-Editorial. New York Times (Late New York
Edition), A23. |
| [104] |
Army Times. (1994, 10 Oct.). Perry seeks directive on
nonlethal warfare feat, 34. |
| [105] |
Arquilla, John & Ronfeldt, David. (1992). Cyberwar is
Coming! RAND Pamphlet P-7791. Santa Monica, California: The RAND Corporation. |
| [106] |
Ary, USMC. Maj. Vaughn A. (1996, Aug.). New Rules of
Engagement for Today's Missions. Unpublished paper. |
| [107] |
Atkinson, Rick.(1995, 26 Feb.). Bullets to beanbags: A
military evolution. The Kansas City Star, A-1. |
| [108] |
Atkinson, Rick. (1995, 25 Feb.). Marines test new arsenal
for Somalia. Washington Post, Internet. |
| [109] |
Atwal, Kay & Tapscott, Mark. (1993, Apr.). Non-lethal
Laser Rifle Testing at Fort Bragg, Naval Anti-Missile Laser is Readied for Sea. Defense
Electronics, 25, 18-19. |
| [110] |
Audsley, David (1989, Fal.) Flash/Sound Diversionary
Device Evaluation. The Tactical Edge, 6. |
| [111] |
Aviation Week & Space Technology. (1995). Panel's
Report Backs Nonlethal Weapons- High-Priiority Emerging Missions May Bring Development
Push, 143, (16) 50. |
| [112] |
Aviation Week & Space Technology. (1994, 24 Jan.)
Government/Military: John B. Alexander, program manager for Nonlethal Defense, Los Alamos
(NM) National Laboratory (Aerospace Laureate), 140, (4) 19-20. |
| [113] |
Aviation Week & Space Technology. (1993, 24 May.).
Army Prepares for Non-Lethal Combat (Low Collateral Damage Munitions program). 138, (21)
62. |
| [114] |
Aviation Week & Space Technology. (1992, 7 Dec.).
Nonlethal Weapons Give Peacekeepers Flexibility. 137, (23) 50-51. |
| [115] |
Bacon, LtCol. Douglas C. (1980, Oct.). Battlefield Lasers:
A New Problem With an Old Cure. Military Review, 60 (10) 33-39. |
| [116] |
Baker, David. (1994, Oct.). Wizard Wars & Air Power in
the 21st Century-- Part 2. Air International, 47, 214-217. |
| [117] |
Balzar, John. (1995, 25 Feb.). Marines take a Tip from
L.A. Riots Somalia: Southland crowd control failures lead to non-lethal devices that may
cut casualties as troops shield U.N. pullout. Los Angeles Times, Internet. |
| [118] |
Bandman, A.L. & Savateyev, Med Col. N.V. (1977).
Toxicology of CR. Voyenno-Meditsinskiy Zhurnal, 3, 84-86. UDC 615.9:623. 459.43., 126-130. |
| [119] |
Barrie, Darwin N. (1988, Jun.). Maricopa County's
evaluation of less-than-lethal electronic devices. The Police Chief, 55, (6) 17. |
| [120] |
Barry, Col. John L., Everett, LtCol. Michael W. & Peck, LtCol. Allen G.(1994). Nonlethal Military Means: New Leverage for a New Era. Policy
Analysis Paper 94-01, National Security Program. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard
University, John F. Kennedy School of Government. |
| [121] |
Barry, J. & Morganthau, T. (1994, 7 Feb.). Soon,
'Phasers on Stun.' Newsweek, 123, (6) 24-26. |
| [122] |
Baugham, T. Frank. (1942). The ABC of Practical Riot Gun
Instruction. Washington, District of Columbia: National Rifle Association. |
| [123] |
Beal, Cliff. (1995, Dec.). Bang! Bang! You're Not Dead.
Focus, 63. |
| [124] |
Becker, Jon B. (1996, Spr.). The Legal Aspects of
Diversionary Devices. The Tactical Edge, 53. |
| [125] |
Becker, Jon B. & Heal, Charles. (1996, Feb.)
Less-Than-Lethal Force: Doctrine must lead the technology rush. International Defense
Review, 29, (2) 62-64. |
| [126] |
Beecher, W. (1966, Feb.). Chemical versus Viet Cong: right
or wrong? The National Guardsman, 20. |
| [127] |
Begert, USMC. LtCol. Matthew. (1996, 5 Jun.). Non-Lethal
Applications: A USMC View. Slide Series. U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command, "Visions of Future Conflict- Test Technology Drivers," Symposium, Johns Hopkins
University, Laurel, Maryland. |
| [128] |
Begley, Sharon. (1994, 7 Feb.). One Pill Makes You Larger,
One Pill Makes You Small... Newsweek, 123, (6) 37. |
| [129] |
Bender, Frank. (1974, Nov.-Dec.). Ring Airfoil Grenades.
National Defense. |
| [130] |
Bernstein, Theodore. (1985, 22 Jan.). Evaluation of the
Electric Shock Hazard for the Nova XR 5000 Stun Gun. Unpublished. Madison Wisconsin:
University of Wisconsin. |
| [131] |
Betts, R. & Denton, F. (1967, Oct.). An evaluation of
chemical crop destruction in Vietnam. RAND Corporation Memo. RM-5446 ISA/ARPA. Santa
Monica, California. |
| [132] |
Biggs, M. (1990). Non-Lethal Weapons: A tool for law
enforcement, 6 (1) 37-43. |
| [133] |
Blumenfeld, Stewart N. (1968). Employment of the Riot
Control Agent CS in Vietnam. Office of the Science Advisor, Military Assistance Command,
Vietnam. |
| [134] |
Blumenthal, R. (1970, 15 Mar.). US shows signs of concern
over effect in Vietnam of 9-year defoliation program. The New York Times. |
| [135] |
Blundy, David & Pringle, Peter. (1974, 27 Oct.). New
Ulster riot control gas worries experts. London Times. |
| [136] |
Bodenheimer, T.S. & Rose, L. (1968, Aug.). Mace.
Survival, 10. |
| [137] |
Boffey, P. M. (1971, Jan.). Herbicides in Vietnam, AAAS
study finds widespread devastation. Science, 171. |
| [138] |
Bowers, M.B. et al. (1960, Jun.). Interim report of CS
exposures in plant workers. U.S. Chemical Warfare Laboratories Technical Memo.
CWL-TM-24-50. |
| [139] |
Brady, LtCol. Robert. (1995, July.). Tofflers missed
importance of nonlethal weapons. Letters to the Editor. Special Warfare, 8, (3) 45. |
| [140] |
Bramwell, E.C.B. (1961, Feb.). Skin reaction and
sensitivity to CS. Porton Tech Paper 757. |
| [141] |
Breit, J.M. (1965, Mar.). Nonlethal Incapacitating-Weapon:
Liquid Stream Projector Feasibility Study. Technical Paper No. RAC-TP-168 submitted to
Advanced Projects Agency, Washington, D.C. under contract No. SD-212). McLean, Virginia:
Research Analysis Corporation. |
| [142] |
Brennan, Dennis T. (1976, Apr.). Riot Control Without
Bloodshed: The Soft/Sting Ring Airfoil Grenade. A Feasibility Review of the U.S. Army's
Experimental Civil Disturbance Control System. Cleveland, Ohio: City of Cleveland, Office
of the Mayor. |
| [143] |
Bruel, P.V. & Olesen, H.P. (1973). Infrasonic
Measurements. B.K. Technical Review, 3, 14-25. |
| [144] |
Budiansky, Stephen. (1987, 20 Jul.). All stuck up, no way
to go. U.S. News & World Report, 62. |
| [145] |
Bunker, Robert J. (1996, Aut.). Advanced Battlespace and
Cybermaneuver Concepts: Implications for Force XXI. Parameters, 26 (3) 108-120. |
| [146] |
Bunker, Robert J. (1996, May.-Jun.). Nonlethal Defense II
Conference. Military Review, 76, (3) 90. |
| [147] |
Bunker, Dr. Robert J. (1996, Feb.). Fourth Epoch War:
Strategic Considerations and Responses. Prepared for Command's Warfighting Lab, Marine
Corps Combat Development Command (MCCDC). NSSP Report 96-1. San Bernardino, California:
National Security Studies Program, California State University, San Bernardino. |
| [148] |
Bunker, Robert J. (1995, 28 Aug.). U.S. Must Seize the
Future With Tactical Laser Development. Defense News, 15, 19. |
| [149] |
Bunker, Robert J. & Moore, T. Lindsay. (1996, Feb).
Nonlethal Technology and Fourth Epoch War: A New Paradigm of Politico-Military Force. Land
Warfare Paper No. 23. Arlington, Virginia: Institute of Land Warfare, Association United
States Army. |
| [150] |
Bureau of Prisons, U.S. Department of Justice. (1949,
Nov.). Use of Tear Gas and Smoke. |
| [151] |
Burnett, Richard. (1993, 24 Oct.). Contractors Hatch New
Weapons. The Orlando Sentinel. |
| [152] |
Burnett, W.A. et al. (1961, May). The influence of
particle size on the subjective effects of CS. Porton Tech. Paper 776. |
| [153] |
Business Week. (1972, 29 Jul.). The hunt for nonlethal
guns, (2239) 34-36. |
| [154] |
California Legislature & Assembly, Committee on
Criminal Justice. (1977). Less-Than Lethal Weapons: Hearing, Los Angeles, California Oct
22, 1976. Sacramento, California: Assembly Publications Office. |
| [155] |
Campbell, C. (1992, 27 Sep.). The lethal bomb that does
not kill. Sunday Telegraph, 6. |
| [156] |
Campbell, Donald & Egner, Donald O. (1976, Jan.).
Modeling for Less-Lethal Chemical Devices. Technical Memorandum 2-76. Aberdeen Proving
Ground, Maryland: U.S. Army Human Engineering Laboratory. |
| [157] |
Cantrow, Ellen. (1988, Oct.). Not Tears Alone (Israeli use
of tear gas in West Bank and Gaza). Technology Review, 91, 16-17. |
| [158] |
Capaccio, Tony. (1995, 23 Jan.). U.S. Commanders State
Uses for Non-Lethal Technology. Defense Week, 16, 3. |
| [159] |
Casey, Joe D. (1988, Feb.). Research and Development
Needed for Less-Than-Lethal Weapons. The Police Chief, 55, (2) 7. |
| [160] |
The Center for Advanced Command Concepts and Technology
(ACT). (1995, Nov.). Operations Other Than War (OOTW): The Technological Dimension.
Washington, DC: National Defense University. |
| [161] |
Chemical Weapons Convention Bulletin. (1994, Mar.), 23. |
| [162] |
Chief of the Defence Staff, Canada. (1976, 1 Sep.). Riot
Control Agent Dibenz (b,f) -1, 4 - Oxazepine (CR). Canadian Force Technical Order. NSN
1365-21-873-1605. C-77-206-000/AF-000. |
| [163] |
Chicago Police Department, Training Division. (1961). Tear
Gas Manual. Chicago, Illinois. |
| [164] |
Cline, Ray S. (1991, 27 Feb.). Warfare's New Era.
Washington Times, 58. |
| [165] |
Coates, Joseph F. (1972, Jun.). Non-Lethal Police Weapons.
Technology Review, 49-56. |
| [166] |
Coates, Joseph F. (1972). Nonlethal, Nondestructive
Warfare. P-569. Arlington, Virginia: Institute for Defense Analyses. |
| [167] |
Coates, Joseph F. (1970). Nonlethal and Nondestructive
Combat in Cities Overseas. Washington, District of Columbia: Institute for Defense
Analyses, Science and Technology Division. |
| [168] |
Coates, Joseph F. (1969). Nonlethal Chemical Agents.
Washington, District of Columbia: International Association of Chiefs of Police. |
| [169] |
Coates, Joseph F. (1968, May.). Safe Police Weapons.
Science and Technology, (77). |
| [170] |
Coates, Joseph F. (1967, Nov.). Nonlethal Weapons for Use
by Law Enforcement Officers. Study No. S-271. Arlington, Virginia: Institute for Defense
Analysis, Science and Technology Division. |
| [171] |
Collins, John M. (1995, 14 Sep.). Nonlethal Weapons and
Operations: Potential Applications and Practical Limitations. CRS Report for Congress
95-974 S. Washington, District of Columbia: Congressional Research Service. |
| [172] |
Commandant's Warfighting Lab (CWL). (1995, Dec.). Draft
Non-Lethal Technology Functional Concept. Quantico, Virginia: United States Marine Corps.
Under Redraft. |
| [173] |
Commodity Management Office, Department of the Army.
(1969, Jul.). Riot-Control-Agent CS, Munitions and Dispersers. Edgewood Arsenal, Maryland. |
| [174] |
Computerworld. (1990-1991, 24 Dec.-1 Jan.). Joy to the
World, 24, 72. Computer viruses as nonlethal weapons. |
| [175] |
Conine, Ernest. (1975, 26 Sep.). A Nonlethal Substitute
for the Handgun? Los Angeles Times. |
| [176] |
Cook III, USAF. Maj. Joseph W, Fiely, USAF. Maj. David P. & McGowan, USAF. Maj. Maura T. (1995, Special Edition.). Nonlethal Weapons:
Technologies, Legalities, and Potential Policies. Airpower Journal, 9, (SE) 77-91. |
| [177] |
Cook, III. Maj. Joseph W. et al. (1994, 27 Jun.).
Non-Lethal Weapons and Special Operations. For HQ USAF/XOXI. Air Force Academy, Colorado
Springs, Colorado: USAF Institute for National Security Studies. |
| [178] |
Cook, Nick. (1992, 10 Oct.). Russia leads in "pulse" weapons. Jane's Defence Weekly, 18, (15) 5. |
| [179] |
Cooper, Pat & Holzer, Robert. (1996, 29 Apr.).
Loophole Allows Officials to Deny Technology Funds (non-lethals). Defense News, 11, (17)
12. |
| [180] |
Cooper, Pat. (1996, 22-28 Jul.). DOD Guides Nonlethal
Weapon Use. Defense News, 11, (29) 8. |
| [181] |
Cooper, Pat. (1995, 24 Jul.). Nonlethals Get Funding Plan:
Senators Urge U.S. Military to Explore Technology. Defense News, 10, 18. |
| [182] |
Cooper, Pat. (1995, 27 Feb.-5 Mar.). U.S. Tests Nonlethal
Weapon Policy in Somalia. Defense News, 10, 28. |
| [183] |
Cooper, Pat & Erlich, Jeff. (1996, 5-11 Feb.). U.S.
Troops to Field Shortstop Against Shells in Bosnia. Defense News, 11, 22. |
| [184] |
Cooper, Pat & Opall, Barbara. (1994, 19-25 Sep.).
Perry Plans to Launch Nonlethal Warfare Effort. Defense News, 9, 6. |
| [185] |
Cooper, Pat & Opall, Barbara. (1994, 10 Oct.). Perry
seeks directive on nonlethal warfare feat. Army Times, 34. |
| [186] |
Council for Science and Society. (1978). Harmless Weapons.
Chichester, Great Britain. |
| [187] |
County of San Diego Office of The Medical Examiner.(1994,
1 Jul.). Autopsy Report on Daniel Lee Price ME#94-1204. |
| [188] |
Craig, F.N. et al. (1960, Jun.). Breathing patterns during
exposure to CS. U.S. Army Chemical Warfare Laboratories Rep. CW2-2399. |
| [189] |
Creasy, W.M. (1958, May.-Jun.). Toxicological Warfare.
Ordnance, 42. |
| [190] |
Crichton, D. (1959). A study of the toxicity of CS. Porton
Tech. Paper 672. |
| [191] |
Crichton, D. et al. (1959, declassified 1968, Jun.).
Agents for riot control: the selection of T. 792 (o-chlorobenzal malonoitrile) as a
candidate agent to replace CN. Porton Tech. Paper 651. |
| [192] |
Crime Control Digest. (1992, 30 Nov.). Detroit, LAPD, 26,
(48). Studying Use of Non-Lethal Weapons. |
| [193] |
Criminal Justice Newsletter. (1994, 1 Aug.). California
Agencies Search for Less-Lethal Weapons, 25, (15) 2. |
| [194] |
Crockett, Thompson S.(1969). Police Chemical Agents
Manual. Washington. District of Columbia: International Association of Chiefs of Police. |
| [195] |
Cuadros, Jaime H. (1995, 24 May.). Non-Lethal and
Less-Than-Lethal Weapons. Advanced Weapon Systems AWJC-8. |
| [196] |
Cuadros, Jaime H. (1994, Jan.). Non-Lethal Weapons: Course
Outline. Presented at the 7th ASLET International Training Seminar, Washington, District
of Columbia. Hacienda Heights, California: Arts and Engineering. |
| [197] |
Cuadros, Jaime H. (1993, Nov.). Kinetic Energy Less-Lethal
Projectile Technology. Presented at the Non-Lethal Defense Conference, Johns Hopkins
University, Laurel, Maryland. Hacienda Heights, California: Arts and Engineering. |
| [198] |
Cuadros, Jaime H. (1993, Sep.). Terminal Ballistics of
Non-Lethal Projectiles. Presented at 14th Annual Symposium on Ballistics, Quebec, Canada.
Hacienda Heights, California: Arts and Engineering. |
| [199] |
Cuadros, Jaime H. (1993, 1 Jun.). A Training Manual for
Flexible Baton Selection and Use. Hollister, California: MK Ballistic Systems. |
| [200] |
Cuadros, Jaime H. (1993, Apr.). A Comparison Between
Rubber Bullets and Shot Bags. Hollister, California: MK Ballistic Systems. |
| [201] |
Cuadros, Jaime H. (1992, 30 Nov.-3 Dec.). A Non-Lethal
Projectile Concept for Military, Law Enforcement and Civilian Use. Presented at the Small
Arms Division Meeting, American Defense Preparedness Association, San Antonio, Texas.
Hacienda Heights, California: Arts and Engineering. |
| [202] |
Curtis, Liz. (1982). They Shoot Children: The Use of
Rubber and Plastic Bullets in the North of Ireland. London, England: Information on
Ireland. |
| [203] |
Daley, Dorthy E., Hayes, Roger M. & Swint, Lloyd, E.
(1995, Jul.). Oleoresin capsicum: don't let the fancy name fool you (pepper spray).
Corrections Today, 57, 24. |
| [204] |
Davidson, Keay. (1992, 2 Feb.). War without Death may be
on its Way. San Francisco Examiner, 1. |
| [205] |
Davis, Malcolm. (1994, Apr.-May.). How to win wars without
actually killing. Asia-Pacific Defense Reporter, 20, 36-37. |
| [206] |
Davis, Sherman L. (1970, Jun.). Riot Control Weapons for
the Vietnam War. Historical Monograph AMC 56M. Edgewood Arsenal, Maryland: Edgewood
Arsenal, U.S. Army Munitions Command. |
| [207] |
de Bakker, et al. (1990, Aug.). Laser Weapons at Sea.
International Defense Review, 23, (8) 853-856. |
| [208] |
Debban, LtCol. Alan W. (1993, Spring). Disabling Systems:
War-Fighting Option for the Future. Airpower Journal, 7, (1) 44-50. |
| [209] |
Debban, Alan W. (1993, 22 Feb.). Disabling Technologies
and Applications. HQ USAF/XOXT Background Paper. |
| [210] |
De Caro, Chuck. (1994). Sats, Lies, and Video-Rape: The
Soft War Handbook. McLean, Virginia: Aerobureau Corporation. |
| [211] |
Defense Daily. (1994, 25 May.). DOD to Adopt Policy on
Non-Lethal Weapons by Late 1994, 183, 301-302. |
| [212] |
Defense Electronics. (1995, March). Russians Continue Work
on Sophisticated Acoustic Weaponry, 26, 12. |
| [213] |
Defense Electronics. (1992, Mar.). DOD Urged to Adopt
Nonlethal Warfare Strategy, 24, 22. |
| [214] |
Defense Electronics. (1992, Mar.). Examples of Nonlethal
Weapons, 24, 22. |
| [215] |
Defense News. (1996, 8-14 Jul.). Countermine Technologies
Flow From Increased Threat, 10. |
| [216] |
Defense News. (1996, 10-16 Jun.). Olin Ordnance to Test
Nonlethal Vehicle Trap, 11, (23) 27. |
| [217] |
Defense News. (1996, 6-12 May.). Open Door for Nonlethals,
11, (18) 18. |
| [218] |
Defense News. (1996, 11-17 Mar.). Nonlethal Technology
Wins Commander Nod, 11, (10) 2. |
| [219] |
Defense News. (1995, 25 Sep.-1 Oct.). Laser Stance Is on
Target, 26. |
| [220] |
Defense News. (1994, 19-25 Oct.). Military Studies Unusual
Arsenal. |
| [221] |
Defense News. (1994, 19-25 Sep.). Perry Plans to Launch
Nonlethal Warfare Effort, 6. |
| [222] |
Defense News. (1994, 28 Mar.-3 Apr.). DoD to Boost
Nonlethal Options, 46. |
| [223] |
Defense News. (1994, 7-13 Feb.). Lasers, Viruses, May Rule
No-Fly Sky Zone, 1, 45. |
| [224] |
Defense News. (1993, 22-28 Nov.). Non-Lethal Weapons Group
Set to Form in March, 1, 14. |
| [225] |
Defense News. (1993, 11-17 Jan.). U.S. Explores
Mind-Control Technology, 4, 29. |
| [226] |
Defense Week. (1994, 18 Jan.). CIA Asked to Review "Buck Rogers" Weapon, 6. |
| [227] |
Defense Week. (1992, 19 Oct.). Army Gives a Boost to
Exotic Non-Lethal Weapons. |
| [228] |
de la Taille, Renaud. (1980). Brief Survey of Non-Wounding
Anti-Riot Weapons. FSTC-HT-1092-79. Charlottesville, Maryland: U.S. Army Foreign Science
and Technology Center. |
| [229] |
Department of Defense Directive. (1996, 9 Jul.). Policy
for Non-Lethal Weapons. No. 3000.3. |
| [230] |
Department of Defense. (1994, 14 Oct.). DOD Activities in
Non-Lethal Weapons. 94-S-4521. |
| [231] |
Dettling, J.R. & Mawhinney, R.C. (1972, 2 Oct.).
Stun-Gun Preliminary Terminal Effects Study. MB-R-72/77. San Ramon, California: MBA
Associates. |
| [232] |
Dobbs, Herbert H. et al. (1990, Sep.). Assessment of
Mission Kill Concept, Requirements, and Technologies. Prepared by System Planning
Corporation, Arlington, Virginia. Washington, District of Columbia: Defense Advanced
Research Projects Agency. |
| [233] |
Dworetzky, Tom. (1987, Nov.). Bag-em with the Un-Gun
(Less-Lethal Bean Bag Weapons). Discover, 8, 26-27. |
| [234] |
The Economist. (1994, 15 Oct.). Thou Shall Not Blind
(inhumane laser guns). 333, (7885) 54. |
| [235] |
Edgewood Arsenal, MD, Directorate of Medical Research.
(1983). Special Summary Report of Toxicology of CN, CS, and DM. Washington, District of
Columbia: International Association of Chiefs of Police. First published in 1965, Sep. |
| [236] |
Edgewood Arsenal, MD. (1967, Oct.). Characteristics of
Riot Control Agent CS. EASP 600-1/AD 661 319. Edgewood Arsenal, Maryland: Department of
the Army. |
| [237] |
Egner, D.O. & Williams, L.W. (1975). Standard
Scenarios for the Less Lethal Weapons Evaluation Model. Technical Memorandum 20-75.
Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland: U.S. Army Human Engineering Laboratory. |
| [238] |
Egner, D.O. & Campbell, D.(1975, Aug.). Testing and
Evaluation of Chemical Weapons. Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland: U.S. Army Land Warfare
Laboratory. |
| [239] |
Egner, D.O. et al. (1974, May.). The Effectiveness of Less
Lethal Weapons Utilizing Chemical Agents. Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland: U.S. Army
Human Engineering Laboratory. |
| [240] |
Egner, D.O. et al. (1973). A Multidisciplinary Technique
for the Evaluation of Less Lethal Weapons. Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland: U.S. Army
Land Warfare Laboratory. |
| [241] |
Ellis, R.H. & Kellog, J.C. (1966, Sep.). Implications
of the Use of Incapacitating Agents in Warfare. Report No. 7675-2225 submitted to
Headquarters, U.S. Air Force, Washington D.C., under contract No. AF 49 (638)-1584.
Hartford, Connecticut: Travelers Research Center. |
| [242] |
Ehmke, Charles. (1966). The Use of Non-Lethal Chemical
Agents in Limited Warfare. Thesis. Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama: Air Command and Staff
College. |
| [243] |
Epstein, J.S. & Kelso, M.A. (1995, 14 Mar.).
Non-Lethal Weapons, An Overview of Policy and Technology. Slide Series. Center for
International Security and Arms Control, Stanford University. |
| [244] |
Evancoe, Paul. (1994, Jun.). Tomorrow's Weapons of Choice?
Military Technology, 18, 68-71. |
| [245] |
Evancoe, Paul. (1994, May.-Jun.). Non-lethal Alternatives
Weighed by Law Officers. National Defense, 73, (498) 28-30. |
| [246] |
Evancoe, Paul. (1993, Dec.). Non-Lethal Technologies
Enhance Warrior's Punch. National Defense, 73, (493) 26-29. |
| [247] |
Evancoe, Paul & Bentley, Mark. (1994, May). CVW:
Computer Virus as a Technology Weapon. Military Technology, 18, 38-40. |
| [248] |
Evers, Stacey. (1993, 19 Nov.). Police, Prisons Want Cheap
Non-lethal Technologies. Aerospace Daily, 299. |
| [249] |
Facts on File. (1995, 19 Oct.). Blinding Laser Weapon Ban
Implemented. 55, (2864) 781. |
| [250] |
Faul, Denis. (1982, Oct.). Plastic Bullets- Plastic
Government: Deaths and Injuries by Plastic Bullets, August 1981- October 1982. |
| [251] |
Ferretti, F. (1976, 4 Jan.). Zap! New York Times Magazine,
13-16. |
| [252] |
Fetter, Gregory. (1992, 22 Apr.). The Ring Airfoil
Grenade- A Weapon Whose Time Has Come. World Weapons Review, (134), 5-8. |
| [253] |
Fischetti, Mark. (1995, Jan.). Less-Than-Lethal Weapons.
Technology Review, 98, (1) 14-15. |
| [254] |
Flatau, Abraham et al. (1974). Summary of Technical
Presentations for the STING RAG Validation In-Process Review and Soft RAG-Concept
Feasibility In-Process Review. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: U.S. Army Armament
Command. |
| [255] |
Flatau, Abraham. (1976, 15-16 Sep.). The XM234 Launcher
Adapter for M16 Rifle. Unedited Preliminary Summary Report. Presented at the 1976 Annual
Meeting, Small Arms Systems Division, American Defense Preparedness Association, Picatinny
Arsenal, Dover, New Jersey. |
| [256] |
Florig, H. Keith. (1988, Mar.). The future battlefield: a
blast of gigawatts? IEEE Spectrum, 25, (3) 50-54. |
| [257] |
Fortune. (1994, 11 Jul.). How Cops will Rearm, Tom Clancy
Style, 16. |
| [258] |
Foster-Miller, Inc. A. Mangolds. (1990). Soft Kill of
Fielded Weapons Systems. Weston, Massachusetts. |
| [259] |
Frost, Dr. Gerald & Shipbaugh, Dr. Calvin. (1994, 1
Feb.). GPS Targeting for Non-Lethal Systems. RAND Publication RP-262, Santa Monica,
California: The RAND Corporation. |
| [260] |
Fulghum, David A. (1994, 19 Sep.). Air Force May Delay
JPATS, TSSAM (Carbon-Fiber Weapon). Aviation Week & Space Technology, 141, (12) 26-27. |
| [261] |
Fulghum, David A. (1993, 24 May.). EMP Weapons Lead Race
for Non-Lethal Technology. Aviation Week & Space Technology, 138, (21) 61. |
| [262] |
Fulghum, David A. (1993, 22 Feb.). ALCMS Given Nonlethal
Role (air-launched cruise missiles fitted with electromagnetic pulse generators). Aviation
Week & Space Technology, 138, (8) 20-22. |
| [263] |
Fulghum, David A. (1992, 17 Aug.). US Weighs Use of
Nonlethal Weapons in Serbia If U.N. Decides to Fight. Aviation Week & Space
Technology, 137, (7) 62-63. |
| [264] |
Fulghum, David A. (1992, 27 Apr.). Secret Carbon-Fiber
Warheads Blinded Iraqi Air Defenses. Aviation Week & Space Technology, 136, (17)
18-20. |
| [265] |
Fulton, Roger. (1995, Sep.). The Law Enforcement
Technology Network. Law Enforcement Technology, 26. |
| [266] |
Fulton, Roger. (1995, Sep.). When Law Enforcement Met
Industry...Transferring Military Technology. Law Enforcement Technology, 56. |
| [267] |
Futrell, A. (1988). History and development of the
side-handle baton power strike and the PPCT side-handle baton system. Millstadt, Illinios:
PPCT Research Publications. |
| [268] |
Gallego, F. & Daly, M. (1990, 13 Jan.). Laser weapon
in Royal Navy service. Jane's Defence Weekly. |
| [269] |
Galston, A.W. (1968, Jun.). Military uses of herbicides in
Vietnam. The New Scientist. |
| [270] |
Galston, A.W. (1967, Aug.-Sep.). Changing the environment:
herbicides in Vietnam. Scientist and Citizen, 2. |
| [271] |
Garwin, Richard L. (1994, Oct.). Secret Weapons for the
CNN Era. Harper's, 289, (1773) 17-18. |
| [272] |
Gee, USA. Maj. Robert W. (1994, Dec.). Military Police
Nonlethal Technology Program. Briefing Slides. Battle Lab Support Division. Fort
McClellan, Alabama: U.S. Military Police School. |
| [273] |
General Ordnance Equipment Corporation. (1968). A Series
of Reports on Chemical Mace Non-Lethal Weapons. |
| [274] |
Gips, Michael. (1995, Apr.). One-stop shop. Security
Management, 39 (4) 11. Law enforcement database (less-than lethal). |
| [275] |
Goldblat, J. (1970, Apr.). Are tear gas weapons and
herbicides permitted weapons? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 26. |
| [276] |
Gongwer, L.E. et al. (1958, Nov.). The comparative
effectiveness of four riot control agents. U.S. Army Chemical Warfare Laboratories Tech.
Memo. CWL-TM-24-18. |
| [277] |
Goodman, Jr. Glenn W. (1994, Jul.). Upping the Nonlethal
Ante: Pentagon Funds A New Weapons Initiative. Armed Forces Journal International, 131,
(12) 13. |
| [278] |
Goodman, Jr. Glenn W. (1988, May.). US Electronic Systems
Highly Vulnerable to Radio-Frequency Beam Weapons. Armed Forces Journal International, 87,
(10) 20. |
| [279] |
Gourley, Scott R. (1995, Apr.). The Sniper's Latest
Nightmare. International Defense Review, 66. |
| [280] |
Gray, Jan M. (1995, 17 Jul.). Uses of Nonlethal Force in
Army Operations. White paper, draft. Fort Monroe, Virginia: US Army Training and Doctrine
Command. |
| [281] |
Grossman, Elaine M. (1994, 15 Apr.). Pentagon to Set
Priorities in Non-lethal Technologies, Weapons. Inside the Air Force, 1. |
| [282] |
Grossman, Jon. (1991, Jul.). Military Lasers: A Costly
Search for Ultimate Weapons. Photonics Spectra, 25, (7) 84-92. |
| [283] |
Grudowski, Mike. (1995, 13 Apr.). Not-so-lethal weapons
(police weapons). New York Times Magazine, 40-41. |
| [284] |
Gunther, Judith, Suzanne, Kantra & Langreth, Robert N.
(1994, Sep.). The Digital Warrior. Popular Science, 245, 60-64. |
| [285] |
Gurganious, Joseph T. (1974). Riot Control Barrier:
Concept Development and Feasibility Test. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: U.S. Army
Land Warfare Laboratory. |
| [286] |
Gutentag, P.J. & Hart, J. (1960, Apr.). The evaluation
of CS aerosols as a riot control agent in man. U.S. Army Chemical Warfare Laboratories
Rep. CWL-2365. |
| [287] |
Hammick, Murray. (1991, Aug.). Laser protection for AFV's:
the eyes have it. International Defense Review, 818-821. |
| [288] |
Hanley, William C. (1968). Berkeley Police Department Use
of Chemical Mace. City Manager Report No. 68-37. Berkeley, California. |
| [289] |
Hannant, Philip. (1977). Nonlethal Weapons for Law
Enforcement. Thesis. Central Missouri State University. |
| [290] |
Hansen, George. (1966). Non-Lethal Gases for Guerrilla
Warfare. Professional Study. Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama: Air War College. |
| [291] |
Harris, Bill. (1993, May.). Less-than-lethal munitions to
give Army greater flexibility. Ordnance, 22-23. |
| [292] |
Hartford Democrat/AP News. (1978, 20 Dec.). At CSL 1978
Was A Year of Advances: Riot Control Device & New Army Weapon (Sting RAG). |
| [293] |
Hayeslip, Ph.D. David W. & Preszler, Ph.D. Alan.
(1993, Mar.). NIJ Initiative on Less-Than-Lethal Weapons. NCJ 133523. Research in Brief. |
| [294] |
Headquarters, Department of the Army. (1993). Grenade,
Hand: Riot Control, CS, ABC-M7A3, (1330-6963), Ammunition Surveillance Procedures. Supply
Bulletin; SB 742-1330-94-322. Washington, District of Columbia. |
| [295] |
Headquarters, Department of the Army. (1989). Operator's
Manual: Cartridge, 40-Millimeter, Riot Control CS, XM674 and Cartridge, 40-Millimeter, Red
Smoke RS, XM675. Tecnical Manual; TM 3-1310-244-10. Washington, District of Columbia. |
| [296] |
Headquarters United States Air Force, Special Technical
Plans Division. (1991, 13 Sep.). Position Paper on the Air Force Role in Development of
Disabling Systems/Strategy. |
| [297] |
Heal, Sid. (1994, Win.). Diversionary Devices: "Down
and Dirty." The Tactical Edge, 26-30. |
| [298] |
Heal, Sid. (1990, Spr.). Flashbangs: Why and How, Part
III. The Tactical Edge, 7-11. |
| [299] |
Heal, Sid.(1990, Win.). Flashbangs: Why and How, Part II.
The Tactical Edge, 20-22. |
| [300] |
Heal, Sid. (1990, Jul.). Flashbangs: Effective Use of
Diversionary Devices. The Police Chief, 18-24. |
| [301] |
Heal, Sid. (1989, Fal.). Flashbangs: Why and How. The
Tactical Edge, 9-11. |
| [302] |
Heal, Sid & Evancoe, Paul. (1996, Sep.-Oct.).
Nonlethal Disabling Technology: A Future Reality. Police and Security News, 3-16. |
| [303] |
Heal, Charles S. & Kolman, John. (1989). Flash/Sound
Diversionary Devices. Training Key #391, 17. Alexandria, Virginia: International
Association of Chiefs of Police |
| [304] |
Hearing on Public Sale of Protective Sprays. (1969).
Consumer Subcommittee on Commerce, 91st Congress, First Session. |
| [305] |
Hecht, Jeff. (1992, Aug.). Lasers Designed to Blind. New
Scientist, 135, (1833) 27-31. |
| [306] |
Hellreich, A. et al. (1967, Jan.). The effects of
thermally-generated CS aerosols on human skin. Edgewood Arsenal Technical Report. 4075,
AD809485. |
| [307] |
Hemenway, David & Weil, Douglas. (1990, Win.). Phasers
on Stun: The Case for Less Lethal Weapons. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 9,
(1) 94-98. |
| [308] |
Herby, Peter. (1995, Mar.-Apr.). Outlaw blinding: Weapons
intended to blind soldiers on the battlefield must, like chemical and biological weapons,
be banned. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 51, (2) 4. |
| [309] |
Herskovitz, Don. (1993, Aug.). Killing Them Softly.
Journal of Defense Electronics, 16, 41-42. |
| [310] |
Heun, Christopher T. (1996, Sep.). Holograms Halt
Contraband; New Sensor Detects Bombs (Saber 203 Info). National Defense, 81, (520), 19. |
| [311] |
Higgins, John. (1967). Non-Lethal Chemical Weapons in
Counterinsurgency. Thesis. Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama: Air Command and Staff College. |
| [312] |
Hiltermann, Joost & Arkin, William. (1995, 23 Oct.).
No Blinding Lasers. Defense News, 29. Letters to the Editor. |
| [313] |
Himmelspach, Darlene. (1995, 18 Oct.). Leathernecks' new
devices are not deadly, but they're effective. San Diego Union-Tribune, Internet. |
| [314] |
Himsworth, Sir H. et al. (1971). Report of the enquiry
into the medical and toxicological aspects of CS. Part II. London, England: Her Majesty's
Stationary Office. |
| [315] |
Hoffman, Lisa. (1996, 10 Aug.). Pentagon backs use of
nonlethal weapons. The San-Diego Union Tribune, A-25. |
| [316] |
Holland, P. (1974). Cutaneous Reactions Produced by
Dibenz-(b,f)-1,4-oxazepine (CR). British Journal of Dermatology. |
| [317] |
Holzer, R. & Munro, N. (1992, 13-19 Apr.). Microwave
weapon stuns Iraqis. Defense News, 1. |
| [318] |
Horgan, John. (1994, Apr.). Bang! You're Alive: An unusual
trio wins support for "nonlethal" weapons. Scientific American, 270, (4) 22-24. |
| [319] |
House, W.B. et al. (1967, Dec.). Assessment of the
ecological effects of extensive or repeated use of herbicides. Midwest Research Institute
Report. AD 824314. |
| [320] |
Howard, Stuart & Hitt, William D. (1966, 2 May.).
Intercultural differences in olfaction. ARPA-Project AGILE Report. Columbus, Ohio:
Battelle Memorial Institute. |
| [321] |
Hu, Howard, et al. (1989, 4 Aug.). Tear Gas: Harassing
Agent or Toxic Chemical Weapon. Journal of the American Medical Association, 262, 660. |
| [322] |
Huddle, F.P. (1969). Technology-assessment of the Vietnam
defoliant matter; a case history. U.S. Congress, House of Representatives, 91st.
Congress., Cie. on Science and Astronautics. |
| [323] |
Hunter, John C. (1994, May.). Pepper Spray. Focus on Use
of Force. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 63, 24-26. |
| [324] |
Hunter, USAF. Maj. Roger C. (1994, Fal.). Disabling
Systems and the Air Force. Airpower Journal, 7, (3) 43-47. |
| [325] |
Hurlburt, T.D. Beaulieu, M., & Pickman, S. (1985,
Jul.). An evaluation of use force-- Part II: Non-deadly force. The Program Evaluation
Section, Orlando Police Department. |
| [326] |
Hust, Gerald. (1994). Taking Down Communications. Thesis.
Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama: School of Advanced Airpower Studies. |
| [327] |
Ingram, J.T. (1942, Dec.). Dermatitis from exposure to
tear gas. The British Journal of Dermatology, 54. |
| [328] |
Inside the Army. (1995, 31 Jul.). Draft Concept for
Non-Lethal Capabilities in Army Operations, 18-19. |
| [329] |
Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis. (1996, May.).
Nonlethal Weapons: Emerging Requirements for Security Strategy. Cambridge, Massachusetts. |
| [330] |
Institute for Law and Justice. (1995, Jan.). Law
Enforcement Options. Newsletter on Less-Than-Lethal Technology Development, 1, (1) 1-8. |
| [331] |
International Association of Chiefs of Police.
(1970-1971). Police Center Weapons Report Series. Washington, District of Columbia. |
| [332] |
International Association of Chiefs of Police. (1970).
Police Chemical Munitions Handbook. Riot Control Agent Information Series No. 03-1.
Washington, District of Columbia. |
| [333] |
International Association of Chiefs of Police. (1970).
Tactical Use of Riot Agents. Riot Control Agent Information Series No. 04-1. Washington,
District of Columbia. |
| [334] |
International Association of Chiefs of Police. (1970).
Aerosol Irritant Projectors: A National Survey. Gaithersburg, Maryland. See also The
Police Chief. (1970, Jan.). |
| [335] |
International Association of Chiefs of Police,
Professional Standards Division. (1969). The Evaluation of CS Aerosols as a Riot-Control
Agent in Man. Washington, District of Columbia. Originally Issued in April 1960 by U.S.
Army Chemical Corps Research and Development Command, Chemical Warfare Laboratories. |
| [336] |
International Association of Chiefs of Police, Police
Weapons Center. (1968). Selected Military Reports on CS Riot Control Agents. Gaithersburg,
Maryland. |
| [337] |
International Association of Chiefs of Police,
Professional Standards Division. (1967). Characteristics of Riot Control Agent CS.
Washington, District of Columbia. |
| [338] |
International Defense Review. (1995, Nov.). More Less-Than
Lethal Weaponry for US, 28, 14. |
| [339] |
International Defense Review. (1994, Jul.). Less Than
Lethal, 27, (7) 29. |
| [340] |
Isenberg, David. (1996, Spr.). Forum: Nonlethal Weapons.
Issues in Science and Technology, 12, (3) 15-16. |
| [341] |
Jackson, L. (1989). The effect of Tennessee vs. Garner on
the use of deadly force by non-sworn private security personnel. Millstadt, Illinois: PPCT
Research Publications. |
| [342] |
Jamieson, J.P., Hull, R. & Battershill, P. (1990,
Jul.). Recommendations of the Committee on the Use of Less Than Lethal Force by Police
Officers in British Columbia. British Columbia Police Commission. |
| [343] |
Janes Infantry Weapons. (1989). Ring Airfoil Civil
Disturbance Control System, 495. |
| [344] |
JAYCOR. (1994, 19 Sep.). Policy Study: Non-Lethal
Technologies. Washington, District of Columbia. |
| [345] |
Jolley, H.W. & Carpenter, W.L. (1968, Feb.). Tear gas
dermatitis. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 203. |
| [346] |
Jones, Anita. (1995, 4 Dec.). ARPA Has Mission. Defense
News, 26. Letters to the Editor. |
| [347] |
Jones, G.R.N. (1971, Jun.). CS in the balance. New
Scientist and Science Journal, 203. |
| [348] |
Journal of Electronic Defense. (1993, Aug.). The Sound of
Waco, 16, 42. Using sound as a nonlethal weapon. |
| [349] |
Kalman, S.M. (1970, 28 May.). Drugs as Weapons. Seminar
paper, Department of Bio-chemistry, U.C. Berkeley. |
| [350] |
Kerby, M. (1988). Analysis of impact weapon power and
energy duration of batons. Millstadt, Illinois: PPCT Research Publications. |
| [351] |
Kiernan, Vincent. (1994, 19 Nov.). 'Ban Cruel Laser
Weapons' Says Red Cross. New Scientist, 144, 11. |
| [352] |
Kiernan, Vincent. (1994, Sep.). Lasers seen as an aid to
law enforcement. Laser Focus World, 30, (9) 49-50. |
| [353] |
Kiernan, Vincent. (1993, 11 Dec.). War over weapons that
can't kill. New Scientist, 140, (1903) 14-16. |
| [354] |
Klaaren, USAF. Maj. Jonathan W. & Mitchell, USAF. Maj.
Ronald S. (1995, Spe.). Nonlethal Technology and Airpower: A Winning Combination for
Strategic Paralysis. Airpower Journal, 9, (SE) 42-51. Excerpt from a 1993 Air Command and
Staff College research project authored by Chingono, Maj. Biltim, et al. |
| [355] |
Knoth, Arthur. (1995, Oct.). Laserpainting the
battlefield. International Defense Review, 79. |
| [356] |
Knoth, Arthur. (1994, Jul.). Disabling Technologies: A
Critical Assessment. International Defense Review, 33-39. |
| [357] |
Kornblum, Ronald N. & Reddy, Sara K. (1991). Effects
of the Taser in Fatalities Involving Police Confrontation. Journal of Forensic Sciences,
36, (2) 434. |
| [358] |
Koscove, Eric M. (1985, Dec.). The Taser Weapon: A New
Emergency Medical Problem. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 14, 112. |
| [359] |
Kunze, Douglas R. (1995, May.-Jun.). Denial Systems
Deflect Terrorists from Mischief. National Defense, 55-56. |
| [360] |
Lancet (North American Edition). (1994, 17 Dec.). Weapons
Intended to Blind, 344, 1649-1650. |
| [361] |
Langreth, Robert. (1994, Oct.). Soft Kill. Popular
Science, 245, (4) 66-69. |
| [362] |
Laser Focus World. (1996, Jun.). Laser Industry Report:
Blinding Laser Weapons Ban in Question?, 32, (6) 67. |
| [363] |
Laser Focus World. (1993, Sep.). Washington Report: Lets
Debate Laser Weapons, 29, (9) 65. |
| [364] |
Law Enforcement News. (1996, 31 Mar.). Civil liberties
group wants FDA-style regulations-and more- for OC spray, 22, (442) 1, 6. |
| [365] |
Law Enforcement News. (1996, 31 Mar.). Philly reports no
problem with OC, 22, (442) 6. |
| [366] |
Law Enforcement News. (1996, 31 Jan.). The eyes have
it...OC spray is NYC cops' weapon of choice, 22, (438). |
| [367] |
Law Enforcement Technology (1995, Nov.). Surveillance and
Weapons Detection, 5. |
| [368] |
Law Enforcement Technology (1995, Nov.). Weapons and
Protective Systems, 10. |
| [369] |
Lawson, Chris. (1995, 17 Apr.). Words from a rising star.
Navy Times, 16. Marine Corps Edition. |
| [370] |
Leakey, Robert J. (1968). Utilization of Chemical Agents
and Their Application to Civil Disturbances. Thesis. Washington State University. |
| [371] |
Levine, Robert A. & Stahl, Charles J. (1968, Apr.).
Eye Injury Caused by Tear-Gas Weapons. American Journal of Ophthalamology, 65, 497. |
| [372] |
Lewer, Nick. (1995). Non-Lethal Weapons. Medicine and War,
11, (2) 78. |
| [373] |
Libby, Hildi S. (1996, 6-7 Mar.). Coordinated Army Non
Lethal Program Overview. In American Defense Preparedness Association. Non-Lethal Defense
II Conference: Proceedings & Updated Attendee Roster. Alexander, Chair. John B. The
Ritz-Carlton Hotel, Tysons Corner, McLean, Virginia. |
| [374] |
Linder, USA. Maj. Jim. (1995). Nonlethal Weapons: Direct
Employment Against Non-Combatants in MOOTW. Unpublished Research Paper. Newport, Rhode
Island: US Naval War College. |
| [375] |
Livingston, Neil C. (1995, 1 Sep.). Dazzling Achievements.
Sea Power, 38, (9) 43. |
| [376] |
Lorenz, F.M. (1996, Aut.). Non-Lethal Force: The Slippery
Slope to War? Parameters, 26, (3) 52-62. |
| [377] |
Lorenz, Col. F.M. (1995, Nov.-Dec.). Forging Rules of
Engagement: Lessons Learned in Operation United Shield. Military Review, 75, (6) 17-25. |
| [378] |
Lorenz, Col. Frederick M. (1995, Sep.). "Less-Lethal" Force in Operation United Shield. Marine Corps Gazette, 79, (9)
68-76. |
| [379] |
Los Angeles Times. (1994, 20 Dec.). Not So Deadly Weapons,
A4. |
| [380] |
Los Angeles Times. (1995, 13 Oct.). Pentagon Cancels
Controversial Laser, A16. |
| [381] |
Lynch, Gregory R. (1995). The Role of Non-Lethal Weapons
in "Special Wars." Thesis. Monterey, California: Naval Post Graduate School. |
| [382] |
Maclean's. (1995, 6 Mar.). Sticky 'Em Up, 108, 11. Marines
use sticky foam in Somalia |
| [383] |
Macleod, Ian F., Villarreal, J.E. & Seevers, M.H.
(1968, Jun.). Report on Mark IV Chemical Mace. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan
Medical School. |
| [384] |
Madden, J.F. (1951, Jan.). Cutaneous hypersensitivity to
tear gas (CN), a case report. The American Medical Association Archives of Dermatology and
Syhpilology, 63. |
| [385] |
Mahan, Jim. (1996, 6-7 Mar.). Prison Requirements. In
American Defense Preparedness Association. Non-Lethal Defense II Conference: Proceedings & Updated Attendee Roster. Alexander, Chair. John B. The Ritz-Carlton Hotel, Tysons
Corner, McLean, Virginia. |
| [386] |
Manley, Harriot. (1993, Mar.). Guide to Self-Defense
Devices. Good Housekeeping, 27, 28-30. |
| [387] |
Mar, Roland K. (1986, Sep.). Bang-Less Tank Killer. U.S.
Naval Institute Proceedings, 112, (19) 112-113. |
| [388] |
Marconi, Andrew. (1974, Dec.). What's New on the Beat.
Mechanix Illustrated. |
| [389] |
Marine Corps Combat Development Command (MCCDC). (1996,
Nov.). Joint Concept for Nonlethal Weapons. Draft. Quantico, Virginia. |
| [390] |
Marine Corps Gazette. (1996, Jun.). Lab to Hold Nonlethals
Experiment, 80, (6) 6. |
| [391] |
Marine Corps Gazette. (1996, May.). Corps Leads Nonlethal
Weapons Program, 80, (5) 6. |
| [392] |
Marine Corps Systems Command (1996). NonLethal Weapons
Program. Briefing Slides & Draft Memorandum. Quantico, Virginia. |
| [393] |
Margolis, R.J. (1974, 8 Dec.). Stun guns, bean bags and
dumdums. Washington Post. |
| [394] |
Martin, USN. Capt. M.D. (1991, 29 May). Non-Lethal
Weapons. Policy Planning Paper. Office of the Under-Secretary of Defense (Policy). |
| [395] |
Matthews, William. (1994, 11 Apr.). Crimebusters! Cops put
defense technology to work. Air Force Times, 31. |
| [396] |
Mayer, J. (1966). Crop destruction in Vietnam. Science,
152. |
| [397] |
MBA Associates. (1970, 24 Jul.). Technical Memorandum:
Non-Lethal Projectile. MB-TM-70 12-2. San Ramon, California. |
| [398] |
MCCDC, Concepts Division, Nonlethal Coordination Cell.
(1996). Marine Corps Systems Command: Nonlethal Weapons Program. Brief. Quantico,
Virginia. |
| [399] |
McConnell, A.F. (1970). Mission: Ranch Hand. Air
University Review, 21. |
| [400] |
McGrew, Dan. (1996, 22 Apr.). The Name of the Game is
Killing. Navy Times, 46, (29) 54. Marine Corps Edition. |
| [401] |
Meadows, Sandra I. (1996, Jul.-Aug.). Warfighters Want
Weapons That Disable But Don't Kill. National Defense, 81, (519) 24. |
| [402] |
Meadows, Sandra I. & Williams, Robert H. (1995,
May.-Jun.). Movable Systems Shepherded Course of Defense Security. National Defense, 52. |
| [403] |
Mechanical Engineering. (1994, Apr.). Lawbreakers Beware
the Web of Justice, 116, (4) 86. |
| [404] |
Memorandum of Agreement between the United States Army and
United States Marine Corps for Non-Lethal Weapons Development, Test & Evaluation and
Fielding. (1996). |
| [405] |
Merchant, Julie. (1994, Jul.). Threat Weapons and Weapons
Technologies: Implications for Army SOF. Special Warfare, 7, 32-39. |
| [406] |
Meselson, M. (1971, Mar.). Tear gas in Vietnam and the
return of poison gas. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 27. |
| [407] |
Meyer-Arendt, Jurgen R. (1968, Mar.). Efficiency and
Limitations of Lasers as Weapons. American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American
Academy of Optometry, 188-191. |
| [408] |
Meyer, Sgt. Greg. (1992, Aug.). Nonlethal Weapons vs.
Conventional Police Tactics: Assessing Injuries and Liabilities. The Police Chief, 59, (8)
10-17. |
| [409] |
Meyer, Greg. (1991). Nonlethal Weapons versus Conventional
Police Tactics. Thesis. Los Angeles, California: California State University, Los Angeles. |
| [410] |
Michigan State University, Vietnam Advisory Group (Saigon,
Vietnam). (1959). Tear Gas Training Manual. Reports and Documents, Ser. 2, No. 39. Saigon,
East Lansing: Michigan State University. |
| [411] |
Miller, Craig. (1994, 1 Jul.). Poway Man Dies After Hit
With Spray. San Diego Times Advocate, B1. |
| [412] |
Miller, W.L. (1964, Nov.-Dec.). Smoke'em out! Ordnance,
64. |
| [413] |
Miller, W.L. (1964, Jul.). Chemicals vs. guerrillas.
Marine Corps Gazette, 48. |
| [414] |
Mohr, USAF. Capt. George C., et al. (1965, Sep.). Effects
of Low Frequency and Infrasonic Noise on Man. Aerospace Medicine, 36, (9) 817-824. |
| [415] |
Morehouse, Maj. David A. (1992). A New Strategic Era: A
Case for Nonlethal Weapons. Thesis. Fort Leavenworth, Kansas: U.S. Army Command and
General Staff College. |
| [416] |
Morgan, J.P. (1992, Aug.). Oleoresin Capsicum. The Police
Chief, 59, 22-23. |
| [417] |
Morris, Chris & Janet. (1995, 13 Nov.). End Battle
Over Nonlethals: Congress Must Heed Call for Needed Weapons. Defense News, 40. |
| [418] |
Morris, Chris & Janet, & Baines, Thomas. (1995,
Spring). Weapons of Mass Protection: Nonlethality, Information Warfare, and Airpower in
the Age of Chaos. Airpower Journal, 9, (1) 15-29. |
| [419] |
Morris, Janet & Morris, Chris. (1990, 1994).
Nonlethality: A Global Strategy. West Hyannis Port, Massachusetts: Morris & Morris. |
| [420] |
Morris, Chris & Morris, Janet. (1994). Nonlethality:
An Overview. West Hyannis Port, Massachusetts: Morris & Morris. |
| [421] |
Morris, Chris & Morris, Janet. (1993). Nonlethality
and Psyops. West Hyannis Port, Massachusetts: Morris & Morris. |
| [422] |
Morris, Janet & Morris, Chris. (1992). Creating an
Office of Nonlethality: A New Paradigm for a New Era. Washington, District of Columbia: US
Global Strategy Council. |
| [423] |
Morris, Janet., Krivorotov, Victor & Morris, Chris.
(1992). The Age of Chaos. West Hyannis Port, Massachusetts: Morris & Morris. |
| [424] |
Morris, Janet & Morris, Chris. (1991). Nonlethality:
Development of a National Policy and Employing Nonlethal Means in a New Strategic Era.
Washington, District of Columbia: US Global Strategy Council. |
| [425] |
Morris, Janet. (1991, Sep.). Enter Nonlethal Weaponry.
IEEE Spectrum, 28, (9) 58. |
| [426] |
Morris, Janet & Morris, Chris. (1990). Toward a
Nonlethal Strategy. West Hyannis Port, Massachusetts: Morris & Morris. |
| [427] |
Morrison, David C. (1995). More-Than-Lethal Weapons.
National Journal, 27, (29) 1919. |
| [428] |
Morrison, David C. (1994, Oct.). Crime-Fighting 2001.
Government Executive, 26, 42-44. |
| [429] |
Morrison, David C. (1994, 16 Apr.). Robocops. National
Journal, 26, (16) 889-893. |
| [430] |
Morrison, David. (1992, 7 Nov.). War Without Death?
National Journal, 24, (45) 2589. |
| [431] |
Morrison, David C. (1992, 6 Jun.). Alternatives to
Bashing. National Journal, 24, (23) 1358-1360. |
| [432] |
Morrison, David C. (1992, 28 Mar.). Bang! Bang! You've
been inhibited. National Journal, 24, (13) 758-759. |
| [433] |
Morrison, David. (1989, May.). Tactical Laser Weapons.
Lasers and Optics. |
| [434] |
Morrison, David C. (1987, 14 Mar.). Snow Jobs (emulsifying
agents). National Journal, 19, (11) 651. |
| [435] |
Morrison, David C. (1987, 4 Mar.). When Eyes Become the
Targets. National Journal, 19, (14) 822-823. |
| [436] |
Morrison, David C. (1985, May.). Laser Weapons Come Down
to Earth; Their Targets Electronic and Human Eyes. High Technology, 5, 69-70. |
| [437] |
Munro, N. & Opall, B. (1992, 19-25 Oct.). Military
studies unusual arsenal. Defense News, 3. |
| [438] |
Munro, N. (1990, 5 Mar.). Army tests hand-held laser
rifles. Defense News. |
| [439] |
National Institute of Justice. (1995, Sep.). New
Technologies Demonstrated for Law Enforcement. Technology Beat, 1-5. |
| [440] |
National Institute of Justice, Office of Science and
Technology. (1995, 18 Sep.). Matrix of Law Enforcement Technology Requirements, Studies,
Evaluations & Standards (Draft). |
| [441] |
National Institute of Justice. (1995, 14 Jun.). CJ
Management & Training Digest, 1 (11) 1-4. Focuses on Nonlethal Weapons. |
| [442] |
National Institute of Justice. (1995, Jan.). NIJ Awards in
Fiscal Year 1994. NCJ 152109. Research in Brief. Washington, District of Columbia: U.S.
Government Printing Office, 9, 11-13. |
| [443] |
National Institute of Justice. (1985, Sep.). Hand-Held
Aerosol Tear Gas Weapons. Technology Assessment Program, NIJ Standard 0110.00. Washington,
District of Columbia: U.S. Government Printing Office. |
| [444] |
National Institute of Justice. (1985, Sep.).
Barrier-Penetrating Tear Gas Munitions. Technology Assessment Program, NIJ Standard
0111.00. Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Government Printing Office. |
| [445] |
Navy Times (1996, 5 Aug.). Nonlethals get official DoD
nod. Marine Corps Edition., 24. |
| [446] |
Navy Times. (1995, 9 Oct.). Special Ops pulls blind laser.
Marine Corps Edition., 32. |
| [447] |
Navy Times. (1995, 27 Feb.). Corps hopes a little goo goes
a long way there. Marine Corps Edition., 3. |
| [448] |
Neild, R. & Robison, Perry J. (1970, 15 Feb.). Tear
gas: a blunder. The Sunday Times. |
| [449] |
Neven, Thomas E. (1993, Dec.). Nonlethal Weapons:
Expanding Our Options. Marine Corps Gazette, 77, (12) 61-62. |
| [450] |
New Scientist. (1973, 29 Mar.). Anti-crowd weapons work by
causing fits 57, (839) 726. |
| [451] |
New Scientist. (1973, 20 Sep). 'Squawk box' technology.
59, (864) 667. |
| [452] |
New Scientist. (1973, 20 Sep). Army tests new riot weapon.
59, (864) 684. |
| [453] |
Nicholson, Thomas Gerald. (1969). The Use of Chemical Mace
by Army Military Policemen. Staff Study ASDIRS, 3079. Fort Leavenworth, Kansas: U.S. Army
Command and General Staff College. |
| [454] |
Nollinger, Mark. (1995, Feb.). Surrender or We'll Slime
You. Wired, 3, 90. |
| [455] |
Noorani, A.G. (1995). Landmines and Blinding Laser
Weapons. Economic and Political Weekly, 30, (48). |
| [456] |
O'Connell, USAF. Capt. Edward P. & Dillaplain, USAF.
1stLt. John. (1994, Win.). Nonlethal Concepts: Implications for Air Force Intelligence.
Airpower Journal, 7, (4) 26-33. |
| [457] |
Office of Assistant Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs).
(1995, 1 Sep.). DOD Announces Policy on Blinding Lasers. Washington, District of Columbia. |
| [458] |
Official Journal of the European Communities: Information
and Notices. (1995). Blinding Laser Weapons, 38, (340) 39. |
| [459] |
Olmstead, Bob. (1975, 14 Sep.). For Crowd Control: A
Stunning New Weapon. Chicago Sunday Sun-Times. |
| [460] |
Olson, Donald N. (1972, Aug.). A Kinetically Non-Hazardous
Ring Airfoil Projectile for Delivering Riot Control Agent. EATM 2200-6. Edgewood Arsenal,
Maryland: U.S. Army Munitions Command. |
| [461] |
O'Malley, MPC. Maj. Dennis J. (1974, Win.).
'Less-Than-Lethal Firepower: A Possible Solution. MPLEJ, 16-17. |
| [462] |
Opall, Barbara. (1990, 5 Nov.). Labs Rush Nonlethal Arms
for Mideast Deployment. Defense News, 1. |
| [463] |
Opall, Barbara. (1992, 17 Feb.). Pentagon Forges Strategy
on Non-Lethal Warfare. Defense News, 1, 50. |
| [464] |
Opall, Barbara. (1992, 2 Mar.). Pentagon Units Jostle Over
Non-Lethal Initiative. Defense News, 6. |
| [465] |
Opall, Barbara. (1994, 28 Mar.-3 Apr.). DoD to boost
nonlethal options. Defense News, 46. |
| [466] |
Optics and Photonics News. (1995). Scatterings: Ethics of
Laser Weapons Questioned, 6, (8), 6. |
| [467] |
Ordog, Gary J., Wasserberger, Jonathan & Schater,
Theodore., et al. (1987). Electronic Gun (Taser©) Injuries. Annals of Emergency Medicine,
16, 73-78. |
| [468] |
Orion International Technologies, Inc. (1989). Precision
Guided Weapons Countermeasures Test and Evaluation Directorate (OTD) Pamphlet 1-89. |
| [469] |
Page, J.A. (1969). Of 'Mace' and men: tort law as a means
of controlling domestic chemical warfare. The Georgetown Law Review. |
| [470] |
Panique, Jr. Chester H. (1995, May.). What Methods will
California Use to Identify and Inform Technology Developers of Their Needs by the Year
2004? Command College Graduate Project, Class 20, Center for Leadership Institute. |
| [471] |
Parks, W. Hays. (1988, Nov.). Memorandum of Law: The Use
of Lasers as Antipersonnel Weapons, The Army Lawyer, 3. |
| [472] |
Parlor, USMCR. Michael B. (1991, 29 May.). Non-Lethal
Weapons: A Policy Planning Paper. |
| [473] |
Patel, Tara. (1995, 23 Sep.). US Fights Ban on Laser
Warfare. New Scientist, 147, 6. |
| [474] |
Peak, Ken. (1990, Feb.). The Quest for Alternatives to
Lethal Force: A Heuristic View. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 6, (1) 8-22. |
| [475] |
Pengelley, Rupert. (1995, Jul.). Eyewash No Defense:
Lasers Still Cause Concern. International Defense Review, 28, (7) 1. |
| [476] |
Pengelley, Rupert. (1994, Apr.). Wanted: a watch on
non-lethal weapons. International Defense Review, 27, (4) 1. |
| [477] |
Penneys, N.S. (1971, Jan.-Feb.). Contact dermatitis due to
chloroacetophenone. Federation Proceedings, 30. |
| [478] |
Penneys, N.S. et al. (1969, Aug.). Contact dermatitis due
to o-chloroacetophenone and chemical mace. The New England Journal of Medicine, 281. |
| [479] |
Peters, D.W.A. (1969, Oct.). Delivery of Anti-Riot Agents,
Final Report No. 69-17. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: U.S. Army Limited War
Laboratory. |
| [480] |
Pexton, Patrick. (1995, 17 Jul.). Shoot-- but not to kill:
Major U.S. study pushes use of nonlethal weapons. Navy Times, 32. Marine Corps Edition. |
| [481] |
Pilant, Lois. (1996, Mar.). Innovative Weaponry. The
Police Chief, 63, (3) 36-42. |
| [482] |
Pilant, Lois. (1993, May.). Spotlight on... Selecting
Nonlethal Weapons. The Police Chief, 60, (5) 45-55. |
| [483] |
Pine, A. (1993, 19 Dec.). Pentagon pushing nonlethal
weapons. The Virginian-Pilot and the Ledger-Star, A1. First published in Los Angeles Times
on 18 Dec. |
| [484] |
The Police Chief. (1988, Aug.). Models for Management:
Non-Lethal Electronic Restraint Weapons, 55, 79-80. |
| [485] |
The Police Chief. (1987, Sep.). A Less-Than-Lethal
Alternative (Handler 12 Grip Action Baton). 54, 79. |
| [486] |
Pope, Canadian Forces. Maj. Stephen R. (1995, Jun.).
Nonlethality and Peace Operations. Thesis. Fort Leavenworth, Kansas: U.S. Army Command and
General Staff College. |
| [487] |
Porton. (1959, declassified 1968, Jun.). Agents for riot
control: the selection of T. 792 (o-chlorobenzal malononitrile) as a candidate agent to
replace CN. Porton Tech. Paper 651. |
| [488] |
Porton. (1959, declassified 1968, Jun.). A study of the
toxicity of CS. Porton Tech. Paper 672. |
| [489] |
Potok, Mark. (1996, 20 May.). Wanted: Weapons that don't
kill. USA Today, p. A3. |
| [490] |
Proceedings. (1966). Navy defends non-lethal war gas, 92. |
| [491] |
Punte, C.L. & Owens, E.J. 1960, Feb.). The
physiological effectiveness of CS in man with reference to aerosol particle size. U.S.
Army Chemical Warfare Laboratories Tech. Memo. CWL-TM-24-28. |
| [492] |
Purser, B.J. (n.d.). CR Decontamination Trial. Program No.
23/71. Field Trial Report No. 27. Porton Down, Salsbury Wilts, England: Chemical Defense
Establishment. |
| [493] |
Queen and Stander. (1941, Nov.). Allergic dermatitis
following exposure to tear gas (chloracetophenone, CN). The Journal of the American
Medical Association, 117. |
| [494] |
Quimby, Freeman H. (1968, Jan.). The State of Technology
in Nonlethal Guns. Washington, District of Columbia: Legislative Reference Service. |
| [495] |
Rapaport, Gary S. (1994, Feb.). Use of Deadly Force
Against Suspects with Aerosol Weapons: Some Preliminary Guidelines. Chief's Council. The
Police Chief, 10. |
| [496] |
Reinnagel, Richard E. (1968). Considerations in the Use of
Irritants in Law Enforcement. Buffalo, New York: Weapons Research Department, Cornell
Aeronautical Laboratory, Inc. |
| [497] |
Rengstorff, R.H. (1969, Mar.). The effects of the riot
control agent CS on visual activity. Military Medicine, 134. |
| [498] |
Richardson, Odie B. (1969). CS Munitions: Dispenser and
Bagged Riot Control Agent, Helicopter, CS2, XM28: Final Report. San Francisco, California:
Department of the Army, Army Concept Team in Vietnam. Project Number: ACG-83-86.7/61. |
| [499] |
Ricks, T.E. (1993, 5 Jan.). A kinder, gentler war may be
in order. Globe and Mail, 1. Toronto, Canada. |
| [500] |
Ricks, T.E. (1993, 4 Jan.). Nonlethal arms: new class of
weapons could incapacitate foe yet limit casualties. Wall Street Journal, 1. |
| [501] |
Ritsche, Daniel F. (1993). "Mace" and Tear Gas
Weapons. Wisconsin Briefs from the Legislative Reference Bureau, Brief 93-3. Madison,
Wisconsin: Legislative Reference Bureau. |
| [502] |
Rivetti, Dominick J. (1987). What is the Future of Less
Than Lethal Weapons in Law Enforcement? Sacramento, California: State of California, Peace
Officer Standards and Training. |
| [503] |
Roberts, Clifford. (1966). Nonlethal Agents in Limited
War. Thesis. Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama: Air Command and Staff College. |
| [504] |
Rodwin, Robert. (1973, 27 Sep.). How dangerous is the
Army's squawk box? New Scientist, 59, (865) 730. |
| [505] |
Roos, John G. (1996, Jul.). Nowhere to Hide: High-Tech
Counter-Sniper Systems Unmask Urban Terrorists. Armed Forces Journal International, 123,
(12) 18. |
| [506] |
Roos, John G. (1987, Dec.). Protecting Our Vitals: A
Sticky Response to Terrorists. Armed Forces Journal International, 124 (5) 32. |
| [507] |
Rose, S. & Smith, R. (1969, Sep.). CS- a case for
concern. The New Scientist. |
| [508] |
Rosenberg, Barbara Hatch. (1994, Sep.-Oct.). "Non-lethal" weapons may violate treaties. The Bulletin of the Atomic
Scientists, 50, (5) 44-45. |
| [509] |
Rosenberg, Eric. (1995, 6 Mar.). Pentagon Memo Seeks To
Better Explain Non-Lethal Weaponry. Defense Week, 16, 5. |
| [510] |
Rosenhead, J. & Smith, P.J. (1971, 12 Aug.). Ulster
Riot Control: A Warning. New Scientist, 374. |
| [511] |
Rosenhead, Jonathan. (1976, 16 Dec.). A new look at less
'less lethal' weapons. New Scientist, 672-674. |
| [512] |
Rothberg, S. (1970, Jul.). Skin sensitization potential of
the riot control agents BBC, DM, CN and CS on guinea pigs. Military Medicine. Also
published as Edgewood Arsenal Technical Report 4219. |
| [513] |
Rothstein, Linda. (1994, Mar.-Apr.). The "soft-kill" solution. Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, 50, (2) 4-6. |
| [514] |
Rothstein, Linda. (1992, Jun.). More road blocks to
chemical treaty? Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, 48, 7. |
| [515] |
Runions, Bradley. (1996, Jan.-Feb.). Less-Lethal Weapons
in Peace Operations: Broadening the Spectrum of Response. Peacekeeping and International
Relations, 25, (1) 8-10. |
| [516] |
Sagalyn, Arnold & Coates, Joseph F. (1967, 17 Sep.).
Wanted: Weapons That Do Not Kill. New York Times Magazine. |
| [517] |
Samuels, D.W., Egner, D.O. & Campbell, D. (1969). Riot
Control: Analysis and Catalog, Final Report, Report No. 69-14. Aberdeen Proving Ground:
U.S. Army Land Warfare Laboratory, Research Analysis Branch. |
| [518] |
Sapolsky, Harvey M. (1995, Mar.). Non-Lethal Warfare
Technologies: Opportunities and Problems. Defense and Arms Control Studies Program Working
Paper. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Center for International Studies, Massachusetts Institute
of Technology. |
| [519] |
The San Diego Union-Tribune. (1995, 13 Oct.). Army told to
scrap laser that can blind. |
| [520] |
The San Diego Union-Tribune. (1995, 21 Sep.). Blinding
laser shelved by U.S. Special Operations, A-12. |
| [521] |
Sapolsky, Harvey M. & Weiner, Sharon K. (1994, Oct.).
War Without Casualties. Across the Board, 31, (9) 39-42. |
| [522] |
Saunders, Carol Silverman. (1995, Feb.). Future Firearms.
OMNI, 17, (5) 31. |
| [523] |
Savitz, D. (1966, Mar.). Gas and guerrillas-- A word of
caution. The New Republic. |
| [524] |
Scannell, Dr. Edward P. (1994, Dec.). Nonlethal
Technologies Overview. Presentation Slides for Sixth Annual SO/LIC Symposium and
Exhibition, Washington, DC. Dec. 14-16, 1994. US Army Research Laboratory, Weapons
Technology Directorate. Adelphi, Maryland. |
| [525] |
Schmidt, Donald et al. (1994, 3 Mar.). Water-based
Non-stick Hydrophobic Coatings. Nature, 368, (6466), 39. |
| [526] |
Schmitt, Eric. (1995, 15 Feb.). Now, to the Shores of
Somalia With Beanbag Guns and Goo. The New York Times International, A10. |
| [527] |
Scott, R. (1994). Offboard Countermeasures Technology Part
1: Soft Kill Payloads Get Smarter. Naval Forces, 15, (4) 16. |
| [528] |
Scott, William B. (1995, 16 Oct.). Panel's report backs
nonlethal weapons. Aviation Week & Space Technology, 143, (16) 50-51. |
| [529] |
Security Planning Corporation. (1972, Mar.). Non-Lethal
Weapons for Law Enforcement: Research Needs and Priorities. A Report to National Science
Foundation, PB 209 635. Washington, District of Columbia. |
| [530] |
Senior Advisory Group for Low-Collateral, Less-Than-Lethal
Weapons. (1994, May.). Columbus, Ohio: RACIC Battelle Memorial Institute. |
| [531] |
Serwer, Andrew E. (1994, 4 Apr.). Crime Stoppers Make a
Killing. Fortune, 129, (7) 109-111. |
| [532] |
Shallice, T. (1973). The Ulster depth interrogation
techniques and their relation to sensory deprivation research. Cognition, 1, 385-405. |
| [533] |
Shank, Ellsworth B. et al. (1974, Jun.). A Comparison of
Various Less Lethal Projectiles. Technical Report No. 74-79. Aberdeen Proving Ground,
Maryland: US Army Land Warfare Laboratory. |
| [534] |
Shannon, James O. (1996, 10 May.). A Report of the
Nonlethal (NLW) Coordination Project. Conducted by Los Alamos National Laboratory at the
United States Atlantic Command under the auspices of the Joint Program Office for Special
Technology Countermeasures. |
| [535] |
Shorto, Russel. (1995, Mar.). Armageddon: killing them
softly. Gentlemen's Quarterly, 65, 152. |
| [536] |
Silverstone, A. (1970, Dec.). Lethal use of non-lethal
weapons. Paper submitted at the International Meeting of Scientists on Chemical Warfare in
Vietnam, Orsay. |
| [537] |
Smith, Senator Bob. (1996, Jun.). Appropriate Response:
Nontraditional Missions Demand Less-Than-Lethal Weapons. Armed Forces Journal
International, 133, (11), 55. |
| [538] |
Smith & Wesson Chemical Company. (1965). Police Riot
Control Training Manual. Rock Creek, Ohio. |
| [539] |
Sprang, W.O. (1965, Nov.). Nonlethal Incapacitating
Weapon: Extensible Billy Club. Technical Paper No. RAC-TP-194 submitted to Advanced
Research Projects Agency, Washington D.C. McLean Virginia: Research Analysis Report. |
| [540] |
Stanton, USA. LtCol. Martin N. (1996, Nov.). Nonlethal
Weapons: Can of Worms. U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings, 122, (11) 58-60. |
| [541] |
Stanton, USA. LtCol. Martin N. (1996, Jan.). What Price
Sticky Foam? U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings, 122, (1) 58-60. Reprinted in (1996, Aut.)
Parameters, 26, (3) 63-68. |
| [542] |
Starr, Barbara. (1996, 6 Mar.). USA defines policy on
non-lethal weapons. Jane's Defence Weekly. |
| [543] |
Starr, Barbara. (1994, 31 Oct.). USA tries to make war
less lethal. Jane's Defence Weekly, 10. |
| [544] |
Starr, Barbara. (1994, Jul.). Pentagon Maps Non-Lethal
Options. International Defense Review, 27, (7) 30, 32. |
| [545] |
Starr, Barbara. (1994, 30 Apr.). USA studies non-lethal
weapon priorities. Jane's Defence Weekly, 14. |
| [546] |
Starr, Barbara. (1993, Apr.). Non-lethal weapon puzzle for
US Army. International Defense Review, 26, (4) 319-320. |
| [547] |
Steadman, Nick. (1996, May.). Nonlethal Weaponry.
S.W.A.T., 60. |
| [548] |
Steele, David. (1995, Mar.). Guns for Raids and Riot
Control. Gun World, 35, (8). |
| [549] |
Stefanye, David. (1971, 2 Nov.). Less Lethal Weapons for
the Civil Disturbance Control Mission. Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Army
Materiel Command. |
| [550] |
Stiner, Carl et al. (1994, May.). Report of the Senior
Working Group on Military Operations Other Than War (OOTW). Contract No. MDA972-93-C-0016.
Advanced Research Projects Agency. |
| [551] |
Stolfi, R.H. et al. (1973, Mar.). Gradient and Less Lethal
Devices in Control of Urban Violence. Report No. 1635. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland:
U.S. Ballistic Research Laboratories. |
| [552] |
Stratbucker, Robert A. (1989, 4 Aug.). Evaluation of the
Ultron II Electronic Stun Device. Unpublished. University of Nebraska Medical Center. |
| [553] |
Striker, G.E. et al. (1967, Jan.). A clinico-pathologic
study of the effects of riot control agents on monkeys: IV CS grenade. Edgewood Arsenal,
MD: Edgewood Arsenal Technical Report. 4071 AD 808732. |
| [554] |
Stuck, Monte. (1972). Future U.S. Use of Non-Lethal
Chemical Agents in Warfare. Staff Study. Norfolk, Virginia: Armed Forces Staff College. |
| [555] |
Sunday Telegraph Reporter. (1973, 6 Oct.). New riot gas
condemned (CR). |
| [556] |
Sweetman, Sherri. (1987, Mar.). Report on the Attorney
General's Conference on Less Than Lethal Weapons. National Institute of Justice.
Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Government Printing Office. |
| [557] |
Swett, Charles. (1995, Jan.). Nonlethal weapons section.
Review Essay: War and Anti-War. Special Warfare, 8, (1) 29. |
| [558] |
Swett, Charles F. (1994, 28 Nov.). Draft Non-Lethal
Weapons Policy. Briefing Slides. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense, Special
Operations/Low Intensity Conflict, Policy Planning. Washington, District of Columbia. |
| [559] |
Swett, Charles F. (1994, 21 Jul.). Draft Policy for
Non-Lethal Weapons. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense, Special Operations/Low
Intensity Conflict, Policy Planning. Washington, District of Columbia. |
| [560] |
Swett, Charles F. (1993, 9 Nov.). Strategic Assessment:
Non-Lethal Weapons. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense, Special Operations and
Low-Intensity Conflict, Policy Planning. Washington, District of Columbia. Draft report. |
| [561] |
Tactical Technologies. (1995, 3 Feb.). Non-Lethal Weapons
Offer New SO/LIC Capabilities, 5. |
| [562] |
Tapscott, Mark & Atwal, Kay. (1993, Feb.). New weapons
that win without killing on DOD's horizon; policy strife in Pentagon may slow work on
devices that could give the president more options in a crisis. Defense Electronics, 25,
(2) 41-46. |
| [563] |
Tapscott, M. (1993, Apr.). The non-lethal weapons battle.
Defence, 37. |
| [564] |
Tapscott, Mark. (1993, Dec.). Reno Asks Aspin for
Non-Lethal, Other DOD Weapons to Fight Crime. Defense Electronics, 25, 8. |
| [565] |
Tatum, Chris. (1995, Mar.). Defensive Weapons Do's and
Don'ts. Security Management, 26-31. |
| [566] |
Technology Beat. (1995, Sep.). New Technologies
Demonstrated for Law Enforcement, 2-4. |
| [567] |
Technology Review. (1995, Jan.). Trends, 98, (1) 14. |
| [568] |
Tengroth, Bjorn M. (1993, Sep.). Laser Weapons Designed to
Produce Blindness. Editorial. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 116, (3) 370. |
| [569] |
Tennenbaum, Abraham N. & Moore, Angela M. (1993,
Sep.-Oct.). Non-Lethal Weapons: Alternatives to Deadly Force. The Futurist, 27, (5) 20-23. |
| [570] |
The, Liang. (1995, Aug.). Getting the Act Together:
Hardkill-Softkill Co-Ordination for Littoral Waters. International Defense Review, 28, (8)
54-56. |
| [571] |
Thein, B.K. et al. (1976, Jan.). Weapon Performance
Testing and Analysis: The Modi-Pac Round, the No. 4 Lead-Shot Round, and the Flying Baton.
Technical Memorandum 4-76. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: U.S. Army Human Engineering
Laboratory. |
| [572] |
Thein, B.K., Shank, E.B. & Wargovich, M.J. (1974,
May). Analysis of a Bean-Bag-Type Projectile as a Less Lethal Weapon. Draft Report.
Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland: U.S. Army Land Warfare Laboratory. |
| [573] |
Thomas, Bob & Means, Randy. (1990, Jul.). Objective
Reasonableness Standard for Use of Non Deadly Force Established. The Police Chief, 45. |
| [574] |
Thorpe, Terry. (1990, Mar.). Clearing the Way to
Distraction Devices. Law Enforcement Technology, 16. |
| [575] |
Tigner, Brooks. (1996, 29 Apr.). Alliance Study Urges
Nations to Collaborate on Weapons (non-lethals), 11, (17) 12. |
| [576] |
Tigner, Brooks. (1994, 11-17 Jul.). NATO Eyes Peacekeeping
Tools. Defense News, 9, 4. |
| [577] |
Tillman, A.C. (1994, Jan.). Weapons for the 21st century
soldier. International Defense Review, 27, (1) 37-38. |
| [578] |
Time. (1989, Jan.). Nonlethal bullets that kill
(rubber-clad metal balls used by Israelis to quell Palestinian uprising), 133, 33. |
| [579] |
Trebor Corporation International. (n.d.) Stun-Gun
Preliminary Terminal Effects Study. Dublin, California. |
| [580] |
Trostle, L.C. (1990). The force continuum: From lethal to
less-than-lethal force. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 6, (1) 23-36. |
| [581] |
Truong, Khong Q. (1985, Sep.). Evaluation of the MS
Disperser as a Dissemination Device for Thickened Liquid Chemical Agent Stimulant. CRDC-TC
84076. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: U.S. Army Armament, Munitions and Chemical
Command, Chemical Research and Development Center. |
| [582] |
USA Today. (1995, Apr.). New High-Tech Tools Aid Police,
123, 14-15. |
| [583] |
United States Army. (1996, Aug.). FM 311, Riot Control
Agents, Herbicide Operations. Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Government Printing
Office. |
| [584] |
United States Army. (1990, 12 Dec). FM 3-9, Military
Chemical Compounds and Their Properties. Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Government
Printing Office. |
| [585] |
United States Army. (1985, Nov.). FM 19-15, Civil
Disturbance. Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Government Printing Office. |
| [586] |
US Army ARDEC. (1995, 2 Jun.). Grenade Stun Nonlethal
Weapon XM84. Issue No. PSA-1359. Commerce Business Daily, 3. |
| [587] |
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (1982). Army Equipment Data
Sheets: Chemical Weapons and Munitions. Technical Manual; TM 43-0001-26-2. Washington,
District of Columbia: Headquarters, Department of the Army. |
| [588] |
U.S. Air Force Armament Laboratory. (1967). CBU-30/A
Incapacitating Munitions Systems. AFATL-TR-67-178. |
| [589] |
U.S. Air Force Armament Laboratory. (1966). Design and
Development of an Incapacitating Disseminator. ATL-TR-66-40. |
| [590] |
U.S. Air Force Tactical Air Command. (1969). ROC for
Non-Lethal Area Denial System. TAC-ROC-45-69. Langley Air Force Base, Virginia. |
| [591] |
U.S. Army Engineering Laboratory (HEL). (1981, 7-9 Dec. & 1982, 12-15 Jan.). An Acoustical Assessment of the Impulse Noise of Grenade
Simulators Exploding in Enclosures. Aberdeen, Maryland: Aberdeen Proving Grounds. |
| [592] |
U.S. Army Foreign Science and Technology Center. (1990).
Incapacitating Agents, European Communist Countries. AST-162OR-100-90. Charlottesville,
Maryland. |
| [593] |
U.S. Army Laboratory Command. (1988, Mar.). Warfighting
with Emerging Technologies: Report on the Tech Base War Games. Waterways Experiment
Station. |
| [594] |
U.S. Army Research, Development, and Engineering Center.
(1992, 23 Sep.). Low Collateral Damage Munitions (LCDM) Programs. Picatinny Arsenal, New
Jersey. |
| [595] |
U.S. Army Research Laboratory. (1993). Less-than-Lethal
Weapons Development for Law Enforcement. ARL-TR-51. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland. |
| [596] |
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC). (1992, 4
Sep.). Operations Concept for Disabling Measures. Pamphlet 525-XX, Draft. |
| [597] |
U.S. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Subcommittee on National Security Policy and Scientific Developments. (1970).
Chemical-biological warfare: U.S. policies and international effects report with an
appended study on the use of tear gas in war:...pursuant to House Resolution 143.
Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office. |
| [598] |
U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations.
Subcommittee on Oceans and International Environment. (1972, 26-27 Jul.). Prohibiting
military weather modification. 92nd. Cong., 2nd Sess. |
| [599] |
U.S. Department of the Army. (1969, 9 Apr.). Employment of
riot control agents, flame, smoke, antiplant agents, and personnel detectors in
counterguerrilla operations. Training Circular 3-16. |
| [600] |
U.S. Government Printing Office. An Act to Authorize the
Export-Import Bank of the United States to Provide Financing for the Export of Nonlethal
Defense Articles and Defense Services the Primary End Use of Which Will Be for Civilian
Purposes. (1995). Washington, District of Columbia. |
| [601] |
U.S. Special Operations Command & Advanced Research
Projects Agency. (1995, 29 Dec.). Survey of Limited Effects Weapons, Munitions, and
Devices. 2nd Edition. MacDill Air Force Base, Florida. |
| [602] |
U.S. News & World Report. (1992, 28 Sep.). A guide to
self-defense devices, 88. |
| [603] |
Vasishtha, Ph.D., Niraj & Bera, Cristin S. (1995, 10
Jul.). Marking and Incapacitating a Fleeing Target (MIFT) using Non-Lethal Encapsulated
Compounds, Volume I: Technical Proposal. Prepared for ARPA/ASTO, Southwest Research
Institute. |
| [604] |
Wade, Nicholas. (1972, 9 Jun.). Technology in Ulster:
Rubber Bullets Hit Home, Brainwashing Backfires. Science, 176, 1102-1106. |
| [605] |
Walker, Sam. (1994, 6 Sep.). 'Nonlethal' Weapons, James
Bond Style. The Christian Science Monitor, 12. |
| [606] |
Wall Street Journal. (1994, 2 Aug.). Nonlethal Weapons:
Freeze., or I'll Fire My Sticky-Goo Gun, 1. |
| [607] |
Wall Street Journal. (1993, 4 Jan.). New Class of Weapons
Could Incapacitate Foe Yet Limit Casualties, 1. |
| [608] |
Walsh, Don. (1985). The Ring Airfoil Grenade: A Miracle
Munition The Army Ignores. Gung-Ho/Special Weapons, 20-25. |
| [609] |
Warden III, USAF. Col. John. (1994, Dec.). Non Lethal
Concepts of Operation. Presented at Sixth Annual SO/LIC-CD Symposium and Exhibition,
Washington, District of Columbia. Draft. |
| [610] |
Wargovich et al. (1975, Sep.). Evaluation of the
Physiological Effects of a Rubber Bullet, a Baseball, and a Flying Baton. Technical
Memorandum 24-75. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: U.S. Army Human Engineering
Laboratory. |
| [611] |
Washington Post. (1994, 23 Mar.). Pentagon, Justice Dept.
Set Plans for Sharing of Nonlethal Technology, A3. |
| [612] |
Weapons Systems Concept Office, Development and
Engineering Directorate. (1975, Oct.). Soft/Sting Ring Airfoil Grenade Civil Disturbance
Control System; Concise Summary Description. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland. |
| [613] |
Weapons Systems Concept Office, Development and
Engineering Directorate. (1975, Apr.). Development Plan for Soft Ring Airfoil Munitions
System--Revision C. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland. |
| [614] |
Weigand, D.A. (1969). Cutaneous reaction to the riot
control agent CS. Military Medicine, 134. |
| [615] |
Weiner, J.T. et al. (1960). A study of the acute and
subacute toxicity of aerosols of CS in small laboratory animals. Edgewood Arsenal, MD:
Edgewood Arsenal Chemical Warfare Laboratory. 2360. |
| [616] |
Weiner, Malcolm H. and Boyd, David. (1996, Sum.). Forum:
Nonlethal Weapons. Issues in Science and Technology, 12, (4) 12-13. |
| [617] |
Weiner, Malcolm H., chairman. (1995). Nonlethal
Technologies: Military Options and Implications. Report of an Independent Task Force. New
York, New York: Council on Foreign Relations. |
| [618] |
Weinschenk, A. (1993, 24 Nov.). Non-lethal weapons group
set to form in March. Defense Weekly, 14, (46) 1. |
| [619] |
Weinschenk, A. (1993, 16 Feb.). Boosters again are pushing
for "Office of Non-Lethality." Defense Weekly, 2. |
| [620] |
Weiss, D.R., Brandt, D.J. & Tweet, K.D. (n.d.). Smart
Gun Technology Requirements Preliminary Report. Contract IAA-94-IJ-R-021. Albuquerque, New
Mexico: Sandia National Laboratories. |
| [621] |
Westbrook, E.E. & Williams, L.W. (1971, 30 Apr.). A
Brief Survey of Nonlethal Weapons. Report No. RACIC-TR-66, sponsored by ARPA Order No.
1509. Columbus, Ohio: RACIC Battelle Memorial Institute. |
| [622] |
Westing, Arthur W. (1990, Feb.). Use of Chemical Weapons
Illegal? Letter to the Editor. Military Review, 70, (2) 82-83. |
| [623] |
Williams, Robert H. (1993, Oct.). Non-Lethal Devices Slice
Across Science Spectrum. National Defense, 78, (491) 25. |
| [624] |
Wilsnack, Richard W. et al. (1971, Mar.) Comprehensive Law
and Order Assistance Research and Development (CLOARAD) Program, Technical Report No.
71-04. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: U.S. Army Land Warfare Laboratory. |
| [625] |
Witten, Benjamin. (1965). Non-Lethal Agents for Denial of
Terrain in Limited Warfare Situations. Edgewood Arsenal, Maryland: U.S. Army Edgewood
Arsenal, Chemical Research and Development Laboratories. |
| [626] |
Wolfowitz, Paul. (1991, 10 Mar.). Do We Need a Non Lethal
Defense Initiative? Memorandum to the Secretary of Defense. USD(P). |
| [627] |
Wright, Robin. (1995, 6 Sep.). Iraqis Admit to Broad,
Virulent Germ War Plan. Los Angeles Times, A1, A11. |
| [628] |
York, Ken C, Gourley, Scott, & Arsentein, Seth. (1993,
3 Feb.). Non-Lethal Weapons Offer New SO/LIC Capabilities. Tactical Technology, 1-5. |
| [629] |
Yost, James Michael. (1993). Non-Lethal Weapons: A Study
of Effectiveness in Reducing Injuries and Brutality Complaints. Thesis. Virginia
Commonwealth University. |
| [630] |
Zaloga, S. (1990, May.). Soviets close to deploying
battlefield beam weapons. Armed Forces Journal International. |
| [631] |
Zekri, A.M.B. et al. (1995, Dec.). Acute Mass Burns Caused
By O-Chlorobenzylidene Malononitrile (CS) Tear Gas. Burns, 21, (8) 586-589. |
IV. Addendum
| [632] |
Aviation Week & Space Technology. (1994,
24 Jan.). NATO's Peek: Nonlethal Weapons. 140, (4) 33. |
| [633] |
Bunker, Robert J. (1996, Spr.). Generations,
Waves and Epochs: Modes of Warfare and the RPMA. Airpower Journal, 10 23-25. |
| [634] |
Bunker, Robert J. (1996, Sum.). Ricochets and
Replies: RPMA Update. Airpower Journal, 10 3, 117. |
| [635] |
Bunker, Robert J. (1997). Grenades, launched,
Allied and DRV, Spencer C. Tucker, ed. The Vietnam War: An Encyclopedia. New York, New
York: Garland Publishing. |
| [636] |
Cooper, Pat. (1995, 20-26 Mar.). Naval
Research Lab Attempts to Meld Neurons and Chips: Studies May Produce Army of 'Zombies.'
Defense News, 10, 1, 50. |
| [637] |
Hay, Jr. John H. (1974). Tactical and
Materiel Innovations. Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Government Printing Office. |
| [638] |
Linder, US Army. Maj. James B. (1996,
Sept.-Oct.). A Case for Employing Nonlethal Weapons. Military Review, 76, (5) 25-29. |
| [639] |
Marine Corps Combat Development Command.
(1996, 20-21 Aug.). Proceedings of the Non-Lethal Modeling and Simulation Workshop. Hosted
by Non Lethal Weapons Program & Non Lethal Coordination Cell. Quantico, Virginia. |
| [640] |
Metz, Steven & Kievit, James. (1995, 27
Jun.). Strategy and the Revolution in Military Affairs. Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania:
U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute. |
| [641] |
Office of the Judge Advocate General. (1995,
6 Feb.). Legal Review of Barrier Foam. Alexandria, Virginia: Department of the Navy. |
| [642] |
Rauss, Patrick J. et al. (1996, 23-25 Jul.).
FERET (Face-Recognition Technology) Recognition Algorithms in Proceedings of the Fifth
Automatic Target Recognizer System and Technology Symposium. Sponsored by the Automatic
Target Recognizer Working Group. |
| [643] |
Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition
and Technology. (1996, 22 Mar.). Nonlethal Weapons (NLW) Program Implementation. Memo. |
| [644] |
U.S. Department of Justice. (1996, Oct.).
High-Speed Pursuit: New Technologies Around the Corner. National Law Enforcement and
Corrections Technology Center Bulletin, 1-6. |
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY
Lieutenant General Tad J. Oelstrom
Superintendent
Brigadier General Ruben A. Cubero
Dean of the Faculty
HEADQUARTERS, US AIR FORCE
DIRECTORATE OF NUCLEAR AND COUNTERPROLIFERATION
Major General Thomas H. Neary
Director
Colonel Thomas D. Miller
Chief, Policy Division
USAF INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Lieutenant Colonel Peter L. Hays
Director
Lieutenant Colonel Jeffrey A.
Larsen
Editor
Major Vincent J. Jodoin
Editor
Ms Marsha Taylor
Cover Design
INSS OCCASIONAL PAPERS
1. Explaining Weapons Proliferation: Going
Beyond the Security Dilemma. Gregory J. Rattray, July 1994
2. The Ukrainian Military: Instrument for
Defense or Domestic Challenge? Oleg Strekal, November 1994
3. North Korea's Nuclear Program: The
Clinton Administration's Response. William E. Berry, Jr., March 1995
4. Environmental Assistance as National
Security Policy: Helping the Former Soviet Union Find Solutions to its Environmental
Problems. Robert L. Dunaway, November 1995
5. Economic Power in the Sino-U.S.
Relationship. Kevin F. Donovan, December 1995
6. Nuclear Proliferation: Diminishing
Threat? William H. Kincade, December 1995
7. Nuclear Proliferation: The Diplomatic
Role of Non-Weaponized Programs. Rosalind R. Reynolds, January 1996
8. Five Minutes Past Midnight: The Clear and
Present Danger of Nuclear Weapons Grade Fissile Materials. Guy B. Roberts,
February 1996
9. The International Legal Implications
of Information Warfare. Richard W. Aldrich, April 1996
10. Weapons Proliferation and Organized
Crime: The Russian Military and Security Force Dimension. Graham H.
Turbiville, Jr., June 1996
11. Melancholy Reunion: A Report from the
Future on the Collapse of Civil-Military Relations in the United States. Charles
J. Dunlap, Jr., October 1996
12. Russia's Crumbling Tactical Nuclear
Weapons Complex: An Opportunity for Arms Control. Stephen P. Lambert and David
A. Miller, April 1997
13. Political-Military Affairs Officers and
the Air Force: Continued Turbulence in a Vital Career Specialty. James E.
Kinzer and Marybeth Peterson Ulrich, April 1997
14. Environmental Federalism and U.S. Military
Installations: A Framework for Compliance. James M. Smith, June 1997
|